Me and Mrs BBM, thoroughly enjoyed this performance. A really full-blooded sounding orchestra, choruses and soloists as well. Although, just where the soloists have their quartet, just before the final prestissimo, did the sound drop?
Prom 75 - 12.09.14: Cerha / Beethoven 9, Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra, etc., Gilbert
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostFashion IS largely gullibility. That does NOT mean that everyone who's opinions reflect a current fashion are themselves gullible.
Can you cite any performer working today who plays Music written in the early 19th Century in the way that it was performed in the 1940s? If they attempted to do so, wouldn't it justifiably be described as "quaint"?
The glories of the HIPP discoveries is that the Music is revealed in wonderful new ways to the receptive Musician - performing the work as it was done thirty and more years ago now sounds quaint
The glories of the HIPP discoveries is that the Music is revealed in wonderful new ways to the receptive Musician - performing the work now as it was done thirty and more years ago sounds quaint[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostCan you bring to mind any "fashion" ("current" or otherwise) that remained "in fashion" for over forty years?
Can you cite any performer working today who plays Music written in the early 19th Century in the way that it was performed in the 1940s? If they attempted to do so, wouldn't it justifiably be described as "quaint"?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostDifferent, maybe, but definitely not "quaint". That's just patronising.
Suggesting that performers who respect the composers' orchestrations, dynamics and structural markers - and who take time to research what might have been meant by, for example, Allegretto - are demonstrating "gullibility" is "patronizing" - not "just" patronizing, but unjust and disgraceful.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostNo, you are wrong; it isn't "just patronising". Altering the composer's orchestration and ignoring the markings in the score isn't being "different": it is precisely being "quaint".
Suggesting that performers who respect the composers' orchestrations, dynamics and structural markers - and who take time to research what might have been meant by, for example, Allegretto - are demonstrating "gullibility" is "patronizing" - not "just" patronizing, but unjust and disgraceful.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
Suggesting that performers who respect the composers' orchestrations, dynamics and structural markers - and who take time to research what might have been meant by, for example, Allegretto - are demonstrating "gullibility" is "patronizing" - not "just" patronizing, but unjust and disgraceful.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Postthe composer had to fudge the right hand because his piano only went up to F[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI often argue with myself. That way, I can guarantee to win (and lose) every time.
I suppose the key is to try not to come to blows about anything....
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
Comment