I'm sure that strict adherence to metronome marks is an excellent idea ........ and what should I do if there are none ?
Prom 62 - 3.09.14: Stuttgart RSO, Norrington
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Alison View PostWhy not just decide whether or not you like vibrato
- then go with performances to match ? Easy.
But Alpie also oversimplifies RN's stance - the key epithet is "indiscriminate" use of vibrato, as he made clear - and took pains to make clear - early in the discussion. There was plenty of vibrato last night in all three places, and lots of different types of vibrato, moreover. It just wasn't there all the time and all at the same intensity; instead, it was (or, more accurately "they were") used carefully at particular moments to give expressive "colours" when the conductor judged from the score that these were required. Interpretation based on study, in other words - the same principles encouraged in Furtwangler's Notebooks.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mercia View PostI'm sure that strict adherence to metronome marks is an excellent idea
and what should I do if there are none ?
A lot of work? Yes - that's the nature of performance practice, nowadays; and those who take such pains should be accorded respect for so doing, even if the results are not what we might prefer to hear.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostRN's stance - the key epithet is "indiscriminate" use of vibrato, as he made clear - and took pains to make clear - early in the discussion.
I shall listen again.Last edited by mercia; 04-09-14, 10:30.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mercia View PostI must have completely missed that in the discussion - where I picked up I thought he sounded quite black-and-white on the subject. No vibrato. Ever. (Then he said he was bored talking about it)
I shall listen again.
RN tends not to refer to the "indiscriminate" use of vibrato, but "permanent" vibrato, i.e. vibrato as the string players' fallback mode of tone production and projection. If there are those who cannot hear the sensitive use of vibrato in Stuttgarter/RN performances, they can watch and see its application.
I was only able to catch the first movement and part of the second of the Beethoven in the car during the drive back home from work yesterday. I am about to 'Listen Again' a find to what extent I concur with the negative comments re. the first and last movements of the Beethoven. Very much enjoyed the Dvorak, as expected.
Oh, and to Stravinsky's and Schoenberg's dislike of ubiquitous vibrato, you can add that of Cage and Feldman. I think it was via the former's String Quartet inf Four Parts that I first encountered the delights of what RN like to refer to as "pure tone" in a string quartet. So clean and unmuddied was it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostRN tends not to refer to the "indiscriminate" use of vibrato, but "permanent" vibrato, i.e. vibrato as the string players' fallback mode of tone production and projection.- when I typed "indiscriminate" I had a nagging feeling that I wasn't using RN's vocabulary.
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lento View PostA nagging doubt about Beethoven's metronome markings. Did he have sufficient hearing still to have an accurate perception of them?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostWell, they're visual aids as much as aural ones (many Musicians prefer the ones you can silence, to avoid the "click track" effect). And Maelzel (the inventor of the metronome as we know it, and of the "barrel organ" for which Beethoven wrote the Battle Symphony") regularly consulted the composer to seek asuggestions as to how the device might be improved.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lento View PostDoh: sorry, of course he could see it: my senior moment: no batteries in his time!
Comment
-
-
This thread wins the 2014 Most Tangential to An Actual performance award... 57 posts and what, about three have actually heard the metronome-controversial Beethoven 8th itself...? But then, me da capo, I'm always more interested in what performers do than what composers tell them to do...
Busy day, low blood sugar... better eat something...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostThis thread wins the 2014 Most Tangential to An Actual performance award... 57 posts and what, about three have actually heard the metronome-controversial Beethoven 8th itself...?
FWiW - I thought the Dvorak was a lovely performance, with the balance between symphonic drama and lyricism perfectly judged. A performance that reminded me what a splendid work this is when the conductor approaches what the composer wrote with insight and imagination - and how determinedly un-triumphant the conclusion is; in this performance, not that far from the mood at the end of Brahms' Fourth Symphony (in the same key). I'm less keen on Norrington's way with Beethoven and Berlioz, but this is just personal preference - nothing that Norrington and the orchestra did with the Music didn't arise from what is written in the scores.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment