I find Fry both funny, well-read, and of considerable intellect. However, that does not make him the right person for the role he carried out last night. He's mad about Wagner but otherwise not noted for his musical acumen. As to his health. He is famously bipolar and also had his prostate and several lymph modes removed a couple of years ago, due to aggresive cancer.
Prom 53 (28.08.20) Live performance; Eroica Symphony
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI was delighted to hear a live concert . I did not warm to Whitacre’s bland piece . The commission was OK and Quiet City was effective .
I enjoyed the Eroica but good points are made above re the balance - my ideal Eroica is probably Erich Kleiber with the VPO and the first part of the first movement lacked grip and fire for me but things improved from them on .
PS How anyone can describe Stephen Fry as a celeb smartass beggars belief . A really offensive and inaccurate statement.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Alison View PostSF’s involvement in virtual Choral Evensong
I couldn’t take any of the chat in the Prom TV broadcast...
... nor did I appear to be in the right mood for the concert (or perhaps it wasn’t all my fault, judging by some posts above)."...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
He read from the Bible in such a manner that it was a performance ! https://youtu.be/3X8FYAb3JK0
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostSorry, but that's EXACTLY what he is, or at least how he comes across to me.
A smug, self-styled, self-promoting pundit who actually doesn't know his stuff and someone to whom the BBC gave too much airtime.
Actually, I thought that we'd got rid of him and that he was now living in California, surrounded by luvvies, so was quite surprised to see him in the RAH.
Was there REALLY no-one else available?
Comment
-
-
Whether Stephen Fry was the right person for Friday’s broadcast is a matter of opinion . The ad hominem attacks on him are more about the prejudices of those attacking him. He is a polymath who does not profess to know everything hence his admission that he did not know Quiet City. Yes he was probably brought in as a high profile music lover not as a music expert but we had the other contributor too. They both gave rather similar responses.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostWhether Stephen Fry was the right person for Friday’s broadcast is a matter of opinion . The ad hominem attacks on him are more about the prejudices of those attacking him. He is a polymath who does not profess to know everything hence his admission that he did not know Quiet City. Yes he was probably brought in as a high profile music lover not as a music expert but we had the other contributor too. They both gave rather similar responses.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostIt was Jonathan Scott who played last night.
Sadly, John Scott (certainly a natural, and a much missed choir director to boot) is no longer with us.
Give some organists a Big Beast and they go wild. I felt that during Jonathan's encore - Nimrod. The quiet beauty of the whole was spoiled by the over loud climax in the middle.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostSorry, but that's EXACTLY what he is, or at least how he comes across to me.
A smug, self-styled, self-promoting pundit who actually doesn't know his stuff and someone to whom the BBC gave too much airtime.
Actually, I thought that we'd got rid of him and that he was now living in California, surrounded by luvvies, so was quite surprised to see him in the RAH.
Was there REALLY no-one else available?
There are already more than enough 'experts' on the radio and TV, some of them regrettably nowhere near as articulate as Stephen Fry.Last edited by LMcD; 30-08-20, 11:53.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostWhether Stephen Fry was the right person for Friday’s broadcast is a matter of opinion . The ad hominem attacks on him are more about the prejudices of those attacking him. He is a polymath who does not profess to know everything hence his admission that he did not know Quiet City. Yes he was probably brought in as a high profile music lover not as a music expert but we had the other contributor too. They both gave rather similar responses.
“Prejudice” is generally appiled to something less acceptable.Last edited by teamsaint; 30-08-20, 12:33.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostDavid Icke? Nigel Farage? Sandi Toksvig? Arthur Scargill? Tom Service? Miss Alker? Miss Klein?
There are already more than enough 'experts' on the radio and TV, some of them regrettably nowhere near as articulate as Stephen Fry.
Comment
-
Comment