I wondered that too.
Mozart symphonies - who is going to play them in the future ?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostWhy ?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
heliocentric
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post(even though Mozart liked such things)?
If anyone prefers the sound of a "modern" orchestra that's up to them of course, and nobody could reasonably object; the problem here is that the idea of justifying one's personal taste on the grounds that the composer "would have" shared those preferences is totally spurious.
Comment
-
Simon
Without wanting to diminish the initial post, I can't help feeling that reports of the lack of Mozart are nothing much to worry about. The Proms are important in some ways, of course, but not in others and they only reflect one small section of the wide world of classical music. There's a natural BBC wish in the programming to cover all the usual trendy adjectives and so if that means programming some third rate stuff rather than Mozart, then it will happen. Someone - a professional musician - said to me yesterday that he hadn't bothered much with the Proms this year, as there was so much rubbish on. I can't comment, as I've been away and hardly glanced at the programme, but in my view in the past at any rate there has always been enough first rate stuff programmed to make them worthwhile.
But whatever happens at the Proms, or with Symphony orchestras, my bet is that there are thousands of music lovers across the world who will play Mozart symphonies on their own personal music systems on a very regular basis. And I'd bet there's at least one programmed with some orchestra fairly close to me within the next few weeks as well.
Predictions are often wrong and sometimes foolish, but I doubt many would disagree that some of Mozart's symphonies will be around, and will be being played, assuming the world continues as it is, for many centuries yet! So no real worries, I don't think.
Best wishes to all,
S-S!
Comment
-
Originally posted by heliocentric View PostI didn't know they existed! but I like his Beethoven concertos a lot.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostSomewhat OT, heliocentric, but what do you make of Arthur Schoonderwoerd's Mozart concerto recordings?
http://www.prestoclassical.co.uk/r/Accent/ACC24265
I had meant to get Bilson's set, and perhaps also Levin's, but it hasn't happened yet. Who else is in the running? Sofronitsky?
Re Schoonderwoerd, his recording(s) seem to be one instrument/part, which could be just too small and give a rather thin sound. It might be interesting (!!) but certainly in some of the later concerti I doubt whether Mozart intended that.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostRe Schoonderwoerd, his recording(s) seem to be one instrument/part, which could be just too small and give a rather thin sound. It might be interesting (!!) but certainly in some of the later concerti I doubt whether Mozart intended that.
Comment
-
-
The numbers of instruments used is claimed to be based on those Mozart actually experienced in early performances. When one recalls that he arranged at least some of the earlier concertos for string quartet and piano, it does call into question that he would have expected just one instrument per part as the norm. That was the challenging aspect I referred to. I'll dig out the programme notes and see if I can offer chapter and verse form them. Not right now though.
Comment
-
Comment