Prom 50: 23.08.16 - Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninov and Prokofiev

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eine Alpensinfonie
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 20570

    Prom 50: 23.08.16 - Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninov and Prokofiev

    19:30 Tuesday 23 Aug 2016
    Royal Albert Hall

    Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky: Fantasy-Overture 'Hamlet'
    Sergei Rachmaninov: Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini
    Sergei Prokofiev: Symphony No 3 in C minor

    Stephen Hough piano
    BBC Symphony Orchestra
    Alexander Vedernikov conductor

    In 1919 Prokofiev started work on his opera The Fiery Angel, a touching love story set against the backdrop of demonic possession. He recast much of the opera's most impactful music into his Third Symphony. Alexander Vedernikov conducts it here after Stephen Hough plays Rachmaninov's devilish and ever-entertaining 'Paganini' Variations, and the final instalment of fellow-Russian Tchaikovsky's three Shakepeare overtures.

    Alexander Vedernikov conducts the BBC SO in Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninov and Prokofiev.
    Last edited by Eine Alpensinfonie; 23-08-16, 21:54.
  • Eine Alpensinfonie
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 20570

    #2
    "In 1919 Prokofiev started work on his opera The Fiery Angel, a touching love story set against the backdrop of demonic possession. He recast much of the opera's most impactful music into his Third Symphony." I never knew this.

    Russian music

    Comment

    • EdgeleyRob
      Guest
      • Nov 2010
      • 12180

      #3
      Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
      Russian music
      Yes indeed,but there is so much more Russian music other than that written by the usual suspects though theirs is.

      Comment

      • alywin
        Full Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 376

        #4
        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
        "In 1919 Prokofiev started work on his opera The Fiery Angel, a touching love story set against the backdrop of demonic possession. He recast much of the opera's most impactful music into his Third Symphony." I never knew this.
        Prokofiev was always fond of recycling his music: hence the Scythian Suite, played the other night, which was originally music for a ballet, Ala and Loly (I may not have spelled that correctly), which wasn't a success. (I think that's the right way round, rather than the suite preceding the ballet)

        Comment

        • mrbouffant
          Full Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 207

          #5
          Looking forward to this one tonight. Taking an old friend who has never been to a Prom or indeed the RAH. She is a sucker for the Rach so I am hoping she enjoys the front row choir seats on the pianist's side.

          Comment

          • BBMmk2
            Late Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 20908

            #6
            A great location, mrbouffant! I am sure she will!

            I can't wait for this. I am certainly very much in the mood for Russian music this year, maybe with the themed evening later, may prove me right!
            Don’t cry for me
            I go where music was born

            J S Bach 1685-1750

            Comment

            • bluestateprommer
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 3009

              #7
              Very fine start to this all-Russian Prom, with the BBC SO on cracking form with Vedernikov in the Tchaik. Hamlet. I didn't quite catch all of AV's pre-show comments with Martin Handley, so that'll have to be listened to later.)

              On the Rachmaninov, nice quip from Stephen Hough about Variation # 15 as the "Art Tatum" variation.

              Comment

              • edashtav
                Full Member
                • Jul 2012
                • 3670

                #8
                Originally posted by bluestateprommer View Post
                Very fine start to this all-Russian Prom, with the BBC SO on cracking form with Vedernikov in the Tchaik. Hamlet. I didn't quite catch all of AV's pre-show comments with Martin Handley, so that'll have to be listened to later.)

                On the Rachmaninov, nice quip from Stephen Hough about Variation # 15 as the "Art Tatum" variation.
                Full marks bsp for characterising tonight's Hamlet. T?he BBC SO have re-established their domination over the other BBC orchestras after some years of eclipse. In both works during tonight's first half they played out if their skins. Stephen Hough, although Mr Cool, gave a performance of the Rachmaninov that was full of insight, detail and precision. A refreshing performance.

                I'm very fond of Prokofev's C minor symphony and arrogantly thought that I knew it backwards. Not five minutes had elapsed before I realised that Alexander Vedernikov understood it inside out. I was glad to learn from his insights for I've become disenchanted,recently, with SP's 5th, and have relegated his 4th and 6th symphonies to the second rank.

                I felt that the structure of Prokofiev's first movement gained so much from AV's appreciation of he detail, allied to a firm grasp of the movement's structure and direction. Great interpretation made real by an orchestra as hot as the Fiery Angel. An unforgettable performance and a landmark in Prokofiev interpretation.

                I wanted more a touch more awe and mystery at the start of the second movement but, again, the detail was compelling with some excellent work from the bass department led by the bass clarinet. The conductor is adept at conducting slow movementps in a manner that retains vibrancy - this certainly wasn't slow and dreary. I heard a welcome pre-echo of Carl Nielsen.

                Furioso! Is there a composer who projects a malignant moto perpetuoso better than Prokofiev? It felt like the invasion of a million microbes across my skin. The sorcerer intervenes to create order from frenetic chaos. I admire the way AV shapes lines, builds paragraphs and delivers satisfying structures.

                On to the bleak, malevolent finale, full of threatening gravitas. It's easy to relax after the opening measures, AV didn't. The war of good versus evil was joined and its outcome felt uncertain. The slower music predicted similar desolate, battle-worn moments in Shostakovich. Did the upper strings add a tad too much warmth and hope? The growling bassoon soon extinguished such thoughts as the clockwork War sprang back with elemental force now reinforced by heavy metal. The end- a frightening shriek followed by a fulsome chord leaves the battle unresolved.

                A superb performance from conductor and orchestra. This is the stuff from which fine Proms are made!
                Last edited by edashtav; 23-08-16, 20:40. Reason: Sloppiness

                Comment

                • Lat-Literal
                  Guest
                  • Aug 2015
                  • 6983

                  #9
                  Originally posted by edashtav View Post
                  Full marks bsp for characterising tonight's Hamlet. T?he BBC SO have re-established their domination over the other BBC orchestras after some years of eclipse. In both works during tonight's first half they played out if their skins. Stephen Hough, although Mr Cool, gave a performance of the Rachmaninov that was full of insight, detail and precision. A refreshing performance.

                  I'm very fond of Prokofev's C minor symphony and arrogantly thought that I knew it backwards. Not five minutes had elapsed before I realised that Alexander Vedernikov understood it inside out. I was glad to learn from his insights for I've become disenchanted,recently, with SP's 5th, and have relegated his 4th and 6th symphonies to the second rank.

                  I felt that the structure of Prokofiev's first movement gained so much from AV's appreciation of he detail, allied to a firm grasp of the movement's structure and direction. Great interpretation made real by an orchestra as hot as the Fiery Angel. An unforgettable performance and a landmark in Prokofiev interpretation.

                  I wanted more a touch more awe and mystery at the start of the second movement but, again, the detail was compelling with some excellent work from the bass department led by the bass clarinet. The conductor is adept at conducting slow movementps in a manner that retains vibrancy - this certainly wasn't slow and dreary. I heard a welcome pre-echo of Carl Nielsen.

                  Furioso! Is there a composer who projects a malignant moto perpetuoso better than Prokofiev? It felt like the invasion of a million microbes across my skin. The sorcerer intervenes to create order from frenetic chaos. I admire the way AV shapes lines, builds paragraphs and delivers satisfying structures.

                  On to the bleak, malevolent finale, full of threatening gravitas. It's easy to relax after the opening measures, AV didn't. The war of good versus evil was joined and its outcome felt uncertain. The slower music predicted similar desolate, battle-worn moments in Shostakovich. Did the upper strings add a tad too much warmth and hope? The growling bassoon soon extinguished such thoughts as the clockwork War sprang back with elemental force now reinforced by heavy metal. The end- a frightening shriek followed by a fulsome chord leaves the battle unresolved.

                  A superb performance from conductor and orchestra. This is the stuff from which fine Proms are made!
                  A great review which makes up for the absence of people from the broadsheets. Only representatives from The Times and The Independent seem to have been there. I am not so keen on the Prokofiev work but I very much enjoyed the Tchaikovsky and the Rachmaninov and thought that the orchestra was superb, especially during the first. Stephen Hough was, of course, very good indeed as were the short interviews on R3 with him and Vedernikov and the discussion in the interval on the devil. "Moscow Nights". For some reason I always mix that up in my mind with "Dark Eyes" which is odd because I used to be able to play the latter adequately on the guitar. Anyhow, I digress. It was another 4.5 out of 5.
                  Last edited by Lat-Literal; 07-09-16, 16:32.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X