Excuse my absence, seeing I started this thread - for some reason I have been hugely distracted and busy since attending this concert. After the Gothic experience, this was the musical highlight of my year. I must admit I did quite enjoy the Barber, despite its hackneyed status, and the Bartok was quite fun though to my mind a little robotic. But the Bax! I have know this work for a very long time, but the impact of hearing it live at last was quite amazing. I was in the Gallery, and I must say the balance, including the organ, seemed very good to me up there. I have recently come to the conclusion that this is the place that has the best sound in the entire RAH. I find it difficult to understand the comments here by those who were left uninterested by this incredibly atmospheric, striking, colourful and brilliantly scored music. I suppose Bax's musical language is one that it takes a while to really get into, which is some excuse. But what pleased me most of all is that the capacity audience gave it a rousing reception, (Litton came back three times), and it was clear the piece made a big impression and is completely convincing in the context of 'mainstream' repertoire. I only hope this will inspire further Proms performance - in particular I think a complete Bax symphonic cycle is long overdue (are you listening, Mr. Wright?)
On the other hand, in my case it was the Prokofiev that left me rather cold - maybe I was just too jaded after the earlier excitement, but it struck me as one of his less interesting works, and in fact quite noticeably crude in conception and realisation after the Bax.
On the other hand, in my case it was the Prokofiev that left me rather cold - maybe I was just too jaded after the earlier excitement, but it struck me as one of his less interesting works, and in fact quite noticeably crude in conception and realisation after the Bax.
Comment