Proms 2013 - the Verdict.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • teamsaint
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 25235

    #31
    License fee may be frozen, but income from it is rising........
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

    I am not a number, I am a free man.

    Comment

    • Flosshilde
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 7988

      #32
      Originally posted by pilamenon View Post
      a vacuous sound-bite from a performer instead. The crassest example of this being those back-stage interval chats.
      What could be called 'Metitis'

      Comment

      • agingjb
        Full Member
        • Apr 2007
        • 156

        #33
        Is it fair to deduce the attitude of the BBC to the Proms from the time that each Prom remains available on iPlayer?

        Comment

        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
          Gone fishin'
          • Sep 2011
          • 30163

          #34
          Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
          License fee may be frozen, but income from it is rising........
          In the sense of "salaries", sadly true.
          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

          Comment

          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
            Gone fishin'
            • Sep 2011
            • 30163

            #35
            Originally posted by agingjb View Post
            Is it fair to deduce the attitude of the BBC to the Proms from the time that each Prom remains available on iPlayer?
            Not really - the Beeb has some kind of contract with somebody that prevents them from making any Music broadcasts available on the i-Player for more than a week. Damned annoying, but not restricted to the Proms broadcasts.
            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

            Comment

            • RobertLeDiable

              #36
              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
              Not really - the Beeb has some kind of contract with somebody that prevents them from making any Music broadcasts available on the i-Player for more than a week. Damned annoying, but not restricted to the Proms broadcasts.
              It's the union agreement, with the Musicians' Union and the Incorporated Society of Musicians, I believe. It's true of most non-music programmes as well, though, so there must be other unions involved.

              Comment

              • Vile Consort
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 696

                #37
                Didn't some high-profile orchestras refuse to play at the proms because of the concert being available on the Internet for a week every time it is broadcast? Is this still the case?

                Comment

                • RobertLeDiable

                  #38
                  Originally posted by johnb View Post
                  The first few years under Roger Wright's control were mostly very good, or even outstanding, but then a lot of those would have been planned by Nicholas Kenyon.

                  Am I right in thinking that there was a comparative dearth in top rank visiting orchestras? If so, is it due to the expense (for the orchestras) of complying with the current visa controls, RW cutting back the costs or some other reason?

                  (Roger Wright seems to be extending his R3 philosophy to the Proms.)
                  Unlikely that more than one season would have been organised by Kenyon after he left except maybe for a few foreign orchestras. I wouldn't have thought there was a great dearth of top foreign orchestras, but maybe that depends how you define 'top rank'. Don't forget that the Berlin Staatskapelle, which definitely is top rank, did four nights in the Ring. As for cuts: the BBC is cutting across the board corporately, because of the freezing of the licence fee. Any cuts made by RW will have been handed down in percentage terms by his bosses and he'll just have to make the best of them.

                  Comment

                  • agingjb
                    Full Member
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 156

                    #39
                    Do these artists and their shop stewards really not think that sufficiently clever people (not me) can't capture their broadcasts as they are put out. It might be a good argument against radio.

                    Anyway, if public money is spent on securing performances, then those performances (not aways wonderful and the best of their kind in fact) should be in the public domain. Yes, I know they aren't going to be.

                    Comment

                    • Vile Consort
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 696

                      #40
                      Originally posted by agingjb View Post
                      Anyway, if public money is spent on securing performances, then those performances (not aways wonderful and the best of their kind in fact) should be in the public domain. Yes, I know they aren't going to be.
                      That would ensure nobody would ever perform for the BBC!

                      Comment

                      • agingjb
                        Full Member
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 156

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Vile Consort View Post
                        That would ensure nobody would ever perform for the BBC!
                        We pay them. They get the exposure and publicity. What more do they want?

                        Comment

                        • Il Grande Inquisitor
                          Full Member
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 961

                          #42
                          Originally posted by pilamenon View Post
                          with the Oslo PO/Petrenko not far behind
                          I'd agree.

                          David Mellor in today's Mail on Sunday described the Oslo Phil as 'provincial'. Silly tit.
                          Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency....

                          Comment

                          • Barbirollians
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 11789

                            #43
                            C+ - not a vintage year IMO .

                            Comment

                            • Ferretfancy
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 3487

                              #44
                              In real terms, the Proms are a real bargain for the BBC. For about £4-5m they can produce something like200 hours of radio, not counting later repeats, plus the TV coverage. Two or three people chatting in a TV studio with a few clips thrown in would cost out at about £60k' an hour, that's why daytime TV is seen to be a cheap way of filling time. Most people have little idea of how costly television and radio production is.

                              Comment

                              • french frank
                                Administrator/Moderator
                                • Feb 2007
                                • 30534

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Ferretfancy View Post
                                In real terms, the Proms are a real bargain for the BBC. For about £4-5m they can produce something like200 hours of radio, not counting later repeats, plus the TV coverage. Two or three people chatting in a TV studio with a few clips thrown in would cost out at about £60k' an hour, that's why daytime TV is seen to be a cheap way of filling time. Most people have little idea of how costly television and radio production is.
                                True. Someone worked out the average cost per concert compared with the cost of filling the same amount of TV time with something else. The fly in the ointment for the TV managers is that the Proms don't bring in as big an audience as 'something else'.
                                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X