Originally posted by Bryn
View Post
Prom 60: Tuesday 30th August at 7.30 p.m. (Mozart, Bruckner)
Collapse
X
-
Roehre
-
Roehre
Originally posted by waldhorn View PostNOWAK is rubbish...!
I hope I'm not alone in finding this 'edition' of the 'only' great 8th symphony, with its irritating little gratuitious sub-themes and constipated 'counterpoints' to be trivialised and mauled almost beyond either recognition or redemption..?
Comment
-
amateur51
Originally posted by Bryn View PostWell I approve of the edition used, (though I am more used to the 1887 score these days), but not a lot else, so far. I wish I could find where I have put the DG Jochum set.
My fortnight's holiday start on Saturday.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roehre View PostIf it's rubbish, don't shout it, but give evidence, just PROVE it.
Bryn's explained the position of the Nowak vs. Haas debate with the 1890 version. For reasons he (and I) have explained before, we both think Nowak did a more responsible job, and Roehre clearly feels the same way. In Haas's defence, he didn't have the luxury of producing editions of both the 1887 and 1890 versions, so needed to find what he considered an ideal(ized) version.
If someone gives a great performance of the Haas version I'm hardly going to be disappointed - the differences are fairly trivial apart from Haas's interpolations, which would presumably be seen as producing even more of the "irritating little gratuitious sub-themes and constipated 'counterpoints' ..." and the like...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by makropulos View PostYes - and what is more, Nowak is not responsible for "irritating little gratuitious sub-themes and constipated 'counterpoints' to be trivialised and mauled almost beyond either recognition or redemption" - that sounds like a description of Bruckner by someone who doesn't like or understand Bruckner.
Bryn's explained the position of the Nowak vs. Haas debate with the 1890 version. For reasons he (and I) have explained before, we both think Nowak did a more responsible job, and Roehre clearly feels the same way. In Haas's defence, he didn't have the luxury of producing editions of both the 1887 and 1890 versions, so needed to find what he considered an ideal(ized) version.
If someone gives a great performance of the Haas version I'm hardly going to be disappointed - the differences are fairly trivial apart from Haas's interpolations, which would presumably be seen as producing even more of the "irritating little gratuitious sub-themes and constipated 'counterpoints' ..." and the like...
Comment
-
-
scottycelt
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostMagnificent Bruckner! Technically, musically, a triumph!
A sure and swift traversal of those great peaks and lovable valleys... so faithfully relayed.
Right now, no more words... Editions and discussions, for later.
The first two movements sounded a bit tame to me ... I much prefer 'earthy' Bruckner to 'saintly' ... but the slow movement was beautifully paced and the coda in the Finale as magnificent-sounding as it should always be.
Good to hear from Tom Service that the hall was 'full' .. I never know whether that means more than 'packed' or vice-versa.
Comment
-
scottycelt
Originally posted by makropulos View PostIsn't sleeping while you're standing up quite difficult, S-A? I mean, wouldn't you, er, fall down?
The Proms were where I first heard most of the Bruckner symphonies, so my earliest experiences of them were by standing. Perhaps that's why I ended up loving several of them.
Comment
-
prokkyshosty
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostEven so, I have enormous admiration for Prommers who have made themselves stand through this entire evening's concert. I have never been able to stay awake through any of Bruckner's symphonies.
Can the Brucknerians on the board answer me a question... are the two cymbal shots in this, and the one in the Seventh, the only percussion (other than timps of course) to appear in Bruckner? And were they added later, or only contained in these certain Nowak or Haas editions? Thanks in advance.
Comment
-
Originally posted by scottycelt View Postthe greatest performance of this stupendous work that I ever witnessed was the Haas version version with Wand and the BBCSO at the Proms in 1986 (I think)."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by scottycelt View PostI love 'em all, sitting down or standing on my head ... yes, even No 0 and 00 and all the revisions and doctored versions that others seem to be decidedly sniffy about ... just can't get enough Bruckner, me ...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by prokkyshosty View PostCan the Brucknerians on the board answer me a question... are the two cymbal shots in this, and the one in the Seventh, the only percussion (other than timps of course) to appear in Bruckner? And were they added later, or only contained in these certain Nowak or Haas editions? Thanks in advance.
The cymbal in the 7th is more contentious. The original score shows the clash but over the top someone, possibly Bruckner, has written nicht gelt (not valid). We don't know so conductors are free to include it or not."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
Comment