This is a new thread inspired by a suggestion from Global Truth and a well-established thread from Calum on the jazz boards. Absolutely no rules. Nevertheless, it might help to have a "vision thing".
1. Choices should probably be based on relatively recent releases, even if they are compilations of material recorded in the 1930s.
2. Could we try here to define the genre slightly more narrowly? This need not be rigid or stick to the very obvious. However, I have in mind that it might be in scope a continuation of the terrific work undertaken by Charlie Gillett in the last decade of his life.
The latter is still available and it is regular reference material for me. Some of it is here:
Here's then to June 2011. Go on. You know you want to. Well, actually, if you don't, just let me know and we won't bother with it, but that would be a real pity.
1. Choices should probably be based on relatively recent releases, even if they are compilations of material recorded in the 1930s.
2. Could we try here to define the genre slightly more narrowly? This need not be rigid or stick to the very obvious. However, I have in mind that it might be in scope a continuation of the terrific work undertaken by Charlie Gillett in the last decade of his life.
The latter is still available and it is regular reference material for me. Some of it is here:
Here's then to June 2011. Go on. You know you want to. Well, actually, if you don't, just let me know and we won't bother with it, but that would be a real pity.
Comment