Proms 2018

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • underthecountertenor
    Full Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 1584

    #61
    Originally posted by Anastasius View Post
    And I see it is the same user-unfriendly load of rubbish that it was last year (and the year before that).

    Dear BBC

    When you write

    Ravel’s sensuous mythological ballet Daphnis and Chloe meets the courtly beauty of Fauré’s Pavane in this concert by the BBC Symphony Orchestra. Rising Swiss pianist Francesco Piemontesi is the soloist in Mozart’s lyrical Piano Concerto No. 27.

    wastes everyones time wading through your unnecessary flowery prose.

    Ravel Daphnis and Chloe
    Faure Pavane
    Mozart Piano Concerto No 27

    is all that we need, thank you very much.

    I simply do not have the time or inclination to read page after page of waffle.
    I'm not sure I see what the great problem is. It's pretty easy to speed read the 'flowery prose' to decide whether the concert is of interest. For example, in the above, I can see at a glance that we've got Daphnis and Chloe, Faure's Pavane and Mozart PC 27, and that Piemontesi is the soloist with the BBC SO. And I am by inclination a 'read every word' kinda guy, so if I can do it, I'm sure you can.

    Also there is always (as there was before 'website' and 'subsite' were words) the physical book (prospectus, guide, call it what you will). You pays your money....

    Comment

    • Beef Oven!
      Ex-member
      • Sep 2013
      • 18147

      #62
      Originally posted by mrbouffant View Post
      As usual, I looked through the list and felt there was little for me. However, after a second pass I see I have noted 12 concerts which are of interest!/QUOTE]


      I had another look and discovered about 10 concerts I'm interested in!!!

      Comment

      • MrGongGong
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 18357

        #63
        "The Scratch Orchestra"
        turns out to be this



        So not really THE scratch orchestra at all
        but i'm sure it will be fun

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30329

          #64
          Who knows? There may be a one-page concert listing, as in previous years; though the compiler can't be expected to produce it before the details are published.

          If you click on the concert titles instead of Show more information you just get the details - no 'waffle'. One click per concert doesn't seem a lot these days.
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • Cockney Sparrow
            Full Member
            • Jan 2014
            • 2287

            #65
            Originally posted by underthecountertenor View Post
            I'm not sure I see what the great problem is. It's pretty easy to speed read the 'flowery prose' to decide whether the concert is of interest. For example, in the above, I can see at a glance that we've got Daphnis and Chloe, Faure's Pavane and Mozart PC 27, and that Piemontesi is the soloist with the BBC SO. And I am by inclination a 'read every word' kinda guy, so if I can do it, I'm sure you can. .
            They need to market the Proms, so I suppose they have to have their way. Let look on the bright side - at least they haven't taken the purple prose as far as to include taste (culinary) and olfactory (perfume) allusions in the short descriptive paragraph.

            One plus point is that the more detailed info - all artists, timings etc, is in a drop down menu on the same page. So I was able to go on from page to page reasonably quickly. (I need to establish which 2 week period of August we are going to be away from London area, so I've been holding off arrangements until the Proms prospectus was available).

            Comment

            • Bryn
              Banned
              • Mar 2007
              • 24688

              #66
              Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
              "The Scratch Orchestra"
              turns out to be this



              So not really THE scratch orchestra at all
              but i'm sure it will be fun
              Though it was, and is, frequently referred to a "The Scratch Orchestra", Cardew's Draft Constitution was for "A Scratch Orchestra", "scratch orchestra" being a well-worn term long before the June 1969 edition of Musical Times. Come to that, Phil Dadson set up a Scratch Orchestra (based on Cardew's concept) in Aukland when he returned to New Zealand shortly after the publication the Draft Constitution. As far as I'm concerned, the 1984, 2000 and 2015 performances of all or parts of Cardew's The Great Learning were each performed by a Scratch Orchestra. It is a bit naughty of the Proms to call their scratch orchestra "The Scratch Orcheatra" though.

              Comment

              • Constantbee
                Full Member
                • Jul 2017
                • 504

                #67
                Originally posted by mrbouffant View Post
                Bit of an unbalanced First Night !
                A bit, yes. Sounds like the sort of back to front programming we saw in 2017. Presumably it's a showcase for the 2018 Proms commitment to 50:50 new women composers. Well, fine, but at 22 minutes it's a short second half and the Meredith piece(s?) will be very exposed on the First Night.
                And the tune ends too soon for us all

                Comment

                • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                  Gone fishin'
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 30163

                  #68
                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  If you click on the concert titles instead of Show more information you just get the details - no 'waffle'. One click per concert doesn't seem a lot these days.
                  But it's still 180 clicks! Why isn't the more important information given immediately, and the gushy waffle reached by clicking? (I mean - look at the info for Prom 3; we can see instantly that it's the "Young Musicians 40th Anniversary", and that this will be celbrated by some past YMotY winners. But what are the works featured? Click on "Show More Info", and you get a list of the works; but then you have to scroll down for over thirty lines to get to the "Less Information" link to take you back to the "What's On?" page. That's an extreme case (because of all the performers involved), but even on all the others, there is no "instant" way of seeing what's on the programme; you have to scroll to get to the "Less Information" arrow.

                  But the magnitude of this faff isn't really what I think some of us are complaining about: it's the sheer fact that there is a faff at all. For the purposes of finding out what's on when, a "Proms at a Glance" feature would be less annoying/disspiriting.
                  [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                  Comment

                  • teamsaint
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 25210

                    #69
                    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                    But it's still 180 clicks! Why isn't the more important information given immediately, and the gushy waffle reached by clicking? (I mean - look at the info for Prom 3; we can see instantly that it's the "Young Musicians 40th Anniversary", and that this will be celbrated by some past YMotY winners. But what are the works featured? Click on "Show More Info", and you get a list of the works; but then you have to scroll down for over thirty lines to get to the "Less Information" link to take you back to the "What's On?" page. That's an extreme case (because of all the performers involved), but even on all the others, there is no "instant" way of seeing what's on the programme; you have to scroll to get to the "Less Information" arrow.

                    But the magnitude of this faff isn't really what I think some of us are complaining about: it's the sheer fact that there is a faff at all. For the purposes of finding out what's on when, a "Proms at a Glance" feature would be less annoying/disspiriting.
                    The Barbican website is almost, as bad.

                    Its easy really.One page with Date. Works. Performers. Basic ticket info for each event.
                    Click through to marketing waffle, and then an easy click back to basic details, which is where the Barbican website falls down, taking you back to the month overview.
                    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                    I am not a number, I am a free man.

                    Comment

                    • Demetrius
                      Full Member
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 276

                      #70
                      hmmm. Someone seen Prom 53 anywhere? 52 is the Bergen Phil on Tuesday 21/8, 54 is the Budapest Festival Orchestra at Wednesday 22/8

                      Comment

                      • Demetrius
                        Full Member
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 276

                        #71
                        Originally posted by Thropplenoggin View Post
                        but Diana Damrau singing 13 minutes of Strauss seems rather short order!
                        The new 17 minute long commission is also sung by her.

                        Comment

                        • teamsaint
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 25210

                          #72
                          Incidentally, I have a useful little filter on my laptop, which screens out all proms featuring:

                          Haydn
                          Contemporary works that aren't Proms commissions or late night proms.
                          British C20 music other than RVW and Elgar
                          Many European Mid C20 works, ( Martinu, Honegger stuff like that)
                          Almost all Symphonies never previously heard at the Proms.
                          Roussel
                          Schnittke
                          Non Sibelius Scandinavians


                          It works a treat, very helpful in cutting down on the abundance of choice.

                          ( the odd thing slips through the filter....and o
                          I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                          I am not a number, I am a free man.

                          Comment

                          • MrGongGong
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 18357

                            #73
                            Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                            Though it was, and is, frequently referred to a "The Scratch Orchestra", Cardew's Draft Constitution was for "A Scratch Orchestra", "scratch orchestra" being a well-worn term long before the June 1969 edition of Musical Times. Come to that, Phil Dadson set up a Scratch Orchestra (based on Cardew's concept) in Aukland when he returned to New Zealand shortly after the publication the Draft Constitution. As far as I'm concerned, the 1984, 2000 and 2015 performances of all or parts of Cardew's The Great Learning were each performed by a Scratch Orchestra. It is a bit naughty of the Proms to call their scratch orchestra "The Scratch Orcheatra" though.
                            Thanks for this

                            It is interesting that "From Scratch" sound more like Echo City, Man Jumping or The Lost Jockey than anything by Cardew

                            Comment

                            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                              Gone fishin'
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 30163

                              #74
                              Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                              Incidentally, I have a useful little filter on my laptop, which screens out all proms featuring ...
                              When you say "screens out", do you mean "highlights", ts?!
                              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                              Comment

                              • LHC
                                Full Member
                                • Jan 2011
                                • 1559

                                #75
                                Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                                The Barbican website is almost, as bad.

                                Its easy really.One page with Date. Works. Performers. Basic ticket info for each event.
                                Click through to marketing waffle, and then an easy click back to basic details, which is where the Barbican website falls down, taking you back to the month overview.
                                Yes, but the Barbican also provide a downloadable PDF summary providing all the basic details:

                                "I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square."
                                Lady Bracknell The importance of Being Earnest

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X