The best items of tech you have ever owned

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrGongGong
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 18357

    #76
    Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
    Yeah.... I think you can file "losing the remote control" under "human error..."
    And without humanity, you'd never have the Quad 67 design in the first place, so....

    But it has a Philips transport, right? So it should work with Marantz/Philips remotes. And with such designs you can press "eject" on the fascia (in the 67, the drawer open/close flap at immediate right of the drawer), load the disc, then a gentle push on the CD drawer will result in playback. "Eject" again to stop....
    That's a "fail" in my book then
    the number of times I have turned up to places where there is similar equipment that I can't use because there is either no remote or flat batteries is far too many, and I do have a couple of CD players I used to use for sound installations that are similar, the only advantage being that the same remote would operate both simultaneously.

    (I don't get the watch thing either)

    Comment

    • Richard Barrett
      Guest
      • Jan 2016
      • 6259

      #77
      Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
      That's a "fail" in my book then
      Quite. I've never fathomed why it is that domestic stereo systems are provided with remote controls at all, let alone remote controls that are required to operate the thing. Not just because of losing them or batteries running out, they make the place look untidy and they're a solution to a problem that never existed - what's so wrong with getting up and turning a good old-fashioned knob now and again?

      Comment

      • jayne lee wilson
        Banned
        • Jul 2011
        • 10711

        #78
        Don't get the watch thing...?
        ​Archetypal, Orbital..... we go back a VERY long way with them you know...



        ***

        Remote Controls, RB?
        As a serial volume-adjuster, fussy about the right level for a given recording, I'd be appalled to live without one.
        It may depend on system sensitivity - mine gets pretty loud by 10 o'clock, so small adjustments make a big difference, or even switching attenuation in sometimes. And starting playback at the hifi rack inevitably means the music starting before you're back in your chair (not good for a Beethoven 5, a Brahms 3 or a Nielsen 4).... just like the good old days of placing the stylus on the record...

        With TV it's even more important: muting and 30x ff when the ads are on, or reducing levels when those Star Wars battles get a bit too noisy... not to mention rewinding to the goal you missed when you were feeding the cat....
        Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 08-05-18, 09:00.

        Comment

        • cloughie
          Full Member
          • Dec 2011
          • 22225

          #79
          Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
          Don't get the watch thing...?
          ​Archetypal, Orbital..... we go back a VERY long way with them you know...

          Watches are handier on dull days!

          Comment

          • gurnemanz
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 7432

            #80
            Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
            Quite. I've never fathomed why it is that domestic stereo systems are provided with remote controls at all, let alone remote controls that are required to operate the thing. Not just because of losing them or batteries running out, they make the place look untidy and they're a solution to a problem that never existed - what's so wrong with getting up and turning a good old-fashioned knob now and again?
            I have recently upgraded my amp and now have one (Marantz) with a remote control for the first time. I will confess that I have come to find it extremely convenient for quickly switching input and adjusting volume, especially since I also put TV sound through it. Riding my bike, playing tennis and doing the garden gives me enough physical exercise.

            Comment

            • french frank
              Administrator/Moderator
              • Feb 2007
              • 30610

              #81
              Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
              (I don't get the watch thing either)
              Speed, just a quick glance. Strapped to wrist, so unlike remotes &c. doesn't get lost

              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

              Comment

              • greenilex
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 1626

                #82
                The annoying thing about my trusty old Pulsar is the date adjustment...takes hours of hit-and-miss to change the digit on non-standard months.

                Comment

                • vinteuil
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 13030

                  #83
                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  Speed, just a quick glance. Strapped to wrist, so unlike remotes &c. doesn't get lost

                  ... and also - with a clock face, you immediately see the time elapsed / to go - unlike digitals where you have to do a mental calculation.

                  And, as I seppaphor, if you get an automatic - no further cost involved...




                  .

                  Comment

                  • Richard Barrett
                    Guest
                    • Jan 2016
                    • 6259

                    #84
                    Clearly we all have our preferences, but -
                    Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                    ... and also - with a clock face, you immediately see the time elapsed / to go - unlike digitals where you have to do a mental calculation.
                    - I really don't understand this at all. I wouldn't say there's any less "calculation" involved in looking at a clock face than at a digital display: it's just a question of what's more familiar and/or more comfortable for each individual, surely.

                    Speaking as someone almost all of whose work (and not just work) is connected in some way with technology, I really don't find myself getting attached to any of its physical appurtenances. Normally I use something until I'm forced for one reason or another to replace it. (Apart from my last watch!)

                    Comment

                    • vinteuil
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 13030

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
                      Clearly we all have our preferences, but -
                      - I really don't understand this at all. I wouldn't say there's any less "calculation" involved in looking at a clock face than at a digital display: it's just a question of what's more familiar and/or more comfortable for each individual, surely.
                      ... interesting. For me, if my phone tells me it's 13:37 I have to have a bit of thought before I apprehend that it's twenty three minutes before whatever I have to do at two o' clock. Whereas if I look at a clock face, it is somehow an immediate apperception.

                      I don't mind digital time-pieces, it's just that yer analogue clock seems to have a more immediate connection with the ( = my ) brain...


                      .

                      Comment

                      • Dave2002
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 18057

                        #86
                        Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                        And, as I seppaphor, if you get an automatic - no further cost involved...


                        I note that today is Unusual Words Day - but this one is beyond me!

                        Comment

                        • vinteuil
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 13030

                          #87
                          .

                          ... I think I stole it from Afferbeck Lauder.




                          .

                          Comment

                          • Bergonzi
                            Banned
                            • Feb 2018
                            • 122

                            #88
                            I love my analogue watch which is also charged by light and never needs a new battery. Much preferred to a digital one.

                            Comment

                            • jayne lee wilson
                              Banned
                              • Jul 2011
                              • 10711

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Bergonzi View Post
                              I love my analogue watch which is also charged by light and never needs a new battery. Much preferred to a digital one.
                              "Charged by Light.."

                              A Human Sapiens stood before the sun and saw her shadow cast;
                              The hands of the watch are the Human shadow upon the Earth.
                              Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 12-05-18, 07:47.

                              Comment

                              • vinteuil
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 13030

                                #90
                                Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
                                "Charged by Light.."

                                A Human Sapiens stood before the sun and saw her shadow cast; and considered....
                                The hands of the watch are the Human shadow upon the Earth.
                                ... if she stood before the sun, the shadow cast would be behind her.



                                .

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X