If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
But actually there is an enormous amount of wealth around, more than enough for everyone to have a comfortable life in their old age, the problem being that this wealth is being sequestered by a decreasing number of people.
One reads frequently about people receiving an additional 'two million pounds' for their pension pots. Additional?!
watched about half an hour of that Scotty.
Interesting. Puts all the blame for everything on big government and reckless individuals.
I smell an " angle". No mention of corporate greed, tax avoidance, bank greed and under regulation, increasing wealth divides between rich and poor, etc etc.
(apologies if they feature later on !I bet they don't .)
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
watched about half an hour of that Scotty.
Interesting. Puts all the blame for everything on big government and reckless individuals.
I smell an " angle". No mention of corporate greed, tax avoidance, bank greed and under regulation, increasing wealth divides between rich and poor, etc etc.
(apologies if they feature later on !I bet they don't .)
Indeed - and there are plenty of other factors either ignored or barely touched upon in what I've seen of it so far (which is admittedly only about half of what you have). My take on it so far is that, of those things that you mention above, all involve theft and/or administrative inadequacies and, if one also factors in global indebtedness and artificially inflated asset values, it looks ever increasingly likely that there may not in any case be all that much in terms of real monetary value to go around or even to steal, so the "crisis" of the kind that the film asks its viewers at the outset if they're prepared to take the plunge and address is vastly graver than it seeks to portray, to the extent that there might never be a solution at all.
Indeed - and there are plenty of other factors either ignored or barely touched upon in what I've seen of it so far (which is admittedly only about half of what you have). My take on it so far is that, of those things that you mention above, all involve theft and/or administrative inadequacies and, if one also factors in global indebtedness and artificially inflated asset values, it looks ever increasingly likely that there may not in any case be all that much in terms of real monetary value to go around or even to steal, so the "crisis" of the kind that the film asks its viewers at the outset if they're prepared to take the plunge and address is vastly graver than it seeks to portray, to the extent that there might never be a solution at all.
if there are to be solutions, and i think there are very deep rooted problems, then they cannot be solved by ignoring those other factors.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
if there are to be solutions, and i think there are very deep rooted problems, then they cannot be solved by ignoring those other factors.
Indeed not - but that doesn't necessarily of itself meant that there are viable and sustainable solutions even if all factors are duly taken into consideration...
But actually there is an enormous amount of wealth around, more than enough for everyone to have a comfortable life in their old age, the problem being that this wealth is being sequestered by a decreasing number of people.
Have you actually stopped to think and do the maths on this? Mmmm? Yes, there are a number of uber-rich people in the world. Take their total net worth. Now divide it by the number of people on this planet. You can have my 6.5p willingly.
watched about half an hour of that Scotty.
Interesting. Puts all the blame for everything on big government and reckless individuals.
I smell an " angle". No mention of (some) corporate greed, (some) tax avoidance, (some) bank greed and (some) under regulation, (some) increasing wealth divides between rich and poor, etc etc.
(apologies if they feature later on !I bet they don't .)
Have you actually stopped to think and do the maths on this? Mmmm? Yes, there are a number of uber-rich people in the world. Take their total net worth. Now divide it by the number of people on this planet. You can have my 6.5p willingly.
Over the past 30 years, income inequality in the UK has grown at an alarming rate. This infographic shows the extent of this inequality, and how most people would be better off today if we lived in a more equal society. Please use the options at the bottom of this page to share this with […]
He used to go on about how self-employed folk who didn't have "business" bank accounts were somehow criminals but never really explained why ?
SO I think he might be a little pointless ?
Well, I am not as narrow-minded as you, clearly. I like to look at the population of the world. Are you suggesting that a tribesman in Mali is not worthy of wealth redistribution?
Comment