Prom 8: Wednesday 20th July 2011 (Czech music)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mahlerei

    #16
    Chris

    Glad to hear it worked betetr in the hall. On iPlayer it sounded like it was coming from behind a thick curtain :(

    Comment

    • Ferretfancy
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 3487

      #17
      Chris Newman,

      Re-reading my message14, I seem to have slightly denigrated the BBC SO's playing, which was not my intention. They played with great commitment, and yes, the moments of partnership with Andrew Gaveron and Queyras in the Dvorak were superbly done. My reservations were more to do with the way the RAH acoustic affects what we hear, together with my feelings about Ma Vlast as a whole. Obviously there are still big variations in the way we all appreciate any work, so I'm glad that you enjoyed it so much. I should not allow my memories of Rostropovich playing at the Proms to affect my judgement, but they do creep in !

      Comment

      • Chris Newman
        Late Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 2100

        #18
        Hi Ferretfancy,
        Rostropovich and the DvorakConcerto .... I can only remember 21st August 1968 which was the only time I heard him play it live. Listening to that on the BBC Legends disc it sounds terrifyingly fast. Ironic that he and Queyras both played the same encore though Slava never got to the end as he rushed off in tears: the Bach Sarabande was his musical protest against the invasion.

        I love Má vlast as Vltava was the first piece of music I liked and the first LP I ever bought. The full works have grown on me. Previously I only ever heard them played live in Prague (at the State Opera as a very moving ballet, though the playing was not a patch on last night). I have lots of recordings: Davis, Kubelik, Mackerras, Norrington, Pesek, 2 x Talich, bits with Tausky. What amazes me about the work is that Smetana was a bear-faced magpie, stealing phrases and textures from everyone and everybody and yet, stone deaf and going mad, he stirs this mixture up with many brilliant bits of his own orchestration and creates something that sounds so fresh and uniquely Czech. As it progresses you hear Wagner's Ring, Tristan and Die Meistersinger...in fact in that terrifying Sarka just before the women murder all the men there is a long sinuous tune that starts off Wagnerian and Rhinegoldy and ends up sounding straight out of Verdi. In the woods and fields you get the opening of Schubert's Unfinished turned into utter bleakness. The finale of Tchaikovsky's First Symphony and the shepherds from Berlioz's Symphony Fantastique pop up near the end of Blanik and a right tub thumping set of fanfares to finish. Yet it all comes together, to me, as brilliantly as Elgar does (admittedly with his own tunes) in The Music Makers. Like salymap I think it all comes together as nicely as some rambling symphonies or Sibelius's Lemminkäinen Suite. The tragedy is that for the same reason as Beethoven and his late works he hardly heard a note of it played.

        I know what you mean about the Albert Hall accoustic. I usually stand near where the front of the fountain would have been. I never liked being on the rail as individual string players front stage can be heard whilst the sounds of the string sections centre stage and the woodwind are buried by them: further back these sections rise up and the string sections blend. Mind you, anywhere in the arena is better than some places in the seats where there are dead patches and there are still spots where the echo defeats the flying saucers. Why anyone puts up with the squeaky shoed wanderers in the gallery is beyond me. On the other hand accoustically I prefer the RAH arena to the Festival Hall, the appalling Barbican and Salisbury Cathedral which is my usual haunt. In my days of living in London I remember the annual accoustic shock of moving from the mellow Proms sound to the in-you-face sound of the Maida Vale studio.

        Do you think the orchestral sound has changed at the Proms since they have extended the stage so much? The brass and woodwind sound further away to me.

        Cheers
        Chris.

        Comment

        • salymap
          Late member
          • Nov 2010
          • 5969

          #19
          I'd love to see the RAH now but perhaps too full of ghosts for me. There were the two exits down the slope from the platform when I was last there. Did they move the dressing rooms etc? The 'bull run' must still be there and all the little rooms under and round the arena. The organ hadn't been updated then and emitted little squeaks and groans when the hall was empty. I love the place when it is empty, there can't be another hall so full of atmosphere. Nice to read your review Chris. regards, saly

          Comment

          • Jasmine Bassett
            Full Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 50

            #20
            I enjoyed the performance of Ma Vlast very much - despite the memories of Vltava as one of my "O" level set works.

            The only thing that spoiled it for me was the doubling up of the harps right at the beginning, maybe it wasn't helped that they were close miked for the R3 broadcast, but it just sounded as if the players were trying desparately to stay together in the flourishes and it just sounded too careful and controlled - after that all was wonderful.

            Comment

            • Prommer
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 1259

              #21
              I thought the Dvorak was a bit mushy from the orchestra, with the soloist so refined as to fade into the background too much - as the programme noted, a common reason given as to why cello concertos were not considered suitable or doable for a long time. Thus there was a heightened incompatibility here for me between the two. No surprise to me that Queyras is a chamber specialist,

              However, I agree with Chris re the Ma vlast. It was passionately played, the band clearly relishing the showpiece that it is. Kudos to the clarinettist, the trombones, and the lady on piccolo. Not sure about the timpanist! Still not the Czech Phil with Kubelik (a bit four square in some of the lyrical sections for that) but a very, very fine performance. I do think all the banging and booming in Tabor goes on a bit...

              Comment

              • pianoronald

                #22
                Originally posted by Mahlerei View Post
                Enjoyed the cello concerto, which I hardly know. Is Queyras' recording worth a punt?
                I have several recordings of the Dvorak concerto but Queyras' recording is definitely my favourite - what a great musician. Can't wait to hear him play the Bach suites on July 31st at Wigmore Hall.

                Comment

                • Chris Newman
                  Late Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 2100

                  #23
                  Today I listened to part of last night's Ma Vlast and have to say that it does not sound like the same performance as the one I heard in the hall. The current BBC sound spectrum is really one size fits all and when these recorded performances find their way onto BBCMM discs with no correction it makes for a tragic waste of opportunity.

                  Comment

                  • jayne lee wilson
                    Banned
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 10711

                    #24
                    In reply to comments about sound quality, I was listening to the "HD" 320kbps AAC stream, Macbook - optical digital out - Cambridge DacMagic, and I have to say the whole concert sounded splendid! Wide dynamic range (not quite as wide as some CDs or 24-bit downloads) warm, spacious, crisp and clear. The Smetana was indeed performed with great fire and passion, and well-balanced by conductor and engineers too. Compared to dynamically restricted FM (on a Magnum Dynalab tuner, for heavens' sake!) it was streets ahead. I did find it thrilling as well as moving. Overall I've been impressed with all the first week's Proms from the technical perspective described above. With iPlayer on demand, the bitrate is sadly restricted to. wait for it, 128kbps AAC. No wonder it doesn't sound so good. It used to be 192kbps which was OK, but the live "HD" (shame they called it that...) is very much better.

                    Jayne Lee Wilson
                    Liverpool uk (first post here since the BBC boards closed down...)

                    Comment

                    • Bryn
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 24688

                      #25
                      jlw, I have not seen any negative criticism regarding the audio quality of Prom 8, indeed, full marks to the engineers concerned. They took the risk of avoiding dynamic limitation and it paid off handsomely. The peak level of the HD Sound stream during the Smetana was -1.7dB below saturation level, with an average RMS level of -27.7dB, indicating a very healthy dynamic range indeed.

                      The criticisms posted here related specifically to Proms 1 and 4 which suffered very heavy dynamic compression indeed, as the 'fingerprints' posted here by johnb demonstrate.It should be noted that johnb employed the highly regarded Sound Forge to display the file, a rather more upmarket DAW than the bargain basement Goldwave. I got precisely the same results as johnb, and found very similar dynamic compression on the DAB broadcast.

                      Comment

                      • johnb
                        Full Member
                        • Mar 2007
                        • 2903

                        #26
                        jayne,

                        Welcome to the forum!
                        Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
                        In reply to comments about sound quality, I was listening to the "HD" 320kbps AAC stream, Macbook - optical digital out - Cambridge DacMagic, and I have to say the whole concert sounded splendid! Wide dynamic range (not quite as wide as some CDs or 24-bit downloads) warm, spacious, crisp and clear. The Smetana was indeed performed with great fire and passion, and well-balanced by conductor and engineers too. Compared to dynamically restricted FM (on a Magnum Dynalab tuner, for heavens' sake!) it was streets ahead. I did find it thrilling as well as moving.
                        I've also been listening to the HD stream on my audio system (fed by the digital outputs of either a Firewire external soundcard or my Squeezebox and (apart from Proms 1 and 4) I have no complaints at all about the sound quality or the dynamic range.

                        In fact, after reading some adverse comments about the dynamic range, etc I measured Stravinsky's Rite of Spring from Prom 6 and compared it with the Muti recording:

                        Prom 6 Rite (HD Sound):
                        Peaks: -1.3 dB
                        RSM: -30 dB (a measure of the average level)
                        Ambient hall during 'silence': -67 dB

                        Muti Rite:
                        Peaks: 0 dB
                        RSM: -20 dB
                        Ambient studio during 'silence': -59 dB

                        On the basis of that - the HD Sound Prom 6 actually has a wider dynamic range than the well regarded Muti recording!

                        I know there is a great deal more to the quality of a broadcast or recording than the raw dynamic range figures - but the comparison is quite interesting.

                        Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
                        With iPlayer on demand, the bitrate is sadly restricted to. wait for it, 128kbps AAC. No wonder it doesn't sound so good. It used to be 192kbps which was OK, but the live "HD" (shame they called it that...) is very much better.
                        Although Listen Again iPlayer is labelled as being 128kbps it is actually 192 kbps aac (honest)!

                        Comment

                        • bluestateprommer
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 3012

                          #27
                          From my vantage point just about in the middle of the BBC logo in the Arena, the Dvorak was OK, not the greatest rendition that I can imagine, but it was good enough. J-G.Q. did nicely with the Bach encore (Sarabande from Suite No. 2). JB did his best to stay out of the way of the soloist in the concerto, but then came fully into his own with Má vlast, where his conducting style became more extrovert, though as always with JB, never showing off. Except for a momentary brass flub in the finale, this would work just fine as a BBC Music Magazine CD. I was very happy finally to have heard the whole of Má vlast live, for once in my life (have heard the 1st 3 live before, but never the others).

                          Comment

                          • jayne lee wilson
                            Banned
                            • Jul 2011
                            • 10711

                            #28
                            johnb - thanks for those figures! I didn't think, overall, that the Rite was quite as savagely splendid as M. Cowan said - enjoyable nonetheless...

                            My comments about the first week were mainly about the concerts since Monday, but...

                            With the Gothic Symphony, yes I did notice the limiting (especially compared to the often shocking impact of the Naxos recording!) but I felt inclined to forgive the engineers given the huge, live forces involved; and also because I did feel the clarity, both texturally and in the spatial layering in the hall, was well achieved (Well done Hugh Thomas!). I liked the more forward immediacy of the orchestra, with the chorus soaring over the top, though the soloists were a little too forward; pushed the volume higher than usual, and ended up genuinely moved by it as it drew to a close, with a surprisingly concise final gesture.

                            Comment

                            • salymap
                              Late member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 5969

                              #29
                              I've just heard Wednesday's Prom with the Dvorak cello concerto and Smetana's Ma Vlast and thought it very good.

                              It's the first time I've heard the latter [almost] live and realised what an exhausting work it must be for the orchestra. Well done JB and the BBCSO. Also the excellent cellist of course.

                              Comment

                              • barber olly

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Jasmine Bassett View Post
                                I enjoyed the performance of Ma Vlast very much - despite the memories of Vltava as one of my "O" level set works.

                                The only thing that spoiled it for me was the doubling up of the harps right at the beginning, maybe it wasn't helped that they were close miked for the R3 broadcast, but it just sounded as if the players were trying desparately to stay together in the flourishes and it just sounded too careful and controlled - after that all was wonderful.
                                Jasmine,
                                You may know more about harps than I do, but the sound the engineers brought out, for me, sounded great. I notice that they also favoured them in Janacek's Sinfnietta last night. Too often harpists lose out to the louder sounds of other instruments, good to see them treated with respect!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X