Originally posted by jean
View Post
The wisdom of Mr. Gove.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jean View Post
Anyway, to return to the topic, I remain surprised that, in the still prevailing post-austerity climate in which undue borrowing continues to be discouraged, Mr Gove still has any credible presence in government; "all mimsy were the borrowed Goves", as in...
Who nicked me coat?Last edited by ahinton; 02-06-15, 09:17.
Comment
-
-
Gove makes a balls-up again (so no surprise there, then). After being moved from Education where it became obvious, even to Cameron, that he was a liability, & the Whips' office, where he proved completely ineffectual, he was given the chance to wear fancy dress as the Lord Chancellor & Justice minister (or secretary?). Where he promptly made a balls-up of the proposed abolition of the Human Rights Act, so that it's had to be postponed, if not cancelled.Last edited by Flosshilde; 29-05-15, 19:38.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostGove makes a balls-up again (so no surprise there, then). After being moved from Education where it became obvious, even to Cameron, that he was a liability, & the Whips' office, where he proved completely ineffectual, he was given the chance to wear fancy dress as the Lord Chancellor & Justice minister (or secretary?). Where he promptly made a balls-up of the proposed abolition of the Human Rights Act, so that it's had to be postponed, if not cancelled.Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostI came back from Aberdeen today
but sadly they don't want this sh*t for brains back
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostWhere he promptly made a balls-up of the proposed abolition of the Human Rights Act, so that it's had to be postponed, if not cancelled.
Comment
-
-
They really didn't think that one through, did they?
Lets see how these clowns get on with forcing housing associations to sell their properties..... I haven't heard anyone (apart from the idiots who suggested it) say that this is
a: a good idea
b: legal
Nice to see their "Legal Highs" bill will outlaw Coffee, Whisky and Perfume
as well as eating on the train
"For the purposes of this Act a person consumes a substance if the person causes or allows the substance, or fumes given off by the substance, to enter the person's body in any way."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post"For the purposes of this Act a person consumes a substance if the person causes or allows the substance, or fumes given off by the substance, to enter the person's body in any way."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostI haven't actually followed that "issue", but maybe David Cameron is cleverer than we all thought. One way of getting things "not done" is to make sure that the persons responsible are unable, but not obviously unwilling, to carry them out.
Comment
-
Comment