It's an individual experience , experienced sometimes as a collective experience, since all experience is inside our own minds.
Following on from applause
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostDiscuss.
Listening to your music in your sitting room (but not a live concert radio broadcast - see above) is not. It's a private solitary thing.
The two things are mutually exclusive and must not be mixed up!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostA concert is something like a communal bathroom or garden that is shared or used by members of a group or community.
Listening to your music in your sitting room (but not a live concert radio broadcast - see above) is not. It's a private solitary thing.
The two things are mutually exclusive and must not be mixed up!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostQuite so. You can be as antisocial and selfish as you like in your own home, but perhaps not in a public concert.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... I think Pascal wd have thought that 'going out to a public concert' was in itself a 'distraction' to be eschewed...
«Tout le malheur des hommes vient d’une seule chose, qui est de ne savoir pas demeurer en repos dans une chambre»
... to know how to be 'at rest' is a competence that has to be acquired.
Not at all sure what Gus would have thought..."...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by underthecountertenor View PostPerhaps David-G would be prepared to lend you the contraption he wore at the ROH Guillaume Tell, to distracting if hilarious effect. He may even have patented it by now, following my suggestion, as the Regiemask (available in all opera house shops and larger branches of Robert Dyas).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View PostJust caught up - dans ma chambre - with the television broadcast of the NYO Mahler 9. Now that was a strange experience - rapturous applause plus a bijou talk-ette from Elder after each movement.
Not at all sure what Gus would have thought...
Of course he addressed the audience communally, rather than going round and talking to people individually. That would have taken too long and the concert was around 2 hrs 45 in the first place.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostYou definitely cannot be as antisocial and selfish as you like at a public concert, that much is true. But by definition you cannot be antisocial or selfish undertaking a private, solitary listening session in your sitting room.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostOf course he addressed the audience communally, rather than going round and talking to people individually. That would have taken too long and the concert was around 2 hrs 45 in the first place.
Rather like Breakfast: It is constructed to have maximum appeal for those who only want to listen for about 20-30 mins, while busy doing other things. The appeal for those who have longer to listen is considerably lessened unless they want to keep hearing the same news and weather, the same trails, the same exhortations to text, tweet or email in on the current topic. Not to be mixed up with a music programme, and to be avoided if you want a music programme.
The 'communal' idea of concert-going may be an attraction for those who enjoy experiencing other people's reactions to listening, who in fact feel that it enhances their own enjoyment. So be it. That's fine. But enjoying the 'experience' of being at a live concert with others is not to be 'mixed up' with appreciating the music and the performance.
Some people (apparently) feel it's all part of one rich, multi-faceted experience, others may feel that the presence of others is just a necessary evil if you want to hear live music.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostThe 'communal' idea of concert-going may be an attraction for those who enjoy experiencing other people's reactions to listening, who in fact feel that it enhances their own enjoyment. So be it. That's fine.
But enjoying the 'experience' of being at a live concert with others is not to be 'mixed up' with appreciating the music and the performance.
Some people (apparently) feel it's all part of one rich, multi-faceted experience,
others may feel that the presence of others is just a necessary evil if you want to hear live music.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostBut enjoying the 'experience' of being at a live concert with others is not to be 'mixed up' with appreciating the music and the performance.
.
I'm not sure that your separation always (it obviously does sometimes) makes sense.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostGood luck to them - to me that sounds horrible! But then I'm suspicious of anything that has to have 'rich' and 'multi-faceted' in front of it!
There seem to be different nuances to 'communal'. For some 'sharing the same experience' with all the others is important to them. For others, as I said, the presence of others is a necessary evil. This was Pliable's starting point: that if attending live music concerts, the presence of others is unavoidable, not part of the pleasure of the experience. For Master Jacques, people who find the actions of others distracting and spoiling their enjoyment, they've just got to put up with it because that's the way things are. Those whose enjoyment is spoiled are in the wrong.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment