Georg Freidrich Haas, a has been, methinks.
Prom 21: An Alpine Symphony – 30.07.18
Collapse
X
-
On a first hearing the Haas Concerto Grosso No.1 sounded to these ears as a slow-moving, spectralist(**) meditation on sonority, which became climactically more active and dynamic around 2/3 the way through, finally fragmenting into a sort-of coda which stopped abruptly....
I didn't think of mountains much, perhaps not surprising as Haas says (according to the presenter) that he doesn't love them, as "they steal the light, are dangerous and cold......"
Familiarity, contempt etc.
(**)
(reminded me of Dusapin and Murail..)
***
Orchestral delicacy the obvious stylistic feature of the Mozart k.286, very much the Stereo-Echo-Serenade at home, rather than the spatial spectacle it was exploited for in-hall.
For radio it was perhaps a bit visual, as DJs used to say.
Musically a charming diversion, but I couldn't help thinking about the Schumann 4-Horn Konzertstück as an obvious and better opener...Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 30-07-18, 20:57.
Comment
-
-
The BBC SSO (including the multiple extra brass players; Kate Molleson mentioned 2x that there were 21 horn players in all for the Strauss) just played Eine Alpensinfonie very well. Yet something about Ilan Volkov's interpretation struck me as a bit "gilb" for much of it, if that makes sense. Not that one has to contemplate every phrase for depth in this work; maybe Volkov wanted to remove any sense of over-heaviness about the work, to make it a young person's trek up the mountain, or something like that.
The GFH did have a more contemplative, perhaps ritualistic quality about it, to add to JLW's "spectral" characterization. Granted with the types of instruments involved, one perhaps shouldn't expect Mozart horn concerto-like fast writing. Cute encore from one of the Alphorn Quartet musicians, Lioba by Balthasar Streiff (duly archived in the Forum Calendar). The binaural experience certainly made itself felt with the Mozart.
Comment
-
-
Haas and Harry’s Hedgehogs
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostOn a first hearing the Haas Concerto Grosso No.1 sounded to these ears as a slow-moving, spectralist(**) meditation on sonority, which became climactically more active and dynamic around 2/3 the way through, finally fragmenting into a sort-of coda which stopped abruptly....
I didn't think of mountains much, perhaps not surprising as Haas says (according to the presenter) that he doesn't love them, as "they steal the light, are dangerous and cold......"
Familiarity, contempt etc.
(**)
(reminded me of Dusapin and Murail..)
RnSpectral comparisons: Dusapin and Murail are far ahead of Haas in terms of invention and structure.
Yes, Herr Haas, alphorns are not the most nimble of instruments but that doesn’t mean that your piece must progress at the pace of Bruckner overdosing on Mogadon. I had plenty of time to think, and conjured an image of Harry Birtwistle writing a piece for four rutting hedgehogs and orchestra. He’d have accepted that hedgehogs mate at their own lento rate, but he’d have accompanied them and, possibly, egged th3m one with rutting and other material in different forms and at different tempi across the sections of the orchestra. Minimalism doesn’t imply mimimal invention spread over maximal time.
Haas’s concerto was a snore-fest.
Now: there’s a thought... Harry would have included snoring hedgehogs, sleeping after lengthycoitus non interruptus. I can tell you from personal experience ... it’s one heck of a hullabaloo of grunts, sliding tones and cross rhythms.
However, I loved the Mozart but turned off the R.Strauss which haas its moments but... is not for snowflakes.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bluestateprommer View PostThe BBC SSO (including the multiple extra brass players; Kate Molleson mentioned 2x that there were 21 horn players in all for the Strauss) just played Eine Alpensinfonie very well. Yet something about Ilan Volkov's interpretation struck me as a bit "gilb" for much of it, if that makes sense. Not that one has to contemplate every phrase for depth in this work; maybe Volkov wanted to remove any sense of over-heaviness about the work, to make it a young person's trek up the mountain, or something like that.
A fine interpretation, but there was some imprecision, possible due to some tempi being too brisk for the RAH.
Comment
-
-
The problem I found with the Haas work seemed to stem from the composer's somewhat half-hearted exploration of the microtonal overtones; the composer repeatedly having to (or choosing to) build up to these notes from lower, more "conventional" pitches, and (because of the size of the instruments) having to take some time to reach the overtones to get them to "speak". So after ten minutes, what the piece "did" was already over - but you can't gather four of these instruments and put them with a symphony orchestra only to write a ten-minute piece, so the remaining twenty minutes was just more of the same.
As MrGG has shown with his link to the Arkady Shilkloper video in #9, there are far more imaginative and versatile things a Musician can do with these instruments.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by edashtav View PostI’m mainly in agreement, Jayne but question you
RnSpectral comparisons: Dusapin and Murail are far ahead of Haas in terms of invention and structure.
Yes, Herr Haas, alphorns are not the most nimble of instruments but that doesn’t mean that your piece must progress at the pace of Bruckner overdosing on Mogadon. I had plenty of time to think, and conjured an image of Harry Birtwistle writing a piece for four rutting hedgehogs and orchestra. He’d have accepted that hedgehogs mate at their own lento rate, but he’d have accompanied them and, possibly, egged th3m one with rutting and other material in different forms and at...
Now: there’s a thought... Harry would have included snoring hedgehogs, sleeping after lengthycoitus non interruptus. I can tell you from personal experience ... it’s one heck of a hullabaloo of grunts, sliding tones and cross rhythms.
However, I loved the Mozart but turned off the R.Strauss which haas its moments but... is not for snowflakes.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kernelbogey View PostJust curious if you were in the hall; and, indeed, how far you will travel to hear it live.
But no, I wasn't there last night.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI've heard it live several times at the Proms, the most recent being VPO/Haitink. But the one that eclipses them all was the Halle/BBC Phil joint performance in the Bridgewater Hall. A monumental performance.
But no, I wasn't there last night.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostA fine interpretation, but there was some imprecision, possible due to some tempi being too brisk for the RAH.
It was all a bit episodic. Of course, the piece is episodic but so much more can be made of the structure to make it an organic whole. Just listen to Vladimir Jurowski's new recording on the LPO label to hear, among other fine things, wonderfully balanced strings (he used 72 - an extra cello and an extra double bass - 11 of them!). I do agree, however, that the combined Halle and BBCPO performance from Manchester was a knock-out; I was there.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LaurieWatt View PostHardly for me to disagree with one I regard as the ultimate authority on this piece, but I was there...
Comment
-
Comment