Prom 61: Adès / Bruckner, BRSO, Rattle
Collapse
X
-
Has anyone here had recent experience of Rattle in Bruckner? I'm always pleased to see any Bruckner symphony at the Proms but my heart sank slightly when I saw who was conducting. I always go into these things hoping for the best but I can't help feeling that it will be the same old Rattle: emphasis on certain details (often quite strikingly. presented) but at the expense of any overall shape of the work as a whole.
-
-
The timings for this concert are curious. The RAH site claims Bruckner 4 is 55', which is ten minutes shorter than it usually is and will make for a very short concert indeed, given that the Ades is only 15'. I'm never sure how much credence to give them though. Rattle's not someone you think of as a fast conductor and it seems unlikely he's going to blast through it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Darkbloom View PostHas anyone here had recent experience of Rattle in Bruckner? I'm always pleased to see any Bruckner symphony at the Proms but my heart sank slightly when I saw who was conducting. I always go into these things hoping for the best but I can't help feeling that it will be the same old Rattle: emphasis on certain details (often quite strikingly. presented) but at the expense of any overall shape of the work as a whole.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Prommer View PostWell out of his (previous) comfort zone, I should have said!
Apart from the two recordings, he has been performing the 4th since the early 1970s and his recent LSO recording was welcomed by Richard Osborne in the Gramophone as an 'exceptional recording'. His review ended by recommending the recording and stating that it "must be the finest account of a Bruckner symphony in the LSO’s 110-year-long recorded history".
So perhaps not quite as far out of his comfort zone as you suggest.
For what its worth, I thought his performance of the 4th with the LSO was very good, both in person and on CD.
"I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square."
Lady Bracknell The importance of Being Earnest
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Darkbloom View PostThe timings for this concert are curious. The RAH site claims Bruckner 4 is 55', which is ten minutes shorter than it usually is and will make for a very short concert indeed, given that the Ades is only 15'. I'm never sure how much credence to give them though. Rattle's not someone you think of as a fast conductor and it seems unlikely he's going to blast through it.
I've often found estimated timings on the Proms website to be way out and have learnt not to rely on them at all."I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square."
Lady Bracknell The importance of Being Earnest
Comment
-
-
There is an authentic shorter finale that Rattle does in his LSO recording (which has, from memory, three different editions of the finale). But I don't think that gets us to 55 mins...
Unless he's planning the Mahler version of the finale (as recorded once by Rozhdestvensky) which is pretty severely cut in the finale
Comment
-
-
I guess we'll find out tonight but I think the most likely answer is that the RAH site has got the timings wrong. It's more like the 3rd, and it wouldn't entirely surprise me if they mixed them up. I hope we are not going to get one of the batty variants of this symphony. It's certainly not perfect (although some more devout Brucknerians insist he never blotted a line) but you can pull the finale off, it just needs a lot of concentration from the conductor. And the audience.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LHC View Post
Rattle has previously recorded Bruckner's 4th with both the BPO and the LSO and has also recorded the 6th (LSO), 7th (CBSO and LSO), 8th (Australian World Orchestra and LSO) and 9th (BPO). The Berliner's Digital Concert Hall includes recordings of 6, 7, 8 and 9; several of these more than once.
Apart from the two recordings, he has been performing the 4th since the early 1970s and his recent LSO recording was welcomed by Richard Osborne in the Gramophone as an 'exceptional recording'. His review ended by recommending the recording and stating that it "must be the finest account of a Bruckner symphony in the LSO’s 110-year-long recorded history".
So perhaps not quite as far out of his comfort zone as you suggest.
For what its worth, I thought his performance of the 4th with the LSO was very good, both in person and on CD.
Comment
-
-
Regarding RO's comment about Rattle's Bruckner 4 (which I haven't heard, so I don't have an opinion one way or the other) being the best recorded Bruckner by the LSO. Have they recorded all that much over the years? It sounds like quite an impressive statement until you start to ponder it. They're certainly not one of the first bands that come to mind when discussing Bruckner and I don't think the VPO need to look to their laurels.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Prommer View PostHaitink used to do a bit of Bruckner with the LSO, years ago? 4 and 7, perhaps. No idea if recorded. This was as a guest conductor, when Colin Davis was in charge (and possibly happy to pass the Bruckie baton to Uncle Bernie).
Gergiev will have bulldozed his way through a few.
Comment
-
Comment