Applause....I know, I know..........

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vinteuil
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 12955

    #76
    Originally posted by pureimagination View Post
    My own preference is silence from the audience between movements .... there doesn't seem to be a consensus of opinion
    ... as you wisely say, there is no consensus. There are pre-romantic HIPP purists like me who welcome applause between movements ; there are post-romantic purists like Alpensinfonie who abhor anything that disturbs the 'experience' of the Work Performed.

    Frankie say Relax

    Comment

    • Padraig
      Full Member
      • Feb 2013
      • 4251

      #77
      [QUOTE=vinteuil;501522
      Frankie say Relax [/QUOTE]

      So. It's the purists' fault, whichever way you look at it? Bad, bad purists.

      But, Frankie have got it right.

      Comment

      • vinteuil
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 12955

        #78
        Originally posted by Padraig View Post
        So. It's the purists' fault, whichever way you look at it? Bad, bad purists.

        But, Frankie have got it right.
        ... but some purists are 'welcoming' ; others 'abhor'.

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30511

          #79
          Hasn't the word 'purist' become unhelpful? It has a precise meaning, and it's disparaging depending on who's using it against whom.

          People either like to take in a symphony without audience intervention between movements or they prefer the intervention/aren't bothered.

          They can't both win. Neither is 'right' in any absolute sense. Both have their reasons for preferring one rather the other, or not caring tuppence.
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • jean
            Late member
            • Nov 2010
            • 7100

            #80
            When there is no consensus, it always seems to me that those who are disturbed by extraneous noise such as inter-movement applause are likely to be more upset by its presence than those who like it would be upset by its not being there.

            In such cases isn't it desirable to upset people as little as possible?

            (This is the argument I use when I try to get them to stop playing music in the swimming pool.)

            Comment

            • french frank
              Administrator/Moderator
              • Feb 2007
              • 30511

              #81
              Originally posted by jean View Post
              When there is no consensus, it always seems to me that those who are disturbed by extraneous noise such as inter-movement applause are likely to be more upset by its presence than those who like it would be upset by its not being there.
              Yes, I've always said if it's a battle in a 'voluntary' situation between those who want silence and those who want noise, the noisy ones 'win' every time.

              Though I'm not clear whether the 'clap between movements if you want to' people are really saying that noise during a piece of music is all right: cheer if you feel like it when there's a bit you enjoyed, clap during the music if you want to, make whatever noise you want to; or if they are drawing an arbitrary line between the noise they will accept and that which they won't.
              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

              Comment

              • Richard Tarleton

                #82
                OT, this reminds me of the arguments I used to have about smoking in shared spaces, being a bit militant about it. It was a binary thing. If others smoked in offices, restaurants, pubs etc., I was forced to share their smoke. I thought my right to clean air trumped theirs to pollute it with smoke. Silence, clean air, smoke, noise......

                Comment

                • DracoM
                  Host
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 12994

                  #83
                  Yes. With you 100%.

                  Comment

                  • Eine Alpensinfonie
                    Host
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 20575

                    #84
                    Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View Post
                    OT, this reminds me of the arguments I used to have about smoking in shared spaces, being a bit militant about it. It was a binary thing. If others smoked in offices, restaurants, pubs etc., I was forced to share their smoke. I thought my right to clean air trumped theirs to pollute it with smoke. Silence, clean air, smoke, noise......

                    Piped music in restaurants, shops, swimming pools etc. too.

                    Comment

                    • Beef Oven!
                      Ex-member
                      • Sep 2013
                      • 18147

                      #85
                      Doorbells that go beyond the necessary, ice-cream vans flagrantly violating the 15 second rule, a dog barking for no reason, a security light coming on just because someone has walked past, possessive apostrophe's in plurals................

                      I'm with RT et al 100% on this one.

                      Comment

                      • MrGongGong
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 18357

                        #86
                        People breathing near me
                        People with smelly hair
                        People with football shirts on when they aren't playing football
                        People I don't like appearing on the radio


                        and so on and so on

                        (120/75 )

                        Context?

                        Comment

                        • french frank
                          Administrator/Moderator
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 30511

                          #87
                          All good fun. No one has yet responded to my earlier point in Msg #88:

                          "Though I'm not clear whether the 'clap between movements if you want to' people are really saying that noise during a piece of music is all right: cheer if you feel like it when there's a bit you enjoyed, clap during the music if you want to, make whatever noise you want to; or if they are drawing an arbitrary line between the noise they will accept and that which they won't. "
                          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                          Comment

                          • Beef Oven!
                            Ex-member
                            • Sep 2013
                            • 18147

                            #88
                            Originally posted by french frank View Post
                            All good fun. No one has yet responded to my earlier point in Msg #88:

                            "Though I'm not clear whether the 'clap between movements if you want to' people are really saying that noise during a piece of music is all right: cheer if you feel like it when there's a bit you enjoyed, clap during the music if you want to, make whatever noise you want to; or if they are drawing an arbitrary line between the noise they will accept and that which they won't. "
                            Are we talking in respect of Proms, or any (classical?) concerts?

                            Comment

                            • french frank
                              Administrator/Moderator
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 30511

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Beef Oven! View Post
                              Are we talking in respect of Proms, or any (classical?) concerts?
                              It would apply at any concert where they play symphonies. Though it only seems to happen regularly at the Proms.
                              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                              Comment

                              • MrGongGong
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 18357

                                #90
                                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                                It would apply at any concert where they play symphonies. Though it only seems to happen regularly at the Proms.
                                So no consideration of context then?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X