I was pleased to see Tchaikovsky's 3rd Symphony finally being dusted off. It hasn't been heard at the Proms since 1965 when Malcolm Arnold conducted it (I wonder if a recording of that performance exists somewhere?). If the BSO and Karabits can bring the Albert Hall ceiling down at the end, in the way Beecham did in the Queens Hall in 1932, it ought to be a great revival. Here's Tommy on You Tube doing just that! ...
The actual Proms programme 12 July - 7 September
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Suffolkcoastal View PostSome 1st or 2nd halfs ok, but the other half totally uninteresting and often poorly programmed"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Charlie
After 'The Cosmic Dance', Caliban, on your bike!
BBC Proms - Prom 27: Naresh Sohal, Rachmaninov & Tchaikovsky
Comment
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostWell having gone through the whole season i think it is appalling.
Seven Wagner operas for crying out loud
- no doubt the obsessive Wagnerites will be wetting themselves with glee
whilst Verdi gets half a programme of arias and one concert of the Four sacred pieces and the odd other bit.
Whilst there is endless Lutoslawki and lots of Britten
The Alpine Symphony again ! They get as fine a violinist as Vilde Frang in and give her the Bruch 1 yawn . A last night of lots of little bits and pieces - what a shame Nigel Kennedy wasn't asked to dust off his Britten Concerto rather than Janine jansen . For no obvious reason meanwhile we get all the Tchaikovsky symphonies and not a single piece of Schubert outside the Lewis/Cooper late nght piano duo and scarcely any Mozart at all and no Haydn .
An extremely unbalanced and lousy season.
Yep, too little Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert - and, again, nothing by Ferneyhough, Barrett, Sciarrino, Dillon, Saunders, Cassidy, Parker, Finnissy, Dench, Babbitt, Clarke, Downie ... We can all always make a longer list of what's been missed out, and each of our lists will be very different from each other. But what there is is mouth-watering.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Charlie
I wonder what a balanced programme actually is, Barbirollians and ferneyhoughgeliebte? I would doubt that a perfectly balanced programme exists, at least not for everyone. Any suggestions?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charlie View PostI wonder what a balanced programme actually is, Barbirollians and ferneyhoughgeliebte? I would doubt that a perfectly balanced programme exists, at least not for everyone. Any suggestions?
1 Where the anniversary composers are given roughly equal prominence
2 Where there is a broad spread of repertoire and not a close to complete absence of Mozart, Haydn and Schubert
Would be a start . I regard a season as unbalanced as this as a lousy Proms season. That does not mean that there are not attractive concerts in but as a whole season it is poor .
FHGL - anyone who goes to the opera even occasionally will recognise the difference between a Wagner audience and that for any other composer . Wagner appears to attract passionate obsessives in a way no other composer does . I suspect that explains this grossly unbalanced season - they can guarantee big sell outs for all those works .
The treatment of Verdi is a disgrace . No Haydn at all , no orchestral Schubert - yet some works that were played last year back again . It is a badly planned season .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Charlie View PostI wonder what a balanced programme actually is, Barbirollians and ferneyhoughgeliebte? I would doubt that a perfectly balanced programme exists, at least not for everyone. Any suggestions?
But even when these wide parameters are followed, I can guarantee that there will be years that I would find the Season unbelievably dull, others which I thought were excellent, and the majority (as in this year) which included "unmissable" events and others that I wouldn't mind if I had to miss them.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
I wonder what happened to the idea of a cycle of RVW symphonies conducted by Andrew Manze with the BBC Scottish SO, which was billed last year thus: "Over the next few seasons Andrew Manze directs all nine Vaughan Williams symphonies with the BBC Scottish Symphony Orchestra, of which he is Associate Guest Conductor" ?
After the splendid concert of 4,5,6 last year, I had hoped to see him return this year. Happy to see 1 & 2 turn up in the listings, but no Mr. Manze, alas.
Comment
-
-
Stephen Whitaker
This summer's BBC Proms has surprised fans by making a desperate bid to gain street cred with a programme featuring rap and punk artists including former N-Dubz member Fazer (pictured) and New Wave group The Stranglers amid traditional classical concerts.
People who never go to the RAH, listen to or watch the broadcasts telling us what's wrong with the Proms.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Veronika View Post
The Monteverdi Choir Bach prom does sound very good, though!
bws
Chris S
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View PostI often find that and have to confess it makes the fortunate circumstance of living close to the RAH extra-advantageous - a couple of times a season, I jump on the bike when the first half's done and can be in the Arena by the time the interval's finished. I think I'll be doing that on 2 August (during the first of 2 intervals) for the Rachmaninov PC#3, then back home before the Tchaikovsky starts...
Comment
-
-
Charlie
I am in favour of unbalanced programmes, ferneyhoughgeliebte. The First Night of the Proms has the following programme, for example:
Julian Anderson
Harmony (c4 mins)
BBC Commission, World Premiere
Britten
Four Sea Interludes from 'Peter Grimes' (17 mins)
Rachmaninov
Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini (23 mins)
Lutosławski
Variations on a Theme by Paganini (8 mins)
INTERVAL
Vaughan Williams
A Sea Symphony (66 mins)
52 < 66
Where is the balance there? I suppose that the very word 'classical' implies some kind of balance, or symmetry, although perfect symmetry may not be required! It is therefore better to go for something unbalanced, Barbirollians, because an unbalanced programme is at least achievable!Last edited by Guest; 19-04-13, 13:31.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Suffolkcoastal View PostWish I was in your position Cali, sadly being over 100 miles away, I need to make sure I would like to listen to both halves. I would love to hear the RVW London Symphony live, however I just can't listen to a Concerto for Sitar I'm afraid, I just don't like the instrument. I would also like to have heard the Elgar Falstaff live, as we don't hear it enough, but I'm not interested in the Tchaikovsky, I've heard a good performance live of that already. Why all the Tchaikovsky this year including all the symphonies??? No comments so far on Verdi's poor treatment. Or on the snubbing of Hindemith and virtually so of Poulenc.
...the Caliboast!
It loved to happen. -- Marcus Aurelius
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Suffolkcoastal View PostWish I was in your position Cali, sadly being over 100 miles away, I need to make sure I would like to listen to both halves. I would love to hear the RVW London Symphony live, however I just can't listen to a Concerto for Sitar I'm afraid, I just don't like the instrument. I would also like to have heard the Elgar Falstaff live, as we don't hear it enough, but I'm not interested in the Tchaikovsky, I've heard a good performance live of that already. Why all the Tchaikovsky this year including all the symphonies??? No comments so far on Verdi's poor treatment. Or on the snubbing of Hindemith and virtually so of Poulenc.
Comment
-
-
Resurrection Man
Originally posted by Stephen Whitaker View Posthttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-concerts.html
People who never go to the RAH, listen to or watch the broadcasts .......
Comment
Comment