Proms audience behaviour

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 30253

    #91
    Originally posted by Bryn View Post
    Indeed. Not during the music, but by all means between movements and at the end (unless specifically requested, whether verbally of by the actions of the conductor, to refrain until the end). I
    That seems like a non "compromise": i.e. you go on doing as you prefer rather than what other members of the audience might prefer.

    However, I presume you whole-heartedly approve of your hero in urging his audience to 'clap when they like' and egging them on to do so at the end as if trying to send the Clapometer spinning out of control. It isn't only one side which has 'fixed views'.
    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

    Comment

    • MrGongGong
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 18357

      #92
      Originally posted by french frank View Post
      Wouldn't that impy that all ways are equally valid, including being quiet at particular key moments? And wouldn't it be recognised that in a concert hall it isn't possible to have audible responses and silence simultaneously? And wouldn't a compromise be to encourage enthusiastic applause at some moments, and limit it at others?
      No, it doesn't imply that at all.

      Comment

      • Bryn
        Banned
        • Mar 2007
        • 24688

        #93
        Originally posted by french frank View Post
        That seems like a non "compromise" ...
        Certainly it's a compromise: that between clapping whenever (like opera lovers and balletomanes) and only at the very end. What could be clearer?

        Comment

        • jean
          Late member
          • Nov 2010
          • 7100

          #94
          But could the pleasure one person takes in clapping ever be equal to the pleasure another person might take in listening to music uninterrupted?

          It's nothing to do with not liking people; I enjoy the excitement at the end of a really good performance as much as anyone, and have been know to join in the odd standing ovation.

          It reminds me a bit of my local open-air swimming pool. Some people clearly feel that their desire to have music played while they swim outweighs mine to listen to the skylarks. Fortunately apart from a few awkward confrontations, I've usually prevailed.

          Even though I wouldn't mind a bit of Vivaldi (say) I wouldn't press for it; I think the default position in a swimming pool should be silence.

          Comment

          • Don Petter

            #95
            Originally posted by jean View Post
            I think the default position in a swimming pool should be silence.
            As with pubs and restaurants (and it's always that screaming woman).

            Comment

            • french frank
              Administrator/Moderator
              • Feb 2007
              • 30253

              #96
              Originally posted by Bryn View Post
              Certainly it's a compromise:
              I think not. What have you conceded, given that presumably even you wouldn't welcome applause while the music was going on?


              Gongers, does it imply, at least, that the rights of those who prefer silence are equal to the rights of those who prefer some sort of noise (clapping, whooping, whistling or whatever form it might take)?
              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

              Comment

              • Bryn
                Banned
                • Mar 2007
                • 24688

                #97
                It's not my compromise, but it is most certainly a compromise as regards those who, like the 'yeehoo' man, interrupt the sound producing part of a performance. I did not claim it as my compromise.

                For those who demand relative silence between movements, there is a technological solution. Buy a set of ultra-efficient noise cancelling headphones and pop them on,, sans input, for the duration of the hiatus between movements while watching the performers closely for clues as to when they will resume the performance. It might even aid concentration on the performance.

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 30253

                  #98
                  Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                  I did not claim it as my compromise.
                  My mistake - I should have been clear that I meant a compromise between those who favoured applause and those who favoured silence. Allowing those who favour applause to have their way while asking those who don't to buy an (expensive?) pair of noise cancelling headphones would provide a solution of sorts ...

                  For my part, I am quite resigned to putting up with noise in all sorts of situations, including "Quiet Coaches", libraries and eateries [/QUOTE]
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • Serial_Apologist
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 37614

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                    It's not my compromise, but it is most certainly a compromise as regards those who, like the 'yeehoo' man, interrupt the sound producing part of a performance. I did not claim it as my compromise.

                    For those who demand relative silence between movements, there is a technological solution. Buy a set of ultra-efficient noise cancelling headphones and pop them on,, sans input, for the duration of the hiatus between movements while watching the performers closely for clues as to when they will resume the performance. It might even aid concentration on the performance.
                    A sort-of personal anechoic chamber, in which the only interruptions to external stimuli are ones blood supply and nervous system in operation...

                    Comment

                    • teamsaint
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 25195

                      Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                      A sort-of personal anechoic chamber, in which the only interruptions to external stimuli are ones blood supply and nervous system in operation...
                      Life in the Fast Blaine.......
                      I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                      I am not a number, I am a free man.

                      Comment

                      • Flosshilde
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 7988

                        Originally posted by jean View Post
                        You can be sure someone will ignore him, though.
                        How can you be sure? Only by asking those people who clapped between movements during the full performance if they attended the season preview & heard the conductor ask them not to.

                        Comment

                        • jean
                          Late member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 7100

                          I'm working on it.

                          Comment

                          • MrGongGong
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 18357

                            Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                            A sort-of personal anechoic chamber, in which the only interruptions to external stimuli are ones blood supply and nervous system in operation...
                            Wot John said innit (except it wasn't strictly true )

                            Comment

                            • Serial_Apologist
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 37614

                              Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                              Wot John said innit (except it wasn't strictly true )
                              OT but there was a copy of "Silence" going for fifteen quid in the Whitechapel Gallery last week, so it must have had a reprint. I have a copy, but should have bought another for a friend who claims he gave me mine 40 years ago!

                              Comment

                              • MrGongGong
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 18357

                                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                                OT but there was a copy of "Silence" going for fifteen quid in the Whitechapel Gallery last week, so it must have had a reprint. I have a copy, but should have bought another for a friend who claims he gave me mine 40 years ago!
                                Bargain
                                you should have snapped it up !
                                It's had several reprints as far as I know
                                Classic text and essential reading , you could have sent it to our old academic chum

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X