Originally posted by rauschwerk
View Post
Prom 30 - 7.08.17: Walton – Belshazzar’s Feast
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post...and yet has a "retransition" in the Recapitulation that does modulate?
Comment
-
-
I'm quite sure I didn't know all this about Beethoven 1 when I studied it (or rather the first two movements) as one of the set works for NUJMB O level back in 1966!
Whether this says more about me or my school music teacher I'm not sure, but I can remember not recognising the quote to identify on the paper (from the introduction) and I think I plumped for answering questions on the Holberg Suite and the Baal scene from Elijah instead.
I must look and see if Annie O Warburton did an analysis.
PS: Yes she did. Revolutionary tendencies mentioned.
With hindsight (trying to remember) I think we concentrated in class on the Grieg and the Mendelssohn.
I can't imagine being expected to study all three works/extracts in depth (even back then!).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostI'm quite sure I didn't know all this about Beethoven 1 when I studied it (or rather the first two movements) as one of the set works for NUJMB O level back in 1966!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by rauschwerk View PostI'm confused by this part of your question. I agree that earlier composers would have at this point generally continued immediately with the second group in the home key after the half close at the end of the transition, rather than writing a modulatory passage (though isn't that passage a 'secondary development' rather than a 'retransition'? Forgive my ignorance).
What Beethoven has done here is combined an older type of Transition (the "ending in the Tonic on an Imperfect Cadence, but then continuing in the Dominant region as if there's been a 'modulation'") in the Exposition, but then completely removed that material and replaced it with something different - bars 23 - 52 are never heard after the Exposition, completely new material replaces them in bars 188 - 205; the irony being that the chromatically slithering chords in the woodwinds would have been much better suited to a modulation away from the Tonic - the sort of material that a composer who was merely "learning the basics from his masters" would have used in the Expo, not here - and something more like the non-Modulating Transition material in the Exposition more "appropriate" here. (Something closer to Sammartini is presented in the Second Movement, where the First Group similarly ends with an interrupted cadence, from which the Second Group continues in the Dominant as if there had been a "modulation" - the Recap here doesn't involve the replacement of material, but the addition of the Counter-Subject to the return of the fugato theme creates its own deviations from expectations.)
And then there's the balancing out of the Introduction (in which the Tonic is marginalised - appearing only three times, and only once in root position) with the Movement's Coda (which consists of "22" bars of nothing but the Tonic triad) - and that reminds me; I do not know any "Sonata Form" First Group before this work in which the First Group itself is so eager to get away from the Tonic. Beethoven is in complete command of the new ways he wants to explore what a Symphony can do, right from the start. This is a fantastically original and imaginative masterpiece that is often undervalued because the composer went on to even greater things - that makes me mutter sulkily.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment