Sounds like I've missed something here, in the final movement?
Prom 14 - 25.07.17: Vaughan Williams & Holst
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostThe sound lacked some space and resonance around the orchestra, whilst being fairly full, in the string section and midrange generally. The opposite of dry is wet of course . In acoustic terms, a lot of reverberation or resonance (i.e low sound absorption). Think of some of those close-up Cleveland/Szell recordings, where dynamic range and hall echo is restricted, but the orchestral sound is attractively warm and vibrant.
Opposed to warm, a cold sound is one that lacks fullness and richness, and often one with excessive resonance too. (Some Melodiyas in the Moscow Radio Large Hall, Bruckner recordings in cathedrals...etc.)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ferretfancy View PostBlame it on the engineers Jayne, it certainly did not lack space and resonance in the hall. Both the RVW and the Holst have a huge dynamic range and the orchestra did them full justice, producing massive climaxes that engulfed the ear. It's really unfair of me to suggest blaming the engineers, since there isn't a system anywhere that can reproduce the sound of an orchestra in full tilt, however much we may wish for it. I would like to know how the quietest playing came across on air. I'm thinking of the delicate string playing in Venus, or the beautiful and lengthy fade out of the chorus in Neptune which kept us holding our breath for such a long time. Wonderful pedal notes from the organ shook the stomach.
(Even with the Vaughn Williams(**), it wasn't terrible - it was mainly a case, in the HCH, of pushing the volume a bit.... didn't stay on for the Holst).
(**) and something of a musical revelation for me, haven't stopped playing it since! - Boult (1959) and Rozhdestvensky).
Comment
-
Comment