Prom 30 - 7.08.17: Walton – Belshazzar’s Feast

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BBMmk2
    Late Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 20908

    #16
    The tempi in all these works sounded rushed to me? In some ways spoilt the enjoyment.
    Don’t cry for me
    I go where music was born

    J S Bach 1685-1750

    Comment

    • edashtav
      Full Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 3668

      #17
      Part 2:

      What a fun and illumining interval discussion! There's nothing like an enthusiastic scholar, such as Irving Finkel. Seven, We Are Seven is Prokofiev at his most Expressionistic and the demands he makes on the "human" tenor are terrific and terrible. David Butt Philip made the wise decision to sing his line rather than yell it with maximum force. For once , the chorus sounded, occasionally , more stretched than the soloist. Up the Revolution! Yes, celebrate it whilst you can he composers and writers, for once the new power is installed, it will be more conservative than what but was replaced. Compare and contrast this ground-breaking piece with Prokofiev's later memorials to the Soviet Revolution. I'm unsure that it was fair to pair this cutting edge work with Willy Walton's essentially conservative, almost - Soviet Oratorio. However, the interpretation started well with great rhythmic energy and expression from the "men" of the the youthful choir. When the full choir entered, there were some moments of uncertain intonation. Nerves settled quickly, particularly after James Rutherford's bluff and confident first entry. However, I was left with the feeling that the Chorus was happier in rhythmic moments than in more reflective, legato passages. Rutherford's unaccompanied recitatives were colourful and robust. The choir's "Praise Ye" response was full-throated, light-footed and convincing. I must record that the National Youth Choir were not as stunning as its orchestral colleagues under Thomas Ades a few nights ago. However, I admired their diction. Did Babylon fall in fast order, or, maybe, disorder? The final Sing Aloud chorus had brio but lacked a sense of culmination. The orchestra peroration was distorted. For this listener, a performance that promised more than it delivered.

      ( Just to acknowkedge, ferney's robust, and well considered justification of the true originality of Beethoven's Symphony in C. It didn't suit my argument to mention those aspects but my ( ignorance?) is no justification!)

      Comment

      • EdgeleyRob
        Guest
        • Nov 2010
        • 12180

        #18
        Only heard BF,promised more than delivered sums it up for me too Ed.

        Comment

        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
          Gone fishin'
          • Sep 2011
          • 30163

          #19
          Originally posted by EdgeleyRob View Post
          Only heard BF
          Crumbs, Edgey! Careful with the initials there - for a moment I thought I'd missed something!
          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

          Comment

          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
            Gone fishin'
            • Sep 2011
            • 30163

            #20
            Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
            It sounded harsh, rushed and insincere to me.
            Oooh - nononononoNO!!! I'm not sure how a performance can "sound insincere", but the playful insolence, the wit, the cheerful energy of this performance was just right; the arrogant young composer, strutting into the Symphonic tradition - like Brando in The Wild One. Wonderful! Marvellous! Faithfully imaginative and downright jolly good.
            Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 07-08-17, 22:55.
            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

            Comment

            • Beef Oven!
              Ex-member
              • Sep 2013
              • 18147

              #21
              A great gig.

              Not up to to JA's N&SM last week, which is the benchmark for this year's Proms, IMHO.

              Comment

              • edashtav
                Full Member
                • Jul 2012
                • 3668

                #22
                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                Crumbs, Edgey! Careful with the initials there - for a moment I thought I'd missed something!

                Comment

                • edashtav
                  Full Member
                  • Jul 2012
                  • 3668

                  #23
                  Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                  Oooh - nononononoNO!!! I'm not sure how a performance can "sound insincere", but the playful insolence, the wit, the cheerful energy of this performance was just right; the arrogant young composer, strutting into the Symphonic tradition - like Brando in The Wild One. Wonderful! Marvellous! Faithfully imaginative and downright jolly good.
                  Spot on, fhg!

                  Comment

                  • Eine Alpensinfonie
                    Host
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 20570

                    #24
                    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                    Oooh - nononononoNO!!! I'm not sure how a performance can "sound insincere", but the playful insolence, the wit, the cheerful energy of this performance was just right; the arrogant young composer, strutting into the Symphonic tradition - like Brando in The Wild One. Wonderful! Marvellous! Faithfully imaginative and downright jolly good.
                    Naturally I'm please it was a success for many, and the audience seemed more than happy. I just felt that the energy was more technical than sincere, as though caffeine-induced. I sometimes feel the same about Gergiev's performances.

                    Comment

                    • Beef Oven!
                      Ex-member
                      • Sep 2013
                      • 18147

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                      Naturally I'm please it was a success for many, and the audience seemed more than happy. I just felt that the energy was more technical than sincere, as though caffeine-induced. I sometimes feel the same about Gergiev's performances.
                      Have you attended many of Gergiev's concerts?

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                        I sometimes feel the same about Gergiev's performances.
                        I've disliked a lot of Gergiev's performances (I think he relies on the fire of the moment, and often, for me, the sticks are dampened by careless, sloppily under-rehearsed playing) but I'd never describe them as "insincere" - I think he passionately believes that what he's doing is what's necessary for the Music to "live". (And when it does - wow!) I'd reserve "insincere" to describe performances which use the fame of a piece to mount a "spectacle" in which the Music is subservient to the "show". (I'd name names, but I think I'd rieu the day if I did.) I can't imagine that KK's performance last night could ever be described in those terms - but I don't think that that's what you meant by the word?
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • Beef Oven!
                          Ex-member
                          • Sep 2013
                          • 18147

                          #27
                          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                          I've disliked a lot of Gergiev's performances (I think he relies on the fire of the moment, and often, for me, the sticks are dampened by careless, sloppily under-rehearsed playing) but I'd never describe them as "insincere" - I think he passionately believes that what he's doing is what's necessary for the Music to "live". (And when it does - wow!) I'd reserve "insincere" to describe performances which use the fame of a piece to mount a "spectacle" in which the Music is subservient to the "show". (I'd name names, but I think I'd rieu the day if I did.) I can't imagine that KK's performance last night could ever be described in those terms - but I don't think that that's what you meant by the word?
                          Performances also exist in the moment. They are a snapshot in time. Gergiev is amazing. Go and see.

                          Comment

                          • BBMmk2
                            Late Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20908

                            #28
                            I didn't enjoy last night's prom very much. I felt that Kiril Karabit's tempi were too fast and perhaps rushed? The qualityof the playing was affected too. The NYCGB, just about managed alright, bless them.
                            Don’t cry for me
                            I go where music was born

                            J S Bach 1685-1750

                            Comment

                            • rauschwerk
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 1480

                              #29
                              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                              Well - which previous Symphony has a "Transition"/"Bridge" section in the Exposition that doesn't modulate to the Dominant (as "the basics" make it obvious it should)
                              Mozart's first, for a start, and probably other early Mozart symphonies too. It seems to have originated with G B Sammartini. Not revolutionary in 1800. then.

                              Comment

                              • Bryn
                                Banned
                                • Mar 2007
                                • 24688

                                #30
                                Originally posted by rauschwerk View Post
                                Mozart's first, for a start, and probably other early Mozart symphonies too. It seems to have originated with G B Sammartini. Not revolutionary in 1800. then.
                                Stirred, not shaken, I think.

                                Back in 1963, this was my introduction to Sammartini's Symphonies:


                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X