Perhaps they wre hoping she would wear the same dress as at the Hollywood Bowl?? http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...Lq4I_blog.html
Prom 43: Tuesday 16th August at 7.00 p.m. (Copland, Bax, Bartok, Barber, Prokofiev)
Collapse
X
-
David Underdown
-
BudgieJane
Originally posted by David Underdown View PostPerhaps they wre hoping she would wear the same dress as at the Hollywood Bowl?? http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...Lq4I_blog.html
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jane Sullivan View PostWho cares what the performers wear? It's the music that's important.
The NY Times article about the 'dime-a-dozen' young virtuosos was very interesting. It seems to be a common experience in conservatoires that works judged 'near impossible' a few decades ago are now cheerfully mastered, technically, by whole classes of 16-year-olds who can also handle anything else in the repertoire. Also the idea that some (older) professionals deliberately limit themselves to what they 'need' - the repertoire they want to specialise in.
I couldn't begin to judge Wang's performance against any other interpretations but as a live performance it was certainly impressive. At the risk of provoking a riot of indignation, I'm afraid I found the Bax rather uninvolving, whereas the Bartók took off right from the beginning.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
BudgieJane
Originally posted by french frank View PostAt the risk of provoking a riot of indignation, I'm afraid I found the Bax rather uninvolving
It's all very well people complaining about works being hardly ever heard. When they are played you immediately see why they are hardly ever heard.
Comment
-
No indignation intended here - I'd have expected that reaction from a proportion of those who heard it. But, the Bax symphonies are (along with much other worthwhile repertoire, surely) firmly in the category of works that won't reveal that much on a first "cold" hearing.
I had to listen to most of them a good few times (with the exception of the 4th) before they started to "click" - and the whole soundworld and structure is relatively unusual in any case.
In a way it's hard to judge whether this was a good performance of Bax 2 as there's nothing to compare it with other than recordings. My own reaction as not-a-Bax-o-phile was that much detail that isn't revealed in either the Lloyd-Jones or Handley recordings was revealed here, and that this is music worth occasional outings (i.e. more than every 40 years). I thoroughly enjoyed it, but I doubt that would have been the case if I wasn't sufficiently familiar with it from CDs. If I have a criticism of the performance, it's that it needed to be angrier with climaxes of even more sound and fury, including a good deal more welly from the organ. But that's a minor niggle in the context of a very good concert overall and the chance to hear Bax 2 at all.
There'd be no harm in dropping Bax 4 into a (like this one) well thought-out Prom at some point IMO, not least as it has more in the way of immediate appeal and drive.
Comment
-
-
I'd probably have done better if I'd copied my neighbouring Gallerians and sat on the floor, back to the orchestra, and let the sound wrap like a blanket over me.
Whereas for many the symphony is the height of musical achievement I tend to deconstruct it and fret about what the bit of tambourine-shaking meant (why was it there?). Don't get that feeling with a string quartet ...It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
I started listening to the Bax symphonies when they first appeared on the Lyrita label, and followed that up with Vernon Handley and others. I know that there have been some fine recorded performances, but I do feel that the particular type of rhetoric in them does not perhaps record very well. After all, you really need to hear them at a decent level, and that is not always possible. The experience at the Prom the other night was in quite another order. I thought I knew the second quite well, but it was much more revealing in the hall.
Comment
-
-
I'm a big fan of these three-parters - Brabbins did a fine one last year that included a very good James Dillon commission La Navette juxtaposed with Mozart, Liszt, Rimsky-K and one of the less often heard Tchaikovsky symphonies, while the Danish RSO/Dausgaard one with Langgaard's Music of the Spheres was probably my highlight of the 2010 season. This one was most enjoyable, too, and not the kind of fare I would associate with the RPO, who produced a sumptuous sound on FM and on this evidence are perhaps somewhat under-rated these days. Wonderful to hear that it was packed out - for whatever reason.
The Bax symphony impressed me deeply - I'd had a go with that Handley cycle several years ago and didn't really click with any except the 3rd. Probably not the way to approach them. Heard in isolation here, this No 2, whilst sounding clearly the work of a British composer, conveyed a refreshingly different sound-world from that of Elgar and VW, and had me pretty gripped throughout, despite or perhaps because of its meanderings. All three movements.
The Bartok PC2 was riveting, for me it's the clear pick of the three.
One of the top concerts of the season so far.
Comment
-
-
prokkyshosty
Originally posted by pilamenon View PostI'm a big fan of these three-parters - Brabbins did a fine one last year that included a very good James Dillon commission La Navette juxtaposed with Mozart, Liszt, Rimsky-K and one of the less often heard Tchaikovsky symphonies
My vote for the next one to be featured in this way is Darius Milhaud's 1st Symphony, a wonderful work which I'll probably never hear in concert. Or Nielsen 1-3? Vaughn Williams 4 or 6??
Comment
-
3rd Viennese School
Managed to miss the Bax twice! Had no idea it was on yesterday afternoon. First heard this one in March. Im trudging through the series. It’s a good symphony, with weird harmonies at time and quite aggresive!
Bartok Piano con 2- heard this. His concertos always soound different to the standard concertos and not easy to recall. I may get some Bartok concertos on CD. (I only have Piano con 1). The string chords in mvt 2 sound very nocturnal and nostalgic. It would be good to get to know these works a bit more.
Heard the Prokofiev 4 revised. When you hear this as a symphony in a concert item you immedialty notice how tuneful this is. First time I’ve heard this on the radio. For me the original is better but is that because I started with that one? The original sounds harder edged and more clearly defined in its outer mvts, with the ending being much more rough and aggressive sounding. The revised sort of takes this away. Although the revised mvt 2 is good, brings out the tune more. This is the finale of the prodigal son, the homecoming.
Anyway, the presenter seemed to have got the notes for this symphony mixed up with no.5 and no.6! And didn’t mentioned that this symphony was also banned!
Anyway, if any prom was worth attending this one certainly was! There should be more like this. Take out the Barber and Copland though.
3VS
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jane Sullivan View PostNo indignation from me.
It's all very well people complaining about works being hardly ever heard. When they are played you immediately see why they are hardly ever heard.
Comment
-
-
morebritishmusicplease
Originally posted by Bax-of-Delights View PostHi morebritishmusicplease,
I've just checked the proms archive and no.7 was last performed - wait for it! - 60 years ago exactly. .
Comment
Comment