Originally posted by Lat-Literal
View Post
Such a thorny question, I convened an emergency sub-committee meeting of the WM Thread Namers.
The meeting lasted many hours and, despite best efforts, diverged widely. Hardly surprising given that the member included, but were not confined to Mr Justice Cocklecarrot, Mr Tinklebury Snapdriver, and the loquacious Mr Honeyweather Gooseboote.
At one point it was suggested by Dr Strabismus (whom God preserve) of Utrecht that threads should only be started if the person, genre or sub-genre referred to could be proven to have appropriate and current visa accreditation. This would not, of course, apply to the Filthistan Trio, from Thurralibad, whose time-honoured folk tradition of see-saw is de facto confined to London.
After a quick financial assessment of costs required to implement such a checking system (billions apparently) and an even quicker reference to the Use Your F***ing Common Sense committee (which is it seems permanently engaged fighting fires elsewhere) the idea was unanimously recognised as a poisson rouge, another of Dr Strabismus' extravagant ideas.
The saucy Mrs Flobster pointed out that there is a Thread Creation Ration number based on a complex algorithm derived from Years on Forum x Attendance on Forum / pertinence and popularity of threads created. Usually around 42.
This number is significantly under used on this particular forum.
The decision of the committee can be summarised thus:
just start another thread.
Under present rules it is also possible to have more than one topic associated with a particular day. Also a day may be divided into recognised sections, that is: morning, afternoon, evening.
Further subdivisions may also be made.
The decision of the committee may be final.
Comment