Does anyone here have experience of Apple TV, Airplay and linking to iPads?
Is it really the case that an Apple TV connected to an HD TV can stream decent video from an iPad? I have a generation 1 iPad, though I have the latest software installed.
If so, can it also do the photo displays faster than my Freesat box or Blu-Ray, both of which seem challenged with displaying photo albums. I'd probably also want to use it for iPlayer, 4oD etc.
I do have a Roku LT unit connected to another TV, and I may be able to get it working with Plex and the iPad, but that would require using yet another computer as a server - not impossible, but time consuming, and I'd need to be fairly confident that it would work It could be worth the current £93 from Amazon [or even less - http://www.amazon.co.uk/New-Apple-TV...2407386&sr=1-1 - is this the same/latest model? The price keeps changing I'm sure it was £93 this morning ...now sems to be £84.99] for the Apple unit if it saved a few hours of installation pain and head scratching.
Can I assume that I don't need a server with the Apple TV, or is that wishful thinking? I did find an application called Twonky Beam, but that seems to be rather finicky and difficult to handle. I could afford an Apple TV, but arguably I don't need yet another device. It's not worth it if it doesn't deliver something significantly better than I have now. On a previous occasion I had a WD TV and sent it back because it didn't show the videos from our cameras without glitches, and the workaround which I found was too time consuming. For photos I want to simply insert a camera card into a reader, get the photos to a computer or iPad, and then show them from there. Using a video tool such as Handbrake sometimes improves video** if the cpu on the host computer isn't fast enough, but I really don't want to have to do any extra processing if I can avoid it.
I can watch iPlayer on our HDTV from Freesat, but it's rather clunky navigating to the pages. It is undoubtedly easier to download (where possible) content to the iPad from iPlayer, and then play it there, but it would be good to watch on the bigger screen. I also suspect that the video quality might be better - though I'm not sure - for downloaded content rather than streamed content.
** By doing a very modest compression on HD video using Handbrake it is possible to reduce some video files to around 25% of their original size. The image loss per frame is barely perceptible, but it improves the overall experience enormously as the video may then run without stuttering, and one can run on Intel Core Duo machines, rather than i7s with a high clock rate and an advanced video graphics card. It perhaps makes the video more portable across machines too, as I have noticed differences in the severity of such stuttering in different operating systems with the same hardware.
Is it really the case that an Apple TV connected to an HD TV can stream decent video from an iPad? I have a generation 1 iPad, though I have the latest software installed.
If so, can it also do the photo displays faster than my Freesat box or Blu-Ray, both of which seem challenged with displaying photo albums. I'd probably also want to use it for iPlayer, 4oD etc.
I do have a Roku LT unit connected to another TV, and I may be able to get it working with Plex and the iPad, but that would require using yet another computer as a server - not impossible, but time consuming, and I'd need to be fairly confident that it would work It could be worth the current £93 from Amazon [or even less - http://www.amazon.co.uk/New-Apple-TV...2407386&sr=1-1 - is this the same/latest model? The price keeps changing I'm sure it was £93 this morning ...now sems to be £84.99] for the Apple unit if it saved a few hours of installation pain and head scratching.
Can I assume that I don't need a server with the Apple TV, or is that wishful thinking? I did find an application called Twonky Beam, but that seems to be rather finicky and difficult to handle. I could afford an Apple TV, but arguably I don't need yet another device. It's not worth it if it doesn't deliver something significantly better than I have now. On a previous occasion I had a WD TV and sent it back because it didn't show the videos from our cameras without glitches, and the workaround which I found was too time consuming. For photos I want to simply insert a camera card into a reader, get the photos to a computer or iPad, and then show them from there. Using a video tool such as Handbrake sometimes improves video** if the cpu on the host computer isn't fast enough, but I really don't want to have to do any extra processing if I can avoid it.
I can watch iPlayer on our HDTV from Freesat, but it's rather clunky navigating to the pages. It is undoubtedly easier to download (where possible) content to the iPad from iPlayer, and then play it there, but it would be good to watch on the bigger screen. I also suspect that the video quality might be better - though I'm not sure - for downloaded content rather than streamed content.
** By doing a very modest compression on HD video using Handbrake it is possible to reduce some video files to around 25% of their original size. The image loss per frame is barely perceptible, but it improves the overall experience enormously as the video may then run without stuttering, and one can run on Intel Core Duo machines, rather than i7s with a high clock rate and an advanced video graphics card. It perhaps makes the video more portable across machines too, as I have noticed differences in the severity of such stuttering in different operating systems with the same hardware.
Comment