Accents, umlauts etc.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Resurrection Man

    #16
    I'm guessing this is for a PC?

    I use TextExpander on the Mac...useful for entering your email address at a stroke although the software is a tad expensive if, like me, you only use it for one or two entries.

    Comment

    • Karafan
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 786

      #17
      I find this easier to use for German special characters, which I use the most...
      "Let me have my own way in exactly everything, and a sunnier and more pleasant creature does not exist." Thomas Carlyle

      Comment

      • Don Petter

        #18
        Originally posted by Hornspieler
        ... a mish mash of colour saturation ranging from normal to too bright to black and white - with occasional flashes
        Sounds like more than just a missing accent?

        Comment

        • Simon

          #19
          Originally posted by Petrushka View Post

          I feel so lazy and ignorant when I see Dvorak, Lutoslawski, Karl Bohm and Furtwangler amongst many others written on here correctly.
          I don't! I just see accents as a waste of time and effort on this MB. We all know who is referred to by the various names, so IMO it hardly matters.

          Of course, in a professional or personal correspondence situation I'd suggest that it does matter, and I'd try to write correctly in whatever language I was using.

          Comment

          • Resurrection Man

            #20
            Originally posted by Simon View Post
            I don't! I just see accents as a waste of time and effort on this MB. We all know who is referred to by the various names, so IMO it hardly matters.

            Of course, in a professional or personal correspondence situation I'd suggest that it does matter, and I'd try to write correctly in whatever language I was using.
            But where does it stop, Simon? Standards, old chap, standards. Youll be dropping your apostrophes next. Or vn wrs drppng ll th vwls.

            Comment

            • Simon

              #21
              Originally posted by Resurrection Man View Post
              But where does it stop, Simon? Standards, old chap, standards. Youll be dropping your apostrophes next. Or vn wrs drppng ll th vwls.
              Lol. Never the apostrophes, RM. Nvr tht. Y mght mstk m fr gnggng.

              Comment

              • Resurrection Man

                #22
                Originally posted by Simon View Post
                Lol. Never the apostrophes, RM. Nvr tht. Y mght mstk m fr gnggng.
                Hvn frbd

                Comment

                • amateur51

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Simon View Post
                  Lol. Never the apostrophes, RM. Nvr tht. Y mght mstk m fr gnggng.
                  It's been sweetness and light here since 17 December but now a certain party has returned, the unnecessary sly digs have started

                  Good to have the evidence tho'

                  Comment

                  • Resurrection Man

                    #24
                    Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                    It's been sweetness and light here since 17 December but now a certain party has returned, the unnecessary sly digs have started

                    Good to have the evidence tho'

                    Mmmm... the phrase 'pot' 'kettle' and 'black' springs to mind, my friend

                    Comment

                    • Simon

                      #25
                      Oh,there have been several humorous digs since then. As was the one above, as GG's idiosyncratic use of the apostrophe is well-known.

                      However, after I'd posted, several of us anticipated that you'd take the opportunity to try to stir. As you say, good to have the evidence!

                      That aside, wasn't the 16th the day your your friend had an extremely crude and objectionable post removed?

                      Comment

                      • amateur51

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Simon View Post
                        Oh,there have been several humorous digs since then. As was the one above, as GG's idiosyncratic use of the apostrophe is well-known.

                        However, after I'd posted, several of us anticipated that you'd take the opportunity to try to stir. As you say, good to have the evidence!

                        That aside, wasn't the 16th the day your your friend had an extremely crude and objectionable post removed?

                        Comment

                        • amateur51

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Resurrection Man View Post
                          Mmmm... the phrase 'pot' 'kettle' and 'black' springs to mind, my friend
                          Any relevant evidence to support this, RM? As I said, it's been delightfully quiet and hassle-free round here until recent contributions, of which there is now ample evidence

                          Comment

                          • Simon

                            #28
                            Ample evidence indeed.

                            Keep interfering and stirring as long as you like, amateur - but you'll fail in the end!

                            Comment

                            • Simon

                              #29
                              Back to the subject after that unfortunate little episode of attempted trouble-causing, which in hindsight would have been far better ignored...

                              I remember several arguments in the past, mostly whilst a student, about the use of accents. Where they indicate stress, as for example in Spanish, or pronunciation, as with the acute in French, then clearly there's a point. But where they are merely leftovers form past usage or indicators of a long ago change - as I gather is the case with the French circumflex, for example - then one wonders why the bother. (If I'm wrong about the circumflex, no doubt somone will pop in to clarify).

                              As regards missing vowels, years ago there was a quite humorous text on here of a purported directive from some EU outfit, trying to improve spelling. I'll see if I can find it...***

                              Interestingly, it's almost always possible to grasp meaning immediately from English texts without vowels. There have been several interesting studies on it.


                              [][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]


                              *** And here it is: http://www.spellingsociety.org/news/media/spoofs.php

                              Comment

                              • amateur51

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Simon View Post
                                Back to the subject after that unfortunate little episode of attempted trouble-causing, which in hindsight would have been far better ignored...

                                I remember several arguments in the past, mostly whilst a student, about the use of accents. Where they indicate stress, as for example in Spanish, or pronunciation, as with the acute in French, then clearly there's a point. But where they are merely leftovers form past usage or indicators of a long ago change - as I gather is the case with the French circumflex, for example - then one wonders why the bother. (If I'm wrong about the circumflex, no doubt somone will pop in to clarify).

                                As regards missing vowels, years ago there was a quite humorous text on here of a purported directive from some EU outfit, trying to improve spelling. I'll see if I can find it...***

                                Interestingly, it's almost always possible to grasp meaning immediately from English texts without vowels. There have been several interesting studies on it.


                                [][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]


                                *** And here it is: http://www.spellingsociety.org/news/media/spoofs.php
                                George Perec's 300-page novel La disparition (1969) is a lipogram, written without ever using the letter "e". It has been translated into English by Gilbert Adair under the title A Void (1994), wiki tells us

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X