I agree with you 100 per cent, John. I would prefer to hear live concerts every time with their elements of risk and the expectation of something fresh which happily I got in spades with this performance. Mind you, if this performance came out on CD I think I would be sorely tempted in my piggy bank . I do not think contracting would allow that, sadly.
Prom 13: Sunday 24th July: Verdi Requiem
Collapse
X
-
Mahlerei
Bychkov has recorded the Verdi Requiem for Profil. Urmana, Vargas, Furlanetto and Borodina the soloists.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EnemyoftheStoat View PostAccording to a Czech news report of Dec 2010 which I am unable to link to here for some reason:
"A year ago he [JB] received an offer to extend his contract but he did not accept it, saying his work with the orchestra was sufficiently long and it fulfilled both parties' expectations. However, he will be returning to the BBC Orchestra as a guest conductor.
Belohlavek will end in his current position in London with the last concert of the BBC Proms festival on September 8, 2012."
Interesting that no one else has noted this in any of the UK papers that might be inclined to care, such as Geoffrey Norris in the Telegraph (JB's main groupie among the UK critics). The only one who tried to trumpet this article at the time was, as if you needed to guess, Norman Lebrecht on his blog (it didn't catch on, needless to say, given NL's well known sensationalism and sloppiness).
Getting back to Bychkov, while I'll admit that NL is a pretty good interviewer, his penchant for stirring the pot showed at one point in that interview with Bychkov (accessible as a podcast from this page: http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/lebrecht), where NL tried to bait Bychkov into saying something nasty about Karajan. Bychkov didn't take the bait. However, in what one could call another bit of baiting, towards the end of the interview, we get to the point that EotS and IGI address, about Bychkov maybe as a candidate for future chief conductor of the BBC SO. In the interview, at least in a public forum, Bychkov did make clear that he really wasn't interested in any permanent position at this time (the BBC SO or anywhere else), with this quote (you can fast forward to about 42:00 in the podcast, but since I'm silly, I'm going to transcribe that post so you don't have to skip ahead ):
NL: "You're nearing 60. You've given up all your jobs. Would you be available for another job if it was offered?"
SB: "You know, it's a very hypothetical discussion."
NL: "It isn't. There are 2 huge vacancies in the States, Boston and possibly the Met."
SB: "No, no, it doesn't work like that. Life does not work like that. There is no game plan; there is no situation in which I will say 'Yes, I'm available; No, I'm not available', you know. It is not something where you come in and send your curriculum vitae, and you say 'I would like to be considered'. It just doesn't work like that. How it works, I can tell you.
At this stage in my life, for the first time after 40 years, of having been committed to, an institution and, at some point, two institutions, for the first time, I am only responsible to myself and for myself, for my work. It's an extraordinary feeling, absolutely extraordinary. And I see it in the way in which I am received everywhere I go, because I don't control. I am not perceived of controlling or dominating anybody's life. I bring them the music which is dear to me, I give them the very best of myself, and I get back every bit as much as I give, and plenty of affection and plenty of welcome, absolutely everywhere I go, I receive everywhere exactly the same welcome.
And why? And I think I know the answer. I have no luggage."
NL: "You're not a threat."
SB: "I'm not a threat. I only bring, share with them, music. What is important for me, about the pieces I conduct, I share it with them. And they are happy to give back so much. And I get so much, plenty. So the rest of it, minor details."
Of course, after the Muti debacle at La Scala a few years ago, Muti said much the same thing about not being tied down ('married', I suppose) to an orchestra or other music institution, and being able to guest-conduct anywhere he wanted. Then Chicago came along a few years later. Who knows then what may happen with Bychkov down the line, then?
BTW, did hear the iPlayer archive of the Verdi Requiem with Bychkov conducting; fine work all around, granted that the Verdi isn't my favorite work. I will say that in past times that I've heard the work, by the last time of the appearance of the "Dies irae" explosion, I sort of go "fine, fine, I get it already!", but not on this occasion, for what that's worth.
Comment
-
-
Absolutely intolerable mezzo!!
Exemplifying why by and large I steer away from opera houses, sadly You can pay 100s of £££ and be trapped in the building with that horrible noise
PS Back with enormous gratitude to the Britten relay via The Guardian - exemplifying why I do go to certain opera performances!!Last edited by Nick Armstrong; 21-08-11, 19:09. Reason: Update because The Turn of the Screw is awesome :-)"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View PostAbsolutely intolerable mezzo!!
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostRather like the soprano!Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Prommer View PostAnd FF is a star... Not sure if he was not well, just employing Method skills throughout...or very devout given some of the gestures.Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency....
Comment
-
-
Well I found that incredibly moving. Aside from a few reservations about the mezzo and the tenor soloists, there was an extraordinary concentration about the whole performance - I very much agree with Prommer's comments about Bychkov (who just gets better and better) and the fabulous Furlanetto. Poplavskaya was tremendously involving too.
Comment
-
-
Alf-Prufrock
In some of his early scores Verdi certainly wrote his lower brass part for a cimbasso, though I do not know if he did so in the Requiem. However, I have been a long-time advocate of the cimbasso. It has such a distinctive sound in the bass - well, a trombone-like sound at least. Tubby the tuba it ain't. Just listen to the clarity it gave the brass this evening. Impact, crispness, punch.
I suppose it should only be employed in Italian works of the nineteenth century (do others know of its use outside Italy?) But I would welcome it in large areas of repertoire.
Comment
-
David Underdown
Originally posted by Alf-Prufrock View PostHowever, I have been a long-time advocate of the cimbasso. It has such a distinctive sound in the bass - well, a trombone-like sound at least. Tubby the tuba it ain't. Just listen to the clarity it gave the brass this evening. Impact, crispness, punch.
Comment
Comment