"The right to bare arms" and the Elder"states"man.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard Tarleton

    #31
    Originally posted by doversoul View Post
    #15
    .
    Sorry, missed that!

    Comment

    • kea
      Full Member
      • Dec 2013
      • 749

      #32
      What a perfectly ridiculous thing to object to. (And somewhat misogynistic, but I suppose I must expect that around here...) No one goes to concerts for the musicians' outfits.

      (I personally wouldn't care if the members of the orchestra wore casual clothes—as they often do at rehearsals—or dressing-gowns, or enormous fur coats, or chain mail, or nothing whatsoever. So long as it doesn't impede them from playing their instruments.)

      Comment

      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
        Gone fishin'
        • Sep 2011
        • 30163

        #33
        Originally posted by kea View Post
        What a perfectly ridiculous thing to object to. (And somewhat misogynistic, but I suppose I must expect that around here...) No one goes to concerts for the musicians' outfits.

        (I personally wouldn't care if the members of the orchestra wore casual clothes—as they often do at rehearsals—or dressing-gowns, or enormous fur coats, or chain mail, or nothing whatsoever. So long as it doesn't impede them from playing their instruments.)
        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

        Comment

        • Eine Alpensinfonie
          Host
          • Nov 2010
          • 20577

          #34
          Originally posted by kea View Post

          (I personally wouldn't care if the members of the orchestra wore casual clothes—as they often do at rehearsals—or dressing-gowns, or enormous fur coats, or chain mail, or nothing whatsoever. So long as it doesn't impede them from playing their instruments.)
          I used to think that, but then Nigel Kennedy came along. . .

          Comment

          • Serial_Apologist
            Full Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 37928

            #35
            I just get my head down and listen - even with jazz: for me that's what music's for. I don't go to ballet or opera. The only time I had to get up and look was a Proms performance of Ives 4's second movement.

            Comment

            • MrGongGong
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 18357

              #36
              Some people really enjoy telling women what to wear
              too much
              too little

              Some performances require costumes
              though the ones that orchestras often wear don't seem to work well IMV

              Comment

              • doversoul1
                Ex Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 7132

                #37
                Originally posted by kea View Post
                What a perfectly ridiculous thing to object to. (And somewhat misogynistic, but I suppose I must expect that around here...) No one goes to concerts for the musicians' outfits.

                (I personally wouldn't care if the members of the orchestra wore casual clothes—as they often do at rehearsals—or dressing-gowns, or enormous fur coats, or chain mail, or nothing whatsoever. So long as it doesn't impede them from playing their instruments.)
                I know it makes you feel good to say all that but the point of this thread is not about what performers should/shouldn’t wear but it is about what women should/shouldn’t wear if they want to play in an orchestra. Or that's what Hornspieler who started the thread seems to be saying.

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 30610

                  #38
                  Interesting how often these differences of opinion boil down to those 'who care'/those 'who don't care'.

                  "Well, it doesn't bother me if … X"/"It bothers me (sometimes greatly) if … X".

                  Even when there would seem to be a general principle that might in many cases be acceptable to both sides, extraordinarily, it seldom is acceptable to both.
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                    Gone fishin'
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 30163

                    #39
                    Yeah - universal language, innit? Brings people together - so they can reach each other with their handbags/umbrellas etc etc.
                    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                    Comment

                    • Lat-Literal
                      Guest
                      • Aug 2015
                      • 6983

                      #40
                      Originally posted by french frank View Post
                      Interesting how often these differences of opinion boil down to those 'who care'/those 'who don't care'.

                      "Well, it doesn't bother me if … X"/"It bothers me (sometimes greatly) if … X".

                      Even when there would seem to be a general principle that might in many cases be acceptable to both sides, extraordinarily, it seldom is acceptable to both.
                      It could be tackled in another way. The principle could be based on who is saying whatever is being said. Beecham - he was a character and his contribution to music was such he could have said anything as far as I am concerned. It's trivial compared with his brilliance. Cameron to Eagle - "Calm Down Dear" - that just confirms for me everything about him.

                      Comment

                      • greenilex
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 1626

                        #41
                        Musicians in church are a different subset, I suppose?

                        Comment

                        • Hornspieler
                          Late Member
                          • Sep 2012
                          • 1847

                          #42
                          Originally posted by greenilex View Post
                          Musicians in church are a different subset, I suppose?
                          In my time, it was normal not to wear Evening Dress in a Cathedral or Church. (In fact, in Winchester Cathedral, the audience was treated more as a congregation and had almost to sit through high mass before and after the performance.
                          Audience applause was unthinkable.

                          It was deemed unchristian to charge people to enter the hallowed ground, but you had to pay to get out!

                          Thankfully, those days are behind us.

                          I seem to have started an argument here, but the reaction (and the number of replies) is certainly more than I had expected.

                          BTW: It seems strange that no comment has been made about the BSO's performance.

                          One of the most difficult symphonies in the repertoire. Did nobody listen in?

                          HS

                          NB I have a new email address if you wish to make personal contact.

                          It is horn.maester@gmail.com

                          Comment

                          • Serial_Apologist
                            Full Member
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 37928

                            #43
                            Originally posted by greenilex View Post
                            Musicians in church are a different subset, I suppose?
                            Yes - they're all surplice to requirements.

                            Comment

                            • Stanfordian
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 9339

                              #44
                              Originally posted by kea View Post
                              What a perfectly ridiculous thing to object to. (And somewhat misogynistic, but I suppose I must expect that around here...) No one goes to concerts for the musicians' outfits.

                              (I personally wouldn't care if the members of the orchestra wore casual clothes—as they often do at rehearsals—or dressing-gowns, or enormous fur coats, or chain mail, or nothing whatsoever. So long as it doesn't impede them from playing their instruments.)
                              Hiya Kia,


                              I do appreciate your viewpoint. I was trying to explain that it makes little sense to me that one group in the same orchestra is wearing the same clothes whilst the other group wear everything different. I am generally one of those that enjoy in the classical music world the custom and practice of orchestral players or soloists wearing smart dress even formal wear. Of course it doesn’t effect the music but it’s all part of the overall presentation, dressing up; to feel good, looking one's best, prepared for the special show. I remember Lang Lang in recital wearing a modern styled dinner suit and he looked smart and stylish and ready for the event, for the show. I also remember a well known British pianist who wearing a tatty, ill-fitting, everyday outfit that gave the impression that they have just finished cleaning the kitchen floor. Of course appearances do matter to some people and clearly not to others.
                              Last edited by Stanfordian; 02-09-15, 16:23.

                              Comment

                              • french frank
                                Administrator/Moderator
                                • Feb 2007
                                • 30610

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Lat-Literal View Post
                                It could be tackled in another way. The principle could be based on who is saying whatever is being said.
                                I would have said (for instance in this case) the principle would be that if those who say, "I personally wouldn't care if the members of the orchestra wore casual clothes—as they often do at rehearsals—or dressing-gowns, or enormous fur coats, or chain mail, or nothing whatsoever" were to give in to those who advocated some sort of comfortable uniformity for all players, everyone would be happy.

                                But would they be? I doubt it very much: people would find a dozen reasons for disagreeing
                                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X