Originally posted by eighthobstruction
View Post
Politics & Current Affairs board
Collapse
X
-
It is displayed on the Forum Frontpage....in the Left hand Margin (under OTHER LINKS)....or Bookmark to toolbar....http://www.for3.org/forums/forum.phpbong ching
Comment
-
-
scottycelt
Originally posted by eighthobstruction View PostStrange that posters are not visiting the P & CA board....is there any reason for that??....http://www.for3.org/forums/forumdisp...urrent-Affairs
Comment
-
Originally posted by scottycelt View PostWould never want to be associated with that lot, 8O ...It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
Chris Heaton-Harris MP at the PAC grilling of Patten and Co yesterday likened it to a bizarre game of Whack-a-Mole. This must seem a bit like that to you ff - you whack a couple of threads and this one looks set to run and run. No chance this could also be moved to P&CA I don't suppose?
Comment
-
Richard Tarleton
Sorry - we are already - I was confused. It is still at the top of "What's New", except on Scotty's computer obviously :-)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostNo chance this could also be moved to P&CA I don't suppose?
1) This isn't just a matter of 'People don't have to read the threads if they find them irritating': that's irrelevant. The discussions are read by guests and give a particular impression of the forum. A Facebook message came through last week saying: "I looked at your sister site [sic] and it was all about politics."
2) JLW has made (I think) one contribution to this thread:
"A[s] the one who began those two threads which caused so much upset, no-one could have been more put off than I was by their degeneration into repetitive titfortat insults, which is why I stopped contributing to them."
That just about sums up my view.
3) The problem is not with the topics: it's with the posters.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post2) JLW has made (I think) one contribution to this thread:
"A[s] the one who began those two threads which caused so much upset, no-one could have been more put off than I was by their degeneration into repetitive titfortat insults, which is why I stopped contributing to them."
That just about sums up my view.
3) The problem is not with the topics: it's with the posters.
The second post on JLW's second thread was this - now hived off so that it can't be seen in its original context:
Originally posted by Mr Pee View PostOh give it a rest for God's sake. Why start yet another thread on this?
You could have just made this a new post on the other homophobia thread, but no, you had to launch a new one.
I pointed out recently that a long subthread had developed on the topic of gay marriage - and it was not started by anyone in favour.
Comment
-
-
to get to "Platform 3", you have to scroll past eight specifically Classical music threads, half of the board total number of threads.
one thing about political/social issues is that they can be quite fast moving, if they are in the news, and thus generate a lot of posts quickly, whereas discussion about music often takes place in a more leisurely fashion.
It would be interesting to list the top 20 threads, and see how many pages there are for each.
i suspect we might end up banning talking about the weather/word games/football.....in Britain !!!!
(looking at number of "views" might be instructive too !!)I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostBut which posters?
The second post on JLW's second thread was this - now hived off so that it can't be seen in its original context:
Originally Posted by Mr Pee
Oh give it a rest for God's sake. Why start yet another thread on this?
You could have just made this a new post on the other homophobia thread, but no, you had to launch a new one.?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostDoes the fault lie with posters who post in good faith, or with those who tell them to give it a rest every time they do?
I felt that when regular topics were being started on the subject of immigration that they should be 'given a rest' - not because the subject itself wss not worthy of debate but because every time it was started it ended up with a slanging match and it didn't take a lot of intelligence to work out that they got nowhere. Certain people feel strongly about certain topics, whether it's immigration, the EU, religion or gay rights. Others strongly disagree and experience shows that any attempt at 'discussion' is a lost cause before it begins.
There are many wrongs, injustices and outrages in the world: it's a matter of balance as to how often related topics are started and it's a matter of common sense to work out whether the same people are going to end up having the same arguments. [Having said that, on this forum the same thing could happen on threads that start out on the subject of knitting.]It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment