Originally posted by gradus
View Post
Prom 11: Mahler Symphony of a Thousand - 22.07.18
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostIf Carlsberg did trypos......
I think we can safely say that is a great addition to the language......
I too like "pricnipal" - it sounds like a fine addition to the insult lexicon, but perhaps that's just my rather warped view.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostI too like "pricnipal" - it sounds like a fine addition to the insult lexicon, but perhaps that's just my rather warped view.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostSounds like something from a Shakespeare Comedy - Zounds! Thou scurvy knave! Thou pimple! Thou pricnipal!I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostI think this performance isn't using the full 1,000 participants. That might explain the difference.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostWhat "full 1,000 participants"? The soubriquet is not Mahler's. Indeed, he was opposed to it. There may have been the very occasional performance inflated to such proportions, but not with the composer's sanction.
Btw, I don't like the subtitle and I'm surprised it actually gets used (by people who should know better)
Ditto the 'Titan' subtitle for #1
Comment
-
-
My first live encounter with the 8th was the Boulez performance at the First Night of the Proms 1975. Alberto Remedios had a nasty cold, which he fought through. Sadly, it does not seem to have been uploaded to YouTube, though it was available on dodgy Italian CDs for a while, IIRC. Boulez made the odd 'improvement', such as having the cymbal thumb-rubbed into vibration, rather than struck, at the opening of Part 2. It worked superbly.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostMy first live encounter with the 8th was the Boulez performance at the First Night of the Proms 1975. ... it was available on dodgy Italian CDs for a while, IIRC.
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
Hmm. I have found it on another pair of CDs, along with Berlioz: Nuits d'été. Still over £20 including p&p, but . . .
Comment
-
-
Much to be thankful for, live, in the hall. The soloists were all up to the part, and could be heard in the hall - so BBC microphones re-balancing and misrepresenting as against the experience in the hall is not a factor here. In fact the men were all rather good, and the ladies too. Not often the whole team of eight have no major weak link. Maybe a few question marks on ensemble in part one but the Orchestra and choruses were really very good (but I wouldn't say it outshone the last, BBC SO performance) . Importantly, Sondergard directed so the piece unfolded in a natural and impressive manner and didn't pull it about (I shudder as I think of Maazel). Reminiscent of Colin Davis who I think really had the measure of the piece.
Minor niggles - offstage brass in a box and not enough of them (Boulez and C Davis had, I'm sure, a markedlynbigger band (whatever the score says) and up in the gallery). Mater Gloriosa - per the programme text "floats into view" - but sounded like she was coming from the corridor and we heard none of the delicious edge/resonance I heard from her on Friday as Cleopatra at Glyndebourne (a great performance from her and all round, there). Major niggle was the balance with the organ - I now know for sure it can dominate a very large orchestra and choirs and wonder why on earth it wasn't checked and amended. At the end of part two, in the magical chorus mysticus, I thought discretion had prevailed as it was more restrained, but that didn't last and it took off as a solo instrument again, albeit not as unbridled nor for as long. Thankfully it didn't ruin the final moments.
But all in all, worth the cost (I picked up ticket in the grand tier a few weeks ago) and certainly worth turning out for.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Cockney Sparrow View PostMuch to be thankful for, live, in the hall. The soloists were all up to the part, and could be heard in the hall - so BBC microphones re-balancing and misrepresenting as against the experience in the hall is not a factor here. In fact the men were all rather good, and the ladies too. Not often the whole team of eight have no major weak link. Maybe a few question marks on ensemble in part one but the Orchestra and choruses were really very good (but I wouldn't say it outshone the last, BBC SO performance) . Importantly, Sondergard directed so the piece unfolded in a natural and impressive manner and didn't pull it about (I shudder as I think of Maazel). Reminiscent of Colin Davis who I think really had the measure of the piece.
Minor niggles - offstage brass in a box and not enough of them (Boulez and C Davis had, I'm sure, a markedlynbigger band (whatever the score says) and up in the gallery). Mater Gloriosa - per the programme text "floats into view" - but sounded like she was coming from the corridor and we heard none of the delicious edge/resonance I heard from her on Friday as Cleopatra at Glyndebourne (a great performance from her and all round, there). Major niggle was the balance with the organ - I now know for sure it can dominate a very large orchestra and choirs and wonder why on earth it wasn't checked and amended. At the end of part two, in the magical chorus mysticus, I thought discretion had prevailed as it was more restrained, but that didn't last and it took off as a solo instrument again, albeit not as unbridled nor for as long. Thankfully it didn't ruin the final moments.
But all in all, worth the cost (I picked up ticket in the grand tier a few weeks ago) and certainly worth turning out for.Fewer Smart things. More smart people.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Anastasius View PostListening at this end of the airwaves I think we must have been listening to two different concerts. I found the tempo all over the place, at times almost as if he was a desperate hurry getting to the pub. The soloists I thought were dire and it's one of those concerts that I'm glad I wasn't at !
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostOf course, having made my decision, I shall be kicking myself for the rest of my earthlies if the performance tonight turns out to be the best I've heard of the work!
Then again... with this piece, one's so much a hostage to the singers and I feel increasingly less like taking the risk these days. Cockney Sparrow seems to suggest the gamble would have paid off in this instance... Anastasius less so (but we know singers can sound fine in the hall but rank at the other end of the microphone/broadcast process).
On balance I'm kicking myself again. Whether I'll do so after 'catching up' on iPlayer, time will tell"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
Comment