Originally posted by french frank
View Post
Hello
Collapse
X
-
2cats
-
Originally posted by 2cats View PostI'm sure he is a nice person, and in many respects as you say it's a producer/controller issue rather than presenter. But Sara Mohr-Pietsch also presents Breakfast and has done for many years. She does not sound patronising, narcissistic or smug in any possible way - just a friendly voice when I need it most, that being on a cold dark rainy morning when I have to leave the confines of a warm bed and emerge into the wild blue yonder. Sara makes the best of what Mr.Producer gives her to do - something that seems to struggle to make itself manifest in the nature of 'The Roc'.
You are very, very welcome 2cats!
Comment
-
-
2cats
Originally posted by antongould View PostOMG - the second member of the SMP fan club - does this mean we can have a Christmas Party?
You are very, very welcome 2cats!
I've also had an Email of mine read out by Ms. Mohr-Pietsch one morning during Piano Season where I basically outlined my reasons why I gave up trying to learn the piano after seven years and my bad experiences with piano teachers and exams as an adult. It seems I provoked quite a debate.....Last edited by Guest; 19-11-12, 11:28.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 2cats View Postjust a friendly voice when I need it most
When it gets to the stage that people are tuning in to hear the friendly voice or attractive personality, we're all on to a loser. You'll get the people who most people like and if you don't like them - tough!
I personally don't think it makes sense for a low audience station like Radio 3 to push their presenters. The danger comes because people will make a point of NOT listening when they see the name of the presenter. It doesn't make sense if people who enjoy classical music avoid classical music programmes because they find the presenter irritating.
The quid pro quo is: SMP v. Petroc. [Or both or neither, depending.]It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
2cats
Originally posted by french frank View PostI think that's the key - in probably a rather different way to how you mean it. It's why 'presenters' and 'talent' are so important to broadcasters and on the mass audience stations are paid such exorbitant salaries: they pull in listeners.
When it gets to the stage that people are tuning in to hear the friendly voice or attractive personality, we're all on to a loser. You'll get the people who most people like and if you don't like them - tough!
I personally don't think it makes sense for a low audience station like Radio 3 to push their presenters. The danger comes because people will make a point of NOT listening when they see the name of the presenter. It doesn't make sense if people who enjoy classical music avoid classical music programmes because they find the presenter irritating.
The quid pro quo is: SMP v. Petroc. [Or both or neither, depending.]
If anyone remembers Radio Caroline's mostly anonymous DJ's on the M.V Ross Revenge in the 1980s, one would appreciate the quality of the music over the presenter playing it. Or, (just to show I'm not totally anti-Radio 2), John Dunn or Paul Hollingdale on 'Breakfast Special'?
Comment
-
Paul Sherratt
-
Originally posted by 2cats View PostI've also had an Email of mine read out by Ms. Mohr-Pietsch one morning during Piano Season where I basically outlined my reasons why I gave up trying to learn the piano after seven years and my bad experiences with piano teachers and exams as an adult. It seems I provoked quite a debate.....
For others, that's a literal turn-off: over to Radio 4 or no radio at all.
Again, when a small audience of listeners shares one common interest, why divide them by introducing other elements which render the programme less attractive to half of them? We know it's the gamble that it will attract more listeners than it alienates = net gain. But there's been no clear evidence that it works.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostFor others, that's a literal turn-off: over to Radio 4 or no radio at all."...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View Post... or Radio KUSC Southern California Classical... :
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 2cats View PostNot being one for slick, well thought-out user names, I looked up and saw my two cats, Sharon and Tracey.
I feel slightly ashamed I have mentioned Mr.Trelawny's spiritual home at 100-102 FM in my first time posting. The capitalist entity shall nee pass my keyboard again. Is John Sachet supposed to be good or something???
Welcome btw,not a neglected British music fan by any chance are you?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View Post... or Radio KUSC Southern California Classical... or many others... This is the 21st century, frenchie!!
But however many radio stations there are, there is no absolute necessity to listen to any of them ...It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
2cats
Originally posted by EdgeleyRob View PostWelcome btw,not a neglected British music fan by any chance are you?
Comment
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... curiously, KUSC Southern California Classical doesn't seem to be available on the half dozen little FM radios scattered over the house through which ( for Caliban : thru which ) I mainly listen. Perhaps they order these things differently in London W2...
Comment
-
Comment