Prom 17: 28.07.16 - Roger Norrington conducts Berlioz, Beethoven and Brahms

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eine Alpensinfonie
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 20570

    Prom 17: 28.07.16 - Roger Norrington conducts Berlioz, Beethoven and Brahms

    19:30 Thursday 28 Jul 2016
    Royal Albert Hall

    Hector Berlioz: Beatrice and Benedict – overture
    Ludwig van Beethoven: Piano Concerto No. 4 in G major
    Johannes Brahms: Symphony No 1 in C minor


    Robert Levin piano
    Stuttgart Radio Symphony Orchestra (SWR)
    Sir Roger Norrington conductor



    Last edited by Eine Alpensinfonie; 01-08-16, 16:34.
  • Cockney Sparrow
    Full Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 2284

    #2
    I think I heard, well "half heard" Martin Handley saying this is likely to be an emotional evening for the orchestra. A quick Google shows it is due to merge with SWR Orchestra in 2016. Is this their last concert, or perhaps their last with Norrington? Can anyone add more authoritative information?

    (For my money these German radio Symphony Orchestras are pretty damn good and not to be thought of as less than top rank).
    Last edited by Cockney Sparrow; 26-07-16, 19:50. Reason: Predictive text! Now corrected.

    Comment

    • Cockney Sparrow
      Full Member
      • Jan 2014
      • 2284

      #3
      (sorry - predictive text. How do I edit on a mobile i wonder ?

      Comment

      • bluestateprommer
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 3009

        #4
        Originally posted by Cockney Sparrow View Post
        I think I heard, well "half heard" Martin Handley saying this is likely to be an emotional evening for the orchestra. A quick Google shows it is due to merge with SWR Orchestra in 2016. Is this their last concert, or perhaps their last with Nottingham. Can anyone add more authoritative information?

        (For my money these German radio Symphony Orchestras are pretty damn good and not to be thought of as less than top rank).
        Yes, you heard Martin Handley correctly, as this will be the Stuttgart RSO's final concert before the merger:



        Rough translation of the text:

        "Big stage for the last concert of the Stuttgart Radio Symphony Orchestra: at the legendary BBC Proms, Sir Roger Norrington conducts works by Berlioz, Beethoven and Brahms. Live on SWR2."

        Comment

        • Maclintick
          Full Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 1076

          #5
          Originally posted by Cockney Sparrow View Post
          I think I heard, well "half heard" Martin Handley saying this is likely to be an emotional evening for the orchestra. A quick Google shows it is due to merge with SWR Orchestra in 2016. Is this their last concert, or perhaps their last with Norrington? Can anyone add more authoritative information?

          (For my money these German radio Symphony Orchestras are pretty damn good and not to be thought of as less than top rank).


          Yes -- these 2 ensembles are, as with all "provincial" orchestras in Germany, of exceptionally high quality, but possessing divergent artistic aims -- SWR Baden-Baden leaning towards contemporary repertoire, & Stuttgart aligned with HIPP -- esp. under Norrington's direction.How this will work out is uncertain....

          Comment

          • Eine Alpensinfonie
            Host
            • Nov 2010
            • 20570

            #6
            Roger Norrington has made the claim that orchestras played with little or no vibrato until the 1930s.

            Why did he say this?

            a) Because it’s true?
            b) Because he would like it to be true?
            c) Because he believes it to be true?
            d) Because he has evidence that it’s true?
            e) Because it gives credibility to his preferred performance style?

            A few months ago, Bryn and I had an exchange of posts on the matter on this forum, expressing different points of view. Perhaps without realising it, Bryn came up with a new Norrington-backing argument. I cited Elgar’s first recording of Carissima, made in 1914, which has all the evidence you need that the string players were using continuous vibrato. Bryn suggested that the players only used vibrato to compensate for the weak sound of acoustic recordings - something I regarded as clutching at straws.

            But, unlikely as it seems, could this have been a defining moment? Could it be that this did indeed happen, and the resulting richness of tone pleased conductors and players so much, that they continued to play in this way at other times? It’s a compelling idea. Of course, there are counter-arguments. The number of recording bands/orchestras was very small, so the idea would not have spread quickly. Critics of 90-100 years ago would appear not to have noticed this fundamental change. And it’s convenient that early films of orchestras playing happen to have been made later than this.

            Nevertheless, I concede that Bryn may have hit upon the key to the solution.

            Comment

            • Sir Velo
              Full Member
              • Oct 2012
              • 3229

              #7
              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post

              But, unlikely as it seems, could this have been a defining moment? Could it be that this did indeed happen, and the resulting richness of tone pleased conductors and players so much, that they continued to play in this way at other times? It’s a compelling idea. Of course, there are counter-arguments. The number of recording bands/orchestras was very small, so the idea would not have spread quickly. Critics of 90-100 years ago would appear not to have noticed this fundamental change. And it’s convenient that early films of orchestras playing happen to have been made later than this.

              Nevertheless, I concede that Bryn may have hit upon the key to the solution.
              This seems highly implausible to me. It's barely conceivable that musicians would have been able to play continous vibrato entirely off the cuff so convincingly if it weren't already imbued in their technique. There are numerous accounts of string players applying vibrato during the 19th century and either being admonished or praised for this practice (eg Ysaye and his teacher).

              Comment

              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 20570

                #8
                Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post
                This seems highly implausible to me. It's barely conceivable that musicians would have been able to play continous vibrato entirely off the cuff so convincingly if it weren't already imbued in their technique. There are numerous accounts of string players applying vibrato during the 19th century and either being admonished or praised for this practice (eg Ysaye and his teacher).
                I think it's implausible too, but I'm looking for a way of explaining a much vaunted claim.

                Comment

                • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                  Gone fishin'
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 30163

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post
                  It's barely conceivable that musicians would have been able to play continuous vibrato entirely off the cuff so convincingly if it weren't already imbued in their technique. There are numerous accounts of string players applying vibrato during the 19th century and either being admonished or praised for this practice (eg Ysaye and his teacher).
                  But this is not the claim being made - "little or no vibrato" (as you can hear in Norrington's performances) means that the continuous and (often) unvaried vibrato that became customary in the Twentieth Century wasn't the norm in earlier performances; instead, vibrato was used with discretion, and at varying degrees within performances as an expressive device.

                  Whether early recording studio techniques were responsible for the change to the 20th Century sound, however, I don't know.
                  [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                  Comment

                  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                    Gone fishin'
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 30163

                    #10
                    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                    Whether early recording studio techniques were responsible for the change to the 20th Century sound, however, I don't know.
                    Something rather irreverent occurs to me - it might not be a matter of needing to make louder sounds as much as the string players, hearing themselves for the first time as a result of these recordings, used the old fiddlers' trick of splashing the vibrato on all over like Brut 33 in order to cover up inaccurate intonation?
                    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                    Comment

                    • Eine Alpensinfonie
                      Host
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 20570

                      #11
                      Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                      . . . means that the continuous and (often) unvaried vibrato that became customary in the Twentieth Century wasn't the norm in earlier performances . . .
                      The evidence (other than statements of faith)?

                      Comment

                      • Serial_Apologist
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 37699

                        #12
                        Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                        Something rather irreverent occurs to me - it might not be a matter of needing to make louder sounds as much as the string players, hearing themselves for the first time as a result of these recordings, used the old fiddlers' trick of splashing the vibrato on all over like Brut 33 in order to cover up inaccurate intonation?
                        Wouldn't a mass simultaneous vibrato by say a violin section result in a kind of shimmer effect, rather than poor intonation? It's difficult to "hear" such a thing in one's head, or for that matter imagine a body of strings all wobbling together in perfect synchronicity!

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20570

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                          Wouldn't a mass simultaneous vibrato by say a violin section result in a kind of shimmer effect, rather than poor intonation? It's difficult to "hear" such a thing in one's head, or for that matter imagine a body of strings all wobbling together in perfect synchronicity!
                          A full string section using vibrato doesn't normally sound wobbly at all - it just enriches the tone.

                          Comment

                          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                            Gone fishin'
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 30163

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                            The evidence (other than statements of faith)?
                            Well, the fact that Ysaye was told off by his teacher for using it all the time, and the use of con vibrato expression marks in scores, for example.
                            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                            Comment

                            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                              Gone fishin'
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 30163

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                              Wouldn't a mass simultaneous vibrato by say a violin section result in a kind of shimmer effect, rather than poor intonation? It's difficult to "hear" such a thing in one's head, or for that matter imagine a body of strings all wobbling together in perfect synchronicity!
                              But in those earliest recordings, it wasn't a "mass ... violin section" - just a handful of players crammed around a recording horn.

                              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X