"Most BBC radio stations to become unavailable for international users"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ein Heldenleben
    Full Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 7331

    #61
    Originally posted by Roger Webb View Post
    That seems very plausible - shame it’s an uncredited piece.

    Comment

    • Roger Webb
      Full Member
      • Feb 2024
      • 1204

      #62
      Originally posted by Forget It (U2079353) View Post
      The Proms are already syndicated overseas. They get paid for.
      The RAI Radio 3 in Italy often relays the Proms live - with their own interval talks.
      I guess they are similarly heard and paid for in the US.
      Er, you quoted from the blog, they are not my words....I don't agree with what it says, I merely posted it as of interest in the context of the ongoing conversation.

      Comment

      • Ein Heldenleben
        Full Member
        • Apr 2014
        • 7331

        #63
        Originally posted by Roger Webb View Post

        Yes, all of that I agree with.

        But the BBC and interested parties, performing rights-wise have to realise with digital communication - the possibilities of which are ever increasing - that it's not going to be possible to police them as they would wish to do. Actually, it has always been thus....but to a lesser degree - for example I had friends who lived in Normandy in the 80s who were classical music fans and listened to BBC Radio 3 on FM with a massive 6 element Yagi array mounted on their roof - they didn't pay a license fee. It has merely become easier to listen to stations from all parts of the globe with the advent of internet radio... 'resistance is useless'!

        I followed the TuneIn case and I, like a lot of people were amazed that they didn't appeal against the ruling...it seems quite surprising that Warners et al didn't see fit to sue other aggregators similarly, and that, whilst the lawyers did ok, Warners et al (and those musicians they represent) were not one penny better off for forcing listeners to move the dial, so to speak, to another aggregator, but it did annoy us who had to junk our streamers! How many 'smart speakers' went to the tip in the BBCs attempt to force Sounds app. use on listeners by their 'Shoutcast' decision?!

        I love(d) BBC Radio 3 (when in the early 70s I was sent to work in a Communication Centre in the Middle East I used to get an Oppo in London to send the Proms on one of the 'spare' network channels usually used for engineering chit-chat so I could listen on the night watch!), but I'm afraid I'm drifting away (from the BBC, that is!).....making a series of incoherent statements, retracted almost immediately after being discussed on a BBC news programme doesn't fill me with confidence in the management structure.
        Suing Tunein was all they had to do. With that precedent their cease and desist letters gather much more force. Suing really is the final option.

        Comment

        • Roger Webb
          Full Member
          • Feb 2024
          • 1204

          #64
          Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post

          That seems very plausible - shame it’s an uncredited piece.
          These blogs are put out by industry insider Jon Jacobs who has done work as a copywriter and social media manager for Wigmore Hall, English Concert, Warner Classics, Ulster Orch. etc.

          I stuck it up there, not because I agree with its precepts, but because it's an interesting point of view.

          Comment

          • Roger Webb
            Full Member
            • Feb 2024
            • 1204

            #65
            Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post

            Suing Tunein was all they had to do. With that precedent their cease and desist letters gather much more force. Suing really is the final option.
            Well those letters have fallen on deaf ears (?) - not a single aggregator has 'ceased' or 'desisted' putting out content 'belonging' to Warners from every radio station on the globe.....except TuneIn - and that only in the UK! TuneIn is still available in every country it streams to, and those radio stations it streams to are pumping out Warners stuff dawn til dusk! I suspect there are other reasons that Warners (and I thought Sony was involved) have picked this particular fight. Try downloading any aggregator from the app. store, you'll find they carry every imaginable radio station in the world.....apart from BBC, of course!

            Comment

            • Ein Heldenleben
              Full Member
              • Apr 2014
              • 7331

              #66
              Originally posted by Roger Webb View Post

              Well those letters have fallen on deaf ears (?) - not a single aggregator has 'ceased' or 'desisted' putting out content 'belonging' to Warners from every radio station on the globe.....except TuneIn - and that only in the UK! TuneIn is still available in every country it streams to, and those radio stations it streams to are pumping out Warners stuff dawn til dusk! I suspect there are other reasons that Warners (and I thought Sony was involved) have picked this particular fight. Try downloading any aggregator from the app. store, you'll find they carry every imaginable radio station in the world.....apart from BBC, of course!
              That’s interesting . Warners , like Disney , are very hot on copyright. Wonder if they’ve cut a deal or just don’t think it’s worth the effort for the revenue (compared to the Spotifys and Amazon musics) ? Thing is for the composers and performers it is worth the effort. It’s a miserable time to be a minorish to middling creative artist - especially if like classical musicians there are zero merchandising opportunities at concerts,

              Comment

              • teamsaint
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 25324

                #67
                Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post

                That’s interesting . Warners , like Disney , are very hot on copyright. Wonder if they’ve cut a deal or just don’t think it’s worth the effort for the revenue (compared to the Spotifys and Amazon musics) ? Thing is for the composers and performers it is worth the effort. It’s a miserable time to be a minorish to middling creative artist - especially if like classical musicians there are zero merchandising opportunities at concerts,
                One might ask whether Classical musicians and their agents tend to miss merchandising opportunities.Musicians in other genres often find a way to make useful extra cash and help build the audience.
                the big names in classical ( soloists and star conductors ) probably don’t need the money or extra effort, I guess. But chamber musicians , for example with a record deal may be missing a trick?

                I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                I am not a number, I am a free man.

                Comment

                • Ein Heldenleben
                  Full Member
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 7331

                  #68
                  Originally posted by teamsaint View Post

                  One might ask whether Classical musicians and their agents tend to miss merchandising opportunities.Musicians in other genres often find a way to make useful extra cash and help build the audience.
                  the big names in classical ( soloists and star conductors ) probably don’t need the money or extra effort, I guess. But chamber musicians , for example with a record deal may be missing a trick?
                  Trouble is the somewhat older audience at the LPO’s excellent RFH concerts are unlikely to buy Megadeth style “Rust In Peace “ TShirts at £20.00 a pop.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X