Originally posted by french frank
View Post
New Posts - number of posts displayed
Collapse
X
-
Don Petter
-
Originally posted by johnb View PostCould you, please, check whether such a modifiable setting exists? (That is, if you feel the timeout is too short.)
Don, yes, I mean leaving/closing all the forum windows which are open.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
FF,
As far as I can tell, in vBulletin, there is a "Time out for Cookies" Setting.
This is the time in seconds that a user must remain inactive before any unread posts are marked read. This setting also controls how long a user will remain on Who's Online after their last activity.
It might be under "vBulletin Options" in the Admin Control Panel.
The vBulletin website has the navigation as:
Settings > Options > Cookies and HTTP Header Options
If you can navigate to that setting in the Admin Control Panel you can decide what would be a reasonable "Time out for Cookies" setting. (1 hr = 3600, 2 hrs = 7200, etc, etc, etc)
Comment
-
-
FF,
Apologies, I didn't see your post before writing my post.
Is this the setting that you have amended?
Regarding your discussion with Don, can I repeat that the timeout seems to happen without navigating away or closing any windows - in my test it happened when I was inactive, i.e. not interacting with the forum.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Postr3ok (and similar) list the latest 10/20 (whatever number is chosen) posts, so if you look once a day you'll probably see a different selection each time. I'm not sure how you find earlier posts that you've missed.
Comment
-
-
Right, back from the basement and I can report, definitively ('appen).
We have enabled, apparently, certain inactivity-based settings which involve timeouts. There are other options but these are 'more space and processor intensive'. We do have monthly limits for the website and we currently have a fairish margin of comfort in spite of the abrupt upsurge in usage. But at the moment we don't have much idea how the forum will develop (or not). For this reason I think we'll stick to the timeouts.
Later on we may need to increase bandwidth - perfectly possible. But not for the moment. Make sense?
[Thanks, DB I wonder if you have to be logged in to do that?]It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Don Petter
Comment