That damn' Eye
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostIt's the "serious listening audience" again
Are they like the "serious fraud office" ?
What about the "frivolous listening audience"?
'Casual' listeners listen to Radio 3 to relax and unwind. Their engagement with the station is primarily as background noise, and their listening habits are fairly erratic. This is linked to the fact that they don’t always feel engaged by the content'.
Sorry, from that description, these are not serious listeners. Are they?It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
'Casual' listeners listen to Radio 3 to relax and unwind. Their engagement with the station is primarily as background noise, and their listening habits are fairly erratic. This is linked to the fact that they don’t always feel engaged by the content'.
That'll teach em to (ab)use music for "relaxation"
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostThat's because you only listen to "serious" musicIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostGongers, you do have a bee in your bonnet, don't you, about anyone talking about 'listening seriously' or 'listening to serious music' as if you're determined to read something into it that you can object to ... Frankie Says Relax
mainly because i've encountered it many times as a justification for thinking that some music is superior to others
YES, it can be a 'serious' activity (I'm writing an orchestral piece at the moment which i'm spending many hours on) BUT using the phrase "serious music" strikes me as lazy and (often) ignorant of the way in which other musics are created and performed...... rant over, back to the score
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostI do
mainly because i've encountered it many times as a justification for thinking that some music is superior to others
Though even if some people do think 'classical music', or jazz, or rock, is superior to other sorts, they are entitled to hold that opinion. It's not something you can disprove - only disgree with.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostThat's what I meant: you don't have to take issue with everyone (in this case Lunchtime O'Boulez) for mentioning the 'serious listening audience'. I'd take that to mean people who don't want the tweets, txts, phone-ins (now gone!), quizzes, repeated trails &c - in fact anything that interrupts their serious listening
Though even if some people do think 'classical music', or jazz, or rock, is superior to other sorts, they are entitled to hold that opinion. It's not something you can disprove - only disgree with.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostFewer Smart things. More smart people.
Comment
-
Comment