If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Today's the day... What do we think of Proms season 2011?
J I do wonder whether RW is accurate in calling Tim Minchin a 'musical genius' (I've never heard him, or heard of him ).
Actually Tim Minchin is very good indeed , much more entertaining IMV than the usual sub-Coward nonsense that passes as "musical humour"
try this one ?
Actually Tim Minchin is very good indeed , much more entertaining IMV than the usual sub-Coward nonsense that passes as "musical humour"
try this one ?
Actually Tim Minchin is very good indeed , much more entertaining IMV than the usual sub-Coward nonsense that passes as "musical humour"
try this one ?
My problem with comedy is that find myself analysing it rather than laughing at it
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Plenty of enticements from the visiting orchestras, but who on earth is responsible for approving the rag-bag of a programme announced for Zubin Mehta and the Israel Philharmonic? The announced works total only 66 minutes. Gil Shaham in the Bruch is the attraction, but to bring so good an orchestra so far for such short measure beggars belief.
RW seldom wants to talk about the effects of budget cuts, and even less often admits that any decision is the result of cuts.
But this time, there's literally nothing to say--this year's concerts were planned, scheduled and accounted for well before last year; next year's programs are mostly in the bag now. If no cuts have been announced and the planning cycle is so long, how in the world does the interviewer expect him to have anything meaningful to say about it? And what right does he have to slyly insinuate Wright is lying? Ignorant AND rude: win-win!
I agree with ML about a 'marketing strategy' with the latest comedy Prom. No strategy? Not connected with the Comic Classics on Breakfast? Or the Red Nose Day programming? Or the Christmas so-called 'comedy quiz"? Really?
If the interviewer hadn't been so hell-bent on nipping away at him like a badger cornering a snake, perhaps Wright would have come back with his usual "something for everybody" line-- but saying "you shouldn't read conspiracy and strategies into every single editorial decision that's taken"? Well, he was annoyed-- and rightly so. If he'd really lost it, he might have said "**** off and don't second-guess my editorial judgment when you don't know what the **** you're talking about". See? It could have been worse.
The frequent Roger Wright-bashing comments can be tiresome, and are hardly likely to win friends and influence people. I suspect the ending Radio 3 Messageboards was not unrelated to the constant tirade. Surely it's possible to comment on the policies without making it personal.
I presume RW wanted the R3 controller post, if you put yourself in that position then you make yourself a target if things go wrong or people don't like your ideas, its a fact of life I'm afraid. Someone after all has to take responsibility for the current state of R3 if it isn't the controller then we should know who's really pulling the strings.
That may be but at least I'm not a sad, little man living his last few remaining years as a parasite off the state, in a godforsaken part of north London; consumed with bitterness and hatred towards those who've made a success of their lives.
I take it they didn't like your string quartet then ?
That may be but at least I'm not a sad and lonely little man living his last few remaining years as a parasite off the state, in a godforsaken part of north London; consumed with bitterness and hatred towards those who've made a success of their lives.
That may be but at least I'm not a sad and lonely little man living his last few remaining years as a parasite off the state, in a godforsaken part of north London; consumed with bitterness and hatred towards those who've made a success of their lives.
I'm afrId, Alpenmate and others, suffolk's got a very fair point.
The guy wanted the job. It is unarguably the highest profile job in UK / BBC classical music. If he makes editorial decisions that set out / affect the highest profile classical music event in the calendar, they must and will be debated - but RW so often takes 'debated' to mean an attack, or 'second guessing' or sniping, or seeking to undermine. He has real form on this. Among notable other BBC editors / managers, there is the same aggressive / defensive mindset.
IMO, Front Row were perfectly within their rights to ask such questions on costs / cuts / programming. They have asked the same questions of almost every Arts administrator they have had on the prog for months. RW should not be an exception. He could prefectly well have explained to a - please note - Radio 4 audience how the Proms is set up. We on R3 may know the nuts and bolts, but maybe a number of R4 listeners don't. A patient, equable RW answer could have headed off a lot at the pass. But no..........the result being that the interview got tetchier and nastier and almost less informative as it went on, driving RW into exaggerations.
ML has been round the block a few times, and he could spot an interviewee rattled and/or defending what some might have raised eyebrows over and - shock horror - may even find indefensible, namely the apparently no-coincidence blatant cashing-in 'comic' agenda.
That's all part of what happens when Arts radio is doing its job.
And I am not sure likening RW to a snake being cornered by a badger is entirely flattering or much of a defence of the man, but let that pass!
Comment