Originally posted by Lordgeous
View Post
Prom 39 (4.09.21) - John Wilson Conducts the Sinfonia of London
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostSome depressingly sexist and utterly unaware of discrimination responses on this thread - she compared it to the VPO’s old days . Some people seem to think it is OK to discriminate so long as the white men are good at what they do.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Prommer View PostI confess I had overlooked that you were pointing up, via the Times review, a sense that the Sinfonia has racial as well as gender issues. Blimey. What, in your view, is the correct number? Will you not listen again unless it is corrected? How will your ears' experience change as the numbers change, and why/how?
I would also guess that it’s not too dissimilar to the numbers in several permanent orchestras in the UK and in Europe. For example, the Berlin Phil website lists 20 women members in the orchestra in total, so if the BPO had played a similar programme, it would have probably included fewer women than John Wilson’s hand-picked orchestra.
That’s not to say that there aren’t gender and racial diversity issues in British orchestras, but as far as I could see, the insinuation in the Times review that the Sinfonia of London is an outlier and a dreadful throwback to non-diverse orchestras of the past was simply not justified."I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square."
Lady Bracknell The importance of Being Earnest
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LHC View PostHaving watched the concert on BBC Four the other night, I’m not sure that there was much basis for the Times’ critic’s complaint. As far as I could see there were around 20 women playing in the orchestra. That’s much more than the VPO manage even now, and is in no way comparable to the VPO’s old days when the most you would see was one or two women. With the exception of the brass, all other sections of the orchestra included at least one woman, and most had several.
I would also guess that it’s not too dissimilar to the numbers in several permanent orchestras in the UK and in Europe. For example, the Berlin Phil website lists 20 women members in the orchestra in total, so if the BPO had played a similar programme, it would have probably included fewer women than John Wilson’s hand-picked orchestra.
That’s not to say that there aren’t gender and racial diversity issues in British orchestras, but as far as I could see, the insinuation in the Times review that the Sinfonia of London is an outlier and a dreadful throwback to non-diverse orchestras of the past was simply not justified.Don’t cry for me
I go where music was born
J S Bach 1685-1750
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BBMmk2 View PostWas The Times watching the same programme?"I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square."
Lady Bracknell The importance of Being Earnest
Comment
-
-
And then we see the logic corollary of The Times's apparent concerns about the Sinfonia of London...https://slippedisc.com/2021/09/engli...-more-diverse/
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LHC View PostWell the comment about the Orchestra consisting overwhelmingly of white men came from the Times review of the same concert.
Its sad that The Times is the newspaper with the best journalism (with the proviso of filtering out the adulatory Johnson (& Cabal) material - easy enough to spot). And that its behind a paywall. Sad, in the sense that the Telegraph is a shadow of its former self and the Guardian, good as it is, doesn't have the breadth and depth of The Times. (The FT, with its reputation for impartial reporting, is unfortunately priced for financial market customers and beyond the value I would get from it). I avoided Murdoch's paper(s) for many a year but had to recognise its a source of hard information and (often times) quality journalism. With the added opportunity (when the fancy takes) of winding up the UKIP/ xx.....xx Reearch group Bots in the online article comments.
Also, of course, a shame its behind a hard paywall.....
Comment
-
Comment