Prom 57: John Wilson conducts Bernstein's On the Town – 25.08.18

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BBMmk2
    Late Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 20908

    #16
    Lovely evening, apart from KD and that guest of hers, who could hardly string a sentence together.
    Don’t cry for me
    I go where music was born

    J S Bach 1685-1750

    Comment

    • Paulie55
      Full Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 87

      #17
      Overdone and Overcooked

      I'm sorry to say I disagree with all the posts praising this production but I acknowledge this is a personal view. "Stagey" is the word I would use, literally, appalling accents and shouted-out dialogue, pointless narration, embarrassing stage movements........I could go on. The orchestra played very well but the whole thing just does not work semi-staged. Even though the movie leaves out many of the songs and changes the action somewhat, give me that every time. Sorry but it was a travesty. Time to give semi-staged musicals the boot, especially for the Proms. [Now I await the backlash from people telling me I don't know what i'm talking about!]


      Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
      19:30
      ON TV
      Royal Albert Hall

      Leonard Bernstein: On the Town

      Nathaniel Hackmann Gabey
      Louise Dearman Hildy
      London Symphony Orchestra orchestra
      John Wilson conductor
      Martin Duncan Stage Director


      Launching a Bernstein bank-holiday weekend on what would have been the composer’s 100th birthday, John Wilson conducts Bernstein’s hit Broadway musical On The Town, which follows the adventures of three sailors on shore leave in 1944.

      Comment

      • Ein Heldenleben
        Full Member
        • Apr 2014
        • 7054

        #18
        I wouldn't disagree - though I though the singers last night had a better grasp of the Broadway idiom than in the recent West Side Story ( Maria and Tony excepted ). Thing is both OTT and WSS have such a crucial dance element to leave it out is a nonsense . You can get away with it in some Rodgers and Hammerstein ( though last year's Oklahoma had some magnificent dancing in it ) but not in these works. On a positive note the lack of dance does throw the spotlight on Bernstein's wonderful dance music - he must be amongst the very greatest dance composers of the 20th century . As for the great , innovative mega-talent that was Jerome Robbins - he must be pirouetting in his grave ...

        Comment

        • Nevilevelis

          #19
          Originally posted by Paulie55 View Post
          I'm sorry to say I disagree with all the posts praising this production but I acknowledge this is a personal view. "Stagey" is the word I would use, literally, appalling accents and shouted-out dialogue, pointless narration, embarrassing stage movements........I could go on. The orchestra played very well but the whole thing just does not work semi-staged. Even though the movie leaves out many of the songs and changes the action somewhat, give me that every time. Sorry but it was a travesty. Time to give semi-staged musicals the boot, especially for the Proms. [Now I await the backlash from people telling me I don't know what i'm talking about!]
          I have no idea whether or not you know what you're talking about (the joy of this forum!), but if you're expressing an opinion... that's allowed, isn't it? Yes.

          FWIW (most here couldn't care less what I think), I diasagree and I think you're overtsating it a little. Feedback from officionados in the hall last night was that it was generally a success and came accross well. À chacun son son goût!

          According to the programme notes, only four nos. (do they mean songs?) made into the film. Time for a new film? Perhaps you could direct it?!

          Cheers!

          NVV

          Comment

          • Ein Heldenleben
            Full Member
            • Apr 2014
            • 7054

            #20
            The film would have been even better if they'd let the hugely talented cast sing numbers like Lonely Town, Some Other Time , and Lucky To Be Me. Instead they substituted run of the mill Tin Pan Alley stuff like You're Awful. No wonder Bernstein would have nothing to do with it. Who would you remake it with ? Does anyone fancy stepping into Gene Kelly's shoes ?

            Comment

            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
              Gone fishin'
              • Sep 2011
              • 30163

              #21
              Originally posted by Nevilevelis View Post
              According to the programme notes, only four nos. (do they mean songs?) made into the film. Time for a new film? Perhaps you could direct it?!
              Not necessarily - a "number" in a Broadway Musical can be a (solo) song, or an ensemble or chorus, or a Dance number, or an instrumental movement. WIKI gives a good account of which Numbers featured on Broadway, and which in the film.



              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

              Comment

              • jonfan
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 1457

                #22
                Originally posted by edashtav View Post
                I thought the LSO had a ball and its work brought the Show alive; such a contrast to the stiff-jointed ensemble recruited for West Side Story earlier in the Season
                A fantastic evening in the hall with everyone on top form. A pity Bernstein didn't concentrate more on composing rather than spending his time conducting. There were some rather unsavoury moments in his dealings with people in the documentary that followed on BBC Four.

                Comment

                • BBMmk2
                  Late Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 20908

                  #23
                  The LSO certainly was having a ball! They really looked liked they were having fun! Great to see!
                  Don’t cry for me
                  I go where music was born

                  J S Bach 1685-1750

                  Comment

                  • gurnemanz
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 7430

                    #24
                    Having tuned in to the TV broadcast and not necessarily expecting to stick with it, I found myself hooked by infectiously enthusiastic, well-prepared and committed performances.

                    Comment

                    • bluestateprommer
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 3024

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Heldenleben View Post
                      The film would have been even better if they'd let the hugely talented cast sing numbers like Lonely Town, Some Other Time , and Lucky To Be Me. Instead they substituted run of the mill Tin Pan Alley stuff like You're Awful. No wonder Bernstein would have nothing to do with it. Who would you remake it with ? Does anyone fancy stepping into Gene Kelly's shoes ?
                      Based on his hoofing in Hail, Caesar!, I can imagine Channing Tatum stepping into GK's shoes, if a film or TV remake were ever to occur. But I'm not holding my breath on that one. Plus, Bernstein got $5K for permission by MGM to tweak the musical selections, and remember that this was $5K in 1949.

                      As this is another of the upcoming holiday selection of Proms repeats, hence the thread bump. It is unfortunate to give 2 slots to John Wilson merely because of popularity / perceived popularity, essentially shutting out other and arguably more worthy choices. Of the two LB/JW Proms, I would have chosen On the Town easily over WSS, as the former was by the superior of the two. Plus, for Christmas night, R3 missed a clever trick because they had the BBC SO Prom with Act I of The Nutcracker on call .

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X