Proms 2018

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard Tarleton

    My one experience of this recently, apart from Proms on the radio or TV, was at a BBC NOW concert of baroque music in Swansea's Brangwyn Hall (the concert that included the famous car-crash Brandenburg 2). The first item on the programme was a Handel Concerto grosso (Op 6 no 6), which only lasts for about 16 minutes in total. After the first movement, i.e. after a couple of minutes, there was a bit of applause from one part of the hall which Rachel Podger, from the leader's chair, silenced with a gesture - finger to lips (and a smile) as I recall.

    I think the people clapping fell into ff's first category - anyway, we had no further trouble in spite of there being 4 more multi-movement works. Anyway, Ms Podger clearly thought inter-movement applause in a Handel concerto grosso was inappropriate.

    Comment

    • Beef Oven!
      Ex-member
      • Sep 2013
      • 18147

      Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View Post
      My one experience of this recently, apart from Proms on the radio or TV, was at a BBC NOW concert of baroque music in Swansea's Brangwyn Hall (the concert that included the famous car-crash Brandenburg 2). The first item on the programme was a Handel Concerto grosso (Op 6 no 6), which only lasts for about 16 minutes in total. After the first movement, i.e. after a couple of minutes, there was a bit of applause from one part of the hall which Rachel Podger, from the leader's chair, silenced with a gesture - finger to lips (and a smile) as I recall.

      I think the people clapping fell into ff's first category - anyway, we had no further trouble in spite of there being 4 more multi-movement works. Anyway, Ms Podger clearly thought inter-movement applause in a Handel concerto grosso was inappropriate.
      I guess she's entitled to her own opinion regarding the relationship between the performer and the audience. Happily, we also have such an entitlement.

      Comment

      • Bryn
        Banned
        • Mar 2007
        • 24688

        Originally posted by Beef Oven! View Post
        I guess she's entitled to her own opinion regarding the relationship between the performer and the audience. Happily, we also have such an entitlement.
        indeed, as did the composer, who would most likely have expected and appreciated it.

        Comment

        • ahinton
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 16123

          I think that it might at this point be worth noting the difference between those who seek to insist that there be no applause between movements and those who harbour no such desire but at the same time do not like it.

          In practical terms, a work like Turangalîla is something of a case in point, not only is there the factor that applause after all ten movements might considerably extend the overall duration as well as disturbing listeners' (and perhaps also players') concentration but also the conclusions (if any) that might be drawn from there being applause after only some of the movements.

          Comment

          • Bryn
            Banned
            • Mar 2007
            • 24688

            Hmm. Given that the composer specifically sanctioned the performance of various selections of movements from the work*, I really do not see any particular 'problem' relating to this symphony.

            * those specific movements being III, IV, V, in that order, or I, II, VI, IX, X, in that order.

            Comment

            • Richard Tarleton

              Originally posted by ahinton View Post
              ......
              In practical terms, a work like Turangalîla is something of a case in point, not only is there the factor that applause after all ten movements might considerably extend the overall duration as well as disturbing listeners' (and perhaps also players') concentration but also the conclusions (if any) that might be drawn from there being applause after only some of the movements.
              At the other end of the scale, the same might apply to a 16-minute suite with several very short movements (see above). Applause (from a small section of the audience) every two or three minutes is downright irritating, besides disturbing concentration and extending the work. A little silence for a bit of discreet re-tuning is also welcome, from the players' point of view. I haven't heard or read anything Rachel Podger may have said or written on the subject, so don't know her views in depth. But she and the majority in the hall were clearly on the same page. She is one of the leading baroque practitioners del mundo, so I'm inclined to give her views (if such they are) a little more weight.

              Comment

              • LMcD
                Full Member
                • Sep 2017
                • 8489

                'Das Wandern ist des Müllers Lust'
                Maybe half-a-dozen people applaud
                'Das Wandern'
                Maybe a dozen people applaud.

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 30329

                  Originally posted by Beef Oven! View Post
                  I guess she's entitled to her own opinion regarding the relationship between the performer and the audience. Happily, we also have such an entitlement.
                  I wonder what you would have done, had you been present on that occasion

                  Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                  indeed, as did the composer, who would most likely have expected and appreciated it.
                  I can't see that that is relevant, since the composer was one person who wasn't present. And even you modify your statement with 'most likely'.

                  It's a bit like the argument about whether Beethoven, say, would have appreciated a modern concert grand. He may well have done. Would he have welcomed the modern silence between movements? Oh, no, of course he wouldn't. Experiencing and thinking about what didn't exist in their day may well meet with a composer's approval, especially if they have a 'modernist' outlook
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • Eine Alpensinfonie
                    Host
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 20570

                    Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                    indeed, as did the composer, who would most likely have expected and appreciated it.
                    This is hardly relevant. The composer's dead. The adulation, that would mean so much to the creator, might be a factor at the premiere, but now it's just an intrusion by inconsiderate attention-seekers, or people who don't know when the music's finished, or those who lack self-discipline.

                    Comment

                    • Bryn
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 24688

                      Originally posted by french frank View Post
                      I wonder what you would have done, had you been present on that occasion



                      I can't see that that is relevant, since the composer was one person who wasn't present. And even you modify your statement with 'most likely'.

                      It's a bit like the argument about whether Beethoven, say, would have appreciated a modern concert grand. He may well have done. Would he have welcomed the modern silence between movements? Oh, no, of course he wouldn't. Experiencing and thinking about what didn't exist in their day may well meet with a composer's approval, especially if they have a 'modernist' outlook
                      You've got that spade out again, haven't you?

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30329

                        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                        an intrusion by inconsiderate attention-seekers, or people who don't know when the music's finished, or those who lack self-discipline.
                        Or those with a sense of 'entitlement'.
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • french frank
                          Administrator/Moderator
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 30329

                          Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                          You've got that spade out again, haven't you?
                          For a dimwit, could you explain what you mean rather than keep repeating it?
                          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                          Comment

                          • Bryn
                            Banned
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 24688

                            Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                            This is hardly relevant. The composer's dead. The adulation, that would mean so much to the creator, might be a factor at the premiere, but now it's just an intrusion by inconsiderate attention-seekers, or people who don't know when the music's finished, or those who lack self-discipline.
                            You are confounding your personal opinion with fact. I consider assertions of "attention-seeking" in this context as pure snobbery. That's is my opinion.

                            Comment

                            • Beef Oven!
                              Ex-member
                              • Sep 2013
                              • 18147

                              I went to the Comedy Store a few years ago and we were told not to laugh at the end of each joke, but to wait to the conclusion of the performance. Happily, we were all very social people with plenty of self control and no urge to seek attention, so it worked a treat.

                              Comment

                              • Bryn
                                Banned
                                • Mar 2007
                                • 24688

                                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                                For a dimwit, could you explain what you mean rather than keep repeating it?
                                No problem. The performance in question supposedly followed HIPP, i.e. Historically Informed Performance Practice. In such circumstances, audience responses in line with historical practice are to be expected. As you know, I also reckon, supposedly HIPP opera productions should pay due attention to custume and production values of the period of the work's compostion. At least, where opera is concerned, audience responses tend to equate more to historical tradition.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X