I'm pleased to have seen the enthusiasm for Canellakis's conducting on this site, contrasting as it does with a typical 'cleverer-than-thou' review by Richard Morrison in The Times, featuring this extraordinary piece of nonsense:
"I wasn’t quite so dazzled by the American on the podium. It’s easy to see why Karina Canellakis has risen fast. She keeps the music neat, makes lovely choreography with her arms and does nothing stupid with tempo. Where’s the temperament, though? Rachmaninov’s Symphonic Dances, the last orchestral testament of a depressive genius, has an undertone of black irony entirely missing in this sweetly untroubled reading."
I wonder if RM would ever write, about a male conductor, 'he keeps the music neat, makes lovely choreography with his arms....'. I somehow doubt it.
"I wasn’t quite so dazzled by the American on the podium. It’s easy to see why Karina Canellakis has risen fast. She keeps the music neat, makes lovely choreography with her arms and does nothing stupid with tempo. Where’s the temperament, though? Rachmaninov’s Symphonic Dances, the last orchestral testament of a depressive genius, has an undertone of black irony entirely missing in this sweetly untroubled reading."
I wonder if RM would ever write, about a male conductor, 'he keeps the music neat, makes lovely choreography with his arms....'. I somehow doubt it.
Comment