Lib Dems - the party we can trust???

[Beef Oven!]

Bollocks and Drivel

Publisher, or law firm?

[teamsaint]

Anarchist!

fair comment.
Though I did mean that we don't ALWAYS need rules to make things work properly.

[Beef Oven!]

fair comment.
Though I did mean that we don't ALWAYS need rules to make things work properly.

Anarchists don't go to Brahms gigs, they try to get into his train carriage, brandishing a revolver.

[teamsaint]

Anarchists don't go to Brahms gigs, they try to get into his train carriage, brandishing a revolver.

lets not drag the Beatles into the crossfire.

Who Killed Bambi?

(Edit : I did see a bloke at the RFH who was wearing red trousers. Was he an anarchist , do you think? )

[MrGongGong]

It gets worse

It's always good to change your fantasy fiction collection every few years
looking forward to the next part of the multi-episode saga

[MrGongGong]

(Edit : I did see a bloke at the RFH who was wearing red trousers. Was he an anarchist , do you think? )

no

http://lookatmyfuckingredtrousers.blogspot.co.uk/

[teamsaint]

I cannot see anybody in red trousers now, without that website coming to mind.

its a very odd sensation. noaapropriatesmileythingknown.

[Beef Oven!]

looking forward to the next part of the multi-episode saga

Me too. The UKIP is dynamic, ever-adapting. It's part of the attraction (possibly why you're always banging on about them).

[french frank]

l(Edit : I did see a bloke at the RFH who was wearing red trousers. Was he an anarchist , do you think? )

Probably Mr Ferguson, the elected mayor of Bristol - he always wears red trousers.

[amateur51]

Me too. The UKIP is dynamic, ever-adapting. It's part of the attraction (possibly why you're always banging on about them).

Sounds like an amoeba to me, which might explain its attraction to some.

[ahinton]

Me too. The UKIP is dynamic, ever-adapting.

I cannot agree about the former but it will certainly need to be the latter. Just think of what its acronym stands for - the "United Kingdom Independence Party". That suggests a party whose intended rôle is to represent those who might support in in four countries known as the United Kingdom of which three make up Britain as it is currently constituted; it also appears to stand for the notion of "independence".

If Scotland opts for independence later this year, that United Kingdom will be reduced in size, population and number of constituent countries. Once Catalunya's referendum for independence from the remainder of Spain's been held a few weeks after the Scottish one (and perhaps especially if that, too, results in its independence), all eyes - or at least very many - will likely be on the distinct possibility of Wales aiming to follow Scotland's suit, encouraged by Scotland's successful bid for independence. Independence for Wales will in one sense be of even greater significance than that for Scotland, since it will signal the end of Great Britain. What might then happen to Northern Ireland would be anyone's guess, I suppose, but I cannot see much mileage in "the United Kingdom of England and Northern Ireland", can you?

Anyway, the point here is that, without thoroughly reinventing itself as an organisation that would almost certainly be largely unrecognisable to its current supporters, UKIP will inevitably be dependent upon the continued existence of the United Kingdom and, if that finally bites the dust, it'll find itself obliged to change a good deal more than just its name (albeit hopefully not to the "English Defence League")...

[Beef Oven!]

I cannot agree about the former but it will certainly need to be the latter. Just think of what its acronym stands for - the "United Kingdom Independence Party". That suggests a party whose intended rôle is to represent those who might support in in four countries known as the United Kingdom of which three make up Britain as it is currently constituted; it also appears to stand for the notion of "independence".

If Scotland opts for independence later this year, that United Kingdom will be reduced in size, population and number of constituent countries. Once Catalunya's referendum for independence from the remainder of Spain's been held a few weeks after the Scottish one (and perhaps especially if that, too, results in its independence), all eyes - or at least very many - will likely be on the distinct possibility of Wales aiming to follow Scotland's suit, encouraged by Scotland's successful bid for independence. Independence for Wales will in one sense be of even greater significance than that for Scotland, since it will signal the end of Great Britain. What might then happen to Northern Ireland would be anyone's guess, I suppose, but I cannot see much mileage in "the United Kingdom of England and Northern Ireland", can you?

Anyway, the point here is that, without thoroughly reinventing itself as an organisation that would almost certainly be largely unrecognisable to its current supporters, UKIP will inevitably be dependent upon the continued existence of the United Kingdom and, if that finally bites the dust, it'll find itself obliged to change a good deal more than just its name (albeit hopefully not to the "English Defence League")...

A rather eccentric take on things, but if you must keep talking about the UKIP.......................................

MrGG will be along soon, and he is the house UKIP commentator!

[teamsaint]

Here's something the" much loved by the Libdems" EU is up to,

http://www.realseeds.co.uk/seedlaw2.html

another blow for freedom.

The smokies and Rhubarb got off lightly.

[jean]

...if you must keep talking about the UKIP.......................................

Oh please let's!

Mr Farage signed the foreword to the 2010 manifesto as the "chief party spokesman," along with Lord Pearson and Mr Campbell Bannerman.

It said "While withdrawal from the European Union superstate is central to UKIP's message, the party has a full range of policies that have helped it grow to become Britain's fourth largest political party."

Mr Farage also launched the manifesto at a press conference in Westminster, saying it was time for "straight talking" in British politics.

Explaining why he had now disowned the document, he told LBC: "Malcolm Pearson, who was leader at the time, was picked up in interviews for not knowing the manifesto.

"Of course he didn't - it was 486 pages of excessive detail. Eighteen months ago I said I want the whole lot taken down, we reject the whole thing...

"I didn't read it. It was drivel. It was 486 pages of drivel...It was a nonsense. We have put that behind us and moved onto a professional footing."

[ahinton]

A rather eccentric take on things, but if you must keep talking about the UKIP

I do not and would not usurp your rôle in that but, more importantly, what's supposedly "eccentric" about it?

Never mind; back to the LibDems and their trustworthiness!