Is tripartisanship over the SNP's bid to retain the £ bullying?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrGongGong
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 18357

    Originally posted by french frank View Post
    And also the settlement of the West Lothian question.
    BINGO :wink:

    Comment

    • teamsaint
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 25235

      Originally posted by french frank View Post
      When Czechoslovakia broke up the Czech Republic and Slovakia adopted separate versions of the koruna, initially at par. Eventually it was Slovakia that joined the euro and the Czechs continue with the koruna. If as Floss says, it's the 'gut feeling, the emotional reason, that matters', it's difficult to see why the Scots (the smaller country, like Slovakia, only moreso) want to retain the pound.
      I would have thought that it was possible to reconcile that "gut feeling ," long term vote for independence with a short term pragmatic acceptance of a currency union.
      Compromises , as yes voters might see it, are inevitable.
      I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

      I am not a number, I am a free man.

      Comment

      • french frank
        Administrator/Moderator
        • Feb 2007
        • 30537

        Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
        I would have thought that it was possible to reconcile that "gut feeling ," long term vote for independence with a short term pragmatic acceptance of a currency union.
        As in "Best of both worlds"? Though I'm sure HM is relieved to hear they don't want to depose her.
        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

        Comment

        • MrGongGong
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 18357

          Originally posted by french frank View Post
          As in "Best of both worlds"? Though I'm sure HM is relieved to hear they don't want to depose her.
          Why have a foreign queen ?
          Hardly "independence"

          What's wrong with real independence ?
          I find it really odd that the so called Scottish Nationalists are happy to have their currency controlled by the Bank of England
          and seem to want to keep the queen ?

          Comment

          • teamsaint
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 25235

            Originally posted by french frank View Post
            As in "Best of both worlds"? Though I'm sure HM is relieved to hear they don't want to depose her.
            Why wouldnt they want the best of both worlds? They aren't daft.

            As for HM......oh no, lets not go there, it would be balmoral.........
            I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

            I am not a number, I am a free man.

            Comment

            • MrGongGong
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 18357

              Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
              Why wouldnt they want the best of both worlds? They aren't daft.

              As for HM......oh no, lets not go there, it would be balmoral.........
              aaah yes the
              "get divorced but come round on a Friday for sex and to get your washing done" strategy

              Pick-n-mix the bits you like without having to clean the bathroom

              Comment

              • teamsaint
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 25235

                Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                aaah yes the
                "get divorced but come round on a Friday for sex and to get your washing done" strategy

                Pick-n-mix the bits you like without having to clean the bathroom

                So the option should be a good honest " complete independence in every conceivable way as long as it accords with some English Peoples view of what that means", or " as you were"?

                Perhaps the Yes people live in the real world where they want to get legal independence, and may have to compromise in some ares for electoral and pragmatic reasons.
                Seems a reasonable approach to me, if Independence is what you want. Its not dishonest, it might get them what they want.
                I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                I am not a number, I am a free man.

                Comment

                • MrGongGong
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 18357

                  Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                  So the option should be a good honest " complete independence in every conceivable way as long as it accords with some English Peoples view of what that means", or " as you were"?

                  Perhaps the Yes people live in the real world where they want to get legal independence, and may have to compromise in some ares for electoral and pragmatic reasons.
                  Seems a reasonable approach to me, if Independence is what you want. Its not dishonest, it might get them what they want.
                  Spare us the "English are all baddies" nonsense
                  What seems to be on offer is just more of that
                  rather than "independence" .........

                  Comment

                  • Flosshilde
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 7988

                    Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                    Why have a foreign queen ?
                    Hardly "independence"
                    Well, she's actually more of a 'foreign queen' for England. The Act of Settlement of 1701 stipulated that succession to the UK throne went to Princess Sophia, Electress of Hanover, the granddaughter of James I & VI, the King of Scotland who succeeded Elizabeth the Ist of England & therebye united the two kingdoms under one crown, and her descendants. So the present Queen of England is the closest (Protestant) descendant of the Scottish monarchy, & thus entitltled, post independence, to be Queen of Scotland.


                    Not that I want her.

                    (In Scotland she would/should be styled 'Elizabeth I')

                    Comment

                    • Eine Alpensinfonie
                      Host
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 20576

                      Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                      Well, she's actually more of a 'foreign queen' for England. The Act of Settlement of 1701 stipulated that succession to the UK throne went to Princess Sophia, Electress of Hanover, the granddaughter of James I & VI, the King of Scotland who succeeded Elizabeth the Ist of England & therebye united the two kingdoms under one crown, and her descendants. So the present Queen of England is the closest (Protestant) descendant of the Scottish monarchy, & thus entitltled, post independence, to be Queen of Scotland.


                      Not that I want her.

                      (In Scotland she would/should be styled 'Elizabeth I')
                      There hasn't been an English monarch for quite some time - only Saxons, Vikings, Normans, Welsh, Scottish, and now Germans. But we English always seem to make assumptions.

                      Comment

                      • Flosshilde
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 7988

                        I should also have pointed out that if Scotland separates from the UK politically, it will still be part of the United Kingdom if it retains the present monarch & her descendants.

                        Not that that has anything to do with the pound - the Queen doesn't even appear on Scottish banknotes.

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20576

                          Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                          I should also have pointed out that if Scotland separates from the UK politically, it will still be part of the United Kingdom if it retains the present monarch & her descendants.
                          Does that mean Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc. are part of the UK?

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30537

                            Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                            Not that that has anything to do with the pound - the Queen doesn't even appear on Scottish banknotes.
                            You have pound banknotes?

                            I don't think Scotland would be part of the UK - any more than the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are. It might be a British Crown Dependency ...
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • Serial_Apologist
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 37886

                              Originally posted by french frank View Post
                              You have pound banknotes?

                              I don't think Scotland would be part of the UK - any more than the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are. It might be a British Crown Dependency ...
                              Or, for a cheaper version, a British Half Crown Dependency!

                              Comment

                              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                                Host
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 20576

                                I think I'd be disappointed if Scotland were to leave the UK. We'd lose Rockall as well. I'ts been part of Scotland since 1972.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X