Prom 15 - 28.07.14: BBC SO, Fliter / Pons

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Serial_Apologist
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 37833

    #61
    Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
    I would have been interested to hear the result. Could you fill any more details?

    Isn't this the cue for someone to have a dig at Ravel's superlative Mussorgsky orchestration?
    As far as I know Ravel never did actually re-orchestrate "La Mer"; I agree with you about "Pictures", having in my possession an LP with one side consisting of the original Boston SO under Koussevitzky recorded on 28 October 1930 with Ravel present, which to my ears, despite being Victrola Electronically Created Stereo, has never been bettered.

    Comment

    • Eine Alpensinfonie
      Host
      • Nov 2010
      • 20574

      #62
      Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
      As far as I know Ravel never did actually re-orchestrate "La Mer"; I agree with you about "Pictures", having in my possession an LP with one side consisting of the original Boston SO under Koussevitzky recorded on 28 October 1930 with Ravel present, which to my ears, despite being Victrola Electronically Created Stereo, has never been bettered.
      All I've been able to track down is the following from Wikipedia:

      Ravel wrote that Debussy’s “genius was obviously one of great individuality, creating its own laws, constantly in evolution, expressing itself freely, yet always faithful to French tradition. For Debussy, the musician and the man, I have had profound admiration, but by nature I am different from Debussy.” Ravel further stated, “I think I have always personally followed a direction opposed to that of the symbolism of Debussy.”

      They admired each other’s music and Ravel even played Debussy’s work in public on occasion. However, Ravel did criticize Debussy sometimes, particularly regarding his orchestration, and he once said, "If I had the time, I would reorchestrate La mer."

      By 1905, factions formed for each composer and the two groups began feuding in public. Disputes arose as to questions of chronology about their respective works and who influenced whom. The public tension caused personal estrangement. As Ravel said, “It is probably better after all for us to be on frigid terms for illogical reasons.”Ravel stoically absorbed superficial comparisons with Debussy promulgated by biased critics, including Pierre Lalo, an anti-Ravel critic who stated, “Where M. Debussy is all sensitivity, M. Ravel is all insensitivity, borrowing without hesitation not only technique but the sensitivity of other people.”During 1913, in a remarkable coincidence, both Ravel and Debussy independently produced and published musical settings for poems by Stéphane Mallarmé, again provoking comparisons of their work and their perceived influence on each other, which continued even after Debussy’s death five years later.

      Comment

      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
        Gone fishin'
        • Sep 2011
        • 30163

        #63
        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
        Isn't this the cue for someone to have a dig at Ravel's superlative Mussorgsky orchestration?
        I don't know that one - I only know the crass effort he had published.
        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

        Comment

        • Sir Velo
          Full Member
          • Oct 2012
          • 3262

          #64
          Originally posted by Hornspieler View Post
          I loved Chloe's leadership and solo passages and the woodwind in general were superb.
          Are we getting our Chloe's and Cleo's muddled by any chance?

          Comment

          • Sir Velo
            Full Member
            • Oct 2012
            • 3262

            #65
            Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
            Her memory lapse towards the end of the slow movement was a disturbing distraction from a haunting performance, and it threw the wind section off for a bar or so as they came in.
            I wonder if Ms Fliter was thrown by looking across at the leader and seeing her double staring back at her? Mme Velo mused what words were exchanged when they embraced: "Don't you dare ever wear that dress again when I'm playing!"

            BTW, anyone else think for two moments that Marianne Faithful had been dug up to give the prom?

            Comment

            • Eine Alpensinfonie
              Host
              • Nov 2010
              • 20574

              #66
              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
              I don't know that one - I only know the crass effort he had published.
              Ah, there you are Ferney.

              Comment

              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                Gone fishin'
                • Sep 2011
                • 30163

                #67
                Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                Ah, there you are Ferney.
                You rang, m'lord?
                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                Comment

                • Eine Alpensinfonie
                  Host
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 20574

                  #68

                  Comment

                  • jayne lee wilson
                    Banned
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 10711

                    #69
                    I always find the disdain fhg and others feel for the "Mussorgsky/Ravel" thing a bit disconcerting, because...

                    1)Some of us (probably way too many ) got to know and love it that way, in my case long before I was aware of it as a piano piece, (except as a brief mention in an intro). So that -
                    2) The piano version (sorry, original) sounded 2ndhand and dull after that, even while I (tried) to admire Richter's playing of it... but -
                    3) I don't think I'll ever want to hear Pictures again, such was its overexposure as that "Mussorgsky/Ravel" thing back in the day (probably still, now...)

                    I bought the Naxos/Kuchar version last, only realising too late that the desire had gone... I'll always think of it with affection though... it was a great piece to airconduct at the end..

                    Comment

                    • Bryn
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 24688

                      #70
                      Oh go on, jlw, try the Crabb/Draugsvoll version. That should reawaken your enjoyment of the work. Ah go on. You will, you will, you will.

                      Here's a sample for James Crabb's site.
                      Last edited by Bryn; 02-08-14, 20:11.

                      Comment

                      • Eine Alpensinfonie
                        Host
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 20574

                        #71
                        Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
                        I always find the disdain fhg and others feel for the "Mussorgsky/Ravel" thing a bit disconcerting, because...

                        1)Some of us (probably way too many ) got to know and love it that way, in my case long before I was aware of it as a piano piece, (except as a brief mention in an intro).
                        I wouldn't worry about what other people think. I think Ravel's (and other orchestrators' versions) 1000% better than the piano version that the composer never got round to orchestrate. Had Ravel not rescued the music from potential oblivion, Pictures might well have been a recently discovered cult piece with a limited audience.

                        Comment

                        • Bryn
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 24688

                          #72
                          Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                          I wouldn't worry about what other people think. I think Ravel's (and other orchestrators' versions) 1000% better than the piano version that the composer never got round to orchestrate. Had Ravel not rescued the music from potential oblivion, Pictures might well have been a recently discovered cult piece with a limited audience.
                          Though, of course, Ravel never got round to orchestrating all of it either, did he?

                          Comment

                          • jayne lee wilson
                            Banned
                            • Jul 2011
                            • 10711

                            #73
                            Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                            Oh go on, jlw, try the Crabb/Draugsvoll version. That should reawaken your enjoyment of the work. Ah go on. You will, you will, you will.

                            Here's a sample for James Crabb's site.
                            Absolutely fascinating...y'know, our conservatory floor got really flooded by the thunderstorm this afternoon...

                            Comment

                            • Eine Alpensinfonie
                              Host
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 20574

                              #74
                              Getting back to the concert...

                              Comment

                              • mercia
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 8920

                                #75
                                since it was the complete ballet, I for one would have found it interesting/helpful to have the story appear onscreen as surtitles in the way that it appears in the score at various moments (an opportunity missed ? )
                                Last edited by mercia; 03-08-14, 06:52.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X