Prom 70: Tchaikovsky/Rachmaninov/Rimsky-Korsakov (7.09.15)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eine Alpensinfonie
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 20575

    Prom 70: Tchaikovsky/Rachmaninov/Rimsky-Korsakov (7.09.15)

    19:30
    Royal Albert Hall

    Tchaikovsky: Francesca da Rimini
    Rachmaninov: Piano Concerto No. 2 in C minor
    Rimsky-Korsakov: Scheherazade

    Nikolai Lugansky (piano)
    St Petersburg Philharmonic Orchestra
    Yuri Temirkanov (conductor)

    Just over a decade since their most recent visit, the St Petersburg Philharmonic and its renowned Artistic Director and Chief Conductor, Yuri Temirkanov, return to the Proms with a homegrown programme of Russian greats. Pianist Nikolai Lugansky is the soloist in Rachmaninov's most famous work, the Second Piano Concerto, with its lyrical slow movement and brilliant, virtuosic finale. Rimsky-Korsakov's Scheherazade dissolves the magic and colour of the tales of the Thousand and One Nights into a glittering musical tapestry that the composer himself described as 'an oriental narrative of fairy-tale wonders'. Tchaikovsky's swirling tone-poem of doomed lovers opens the programme.
    Last edited by Eine Alpensinfonie; 31-08-15, 19:48.
  • Eine Alpensinfonie
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 20575

    #2
    Although still the fine orchestra it was in the Leningrad days, the sound seems to have become more "western" in recent years.

    Comment

    • Eine Alpensinfonie
      Host
      • Nov 2010
      • 20575

      #3
      Francesca da Rimini is in many ways Tchaikovsky at his finest - superb orchestration, structurally concise and mingling drama with subtlety.

      Comment

      • mrbouffant
        Full Member
        • Aug 2011
        • 207

        #4
        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
        Francesca da Rimini is in many ways Tchaikovsky at his finest - superb orchestration, structurally concise and mingling drama with subtlety.
        Concise at c.25 minutes?.... It's hardly Webernesque in its brevity ;-)

        Comment

        • Bax-of-Delights
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 745

          #5
          Originally posted by mrbouffant View Post
          Concise at c.25 minutes?.... It's hardly Webernesque in its brevity ;-)
          The Proms website puts it at 18 minutes and Stokowski (my favourite interpreter) did it just under 19.

          I shall be there this evening.
          O Wort, du Wort, das mir Fehlt!

          Comment

          • mrbouffant
            Full Member
            • Aug 2011
            • 207

            #6
            Originally posted by Bax-of-Delights View Post
            The Proms website puts it at 18 minutes and Stokowski (my favourite interpreter) did it just under 19.

            I shall be there this evening.
            I shall be there too.

            Interestingly the recording I have been listening to mostly (Bernard Haitink and the Royal Concertgebouw) comes in at 24' 37". Sedate.
            Last edited by mrbouffant; 07-09-15, 12:58.

            Comment

            • Eine Alpensinfonie
              Host
              • Nov 2010
              • 20575

              #7
              Originally posted by Bax-of-Delights View Post
              The Proms website puts it at 18 minutes and Stokowski (my favourite interpreter) did it just under 19.
              Markevitch takes over 23 minutes. That is slow!

              Comment

              • Darkbloom
                Full Member
                • Feb 2015
                • 706

                #8
                Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                Although still the fine orchestra it was in the Leningrad days, the sound seems to have become more "western" in recent years.
                No horn wobble these days? I haven't heard them at all since the recordings with Mravinsky, where they play like absolute demons. It's one of those pairings where you feel, intellectually, that he puts it all on too tight a leash but the results are so blistering that you can't be anything but awed by it. A part of me still wishes they were called the Leningrad (not that it would make much sense) because just the name of that orchestra gives me the chills. It's hard to hear his Tchaikovsky 4 and then turn anyone else's and not feel slightly disappointed.

                Comment

                • Barbirollians
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 11763

                  #9
                  A very unadventurous programme although Scheherazade does not seem to appear in the concert hall as often as it once did . Shame we could not have had a Medtner concerto for example .

                  Comment

                  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                    Gone fishin'
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 30163

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
                    A very unadventurous programme although Scheherazade does not seem to appear in the concert hall as often as it once did . Shame we could not have had a Medtner concerto for example .
                    Oh, but Barbi - I cannot see how as a programme it does not represent many (OK, "three") of the finest works in the repertoire played by [an]orchestra[] of the highest rank with [a] top class soloist[] and conductor[]. Not a single fart nor e'er a raspberry on offer.
                    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                    Comment

                    • Barbirollians
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 11763

                      #11
                      I said Medtner not Lachenmann !

                      Comment

                      • teamsaint
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 25231

                        #12
                        Has Termikanov repented of his sexism sins, at all ?
                        I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                        I am not a number, I am a free man.

                        Comment

                        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                          Gone fishin'
                          • Sep 2011
                          • 30163

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
                          I said Medtner not Lachenmann !


                          (But did you Medtner say it?


                          Medtner ... meant to ...





                          Anyone seen my coat?)
                          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                          Comment

                          • teamsaint
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 25231

                            #14
                            Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post


                            (But did you Medtner say it?


                            Medtner ... meant to ...





                            Anyone seen my coat?)
                            Are you worried that the quality of your pun was Lachen,mann ?

                            groan, also seasonal outer garment requiring collection.....
                            I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                            I am not a number, I am a free man.

                            Comment

                            • Keraulophone
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 1972

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Darkbloom View Post
                              A part of me still wishes they were called the Leningrad (not that it would make much sense) because just the name of that orchestra gives me the chills. It's hard to hear his Tchaikovsky 4 and then turn anyone else's and not feel slightly disappointed.
                              I also have had the same two thoughts. One gets the impression in those staggering '50s/'60s recordings that a wrong note or entry might result in the player being exiled to deepest Siberia. The Leningrad Phil story that moves me the most was the occasion of a rehearsal performance that he felt to have been so perfect that Mravinsky cancelled the concert, believing that it was not possible to repeat it to the same standard that evening. I hope Temirkanov doesn't do that (today or tomorrow - I'll be at both)!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X