Musical Homophobia - or The Homophobia Histories

[jean]

Judging by the rest of this thread, it's only a matter of time.

Can you quote me the evidence from any post of mine that leads you to think so?

(You mentioned me by name, remember.)

[Beef Oven!]

Thanks for answering the question scotty asked me in your inimitably succint way, ahinton!

Except he's wrong. In destroying the fundamental principles of conjugality and procreation, replacing them with a neutered gender-free notion of partnership, the human rights of many have been destroyed by UK law.

Not easy is it?

[An_Inspector_Calls]

Can you quote me the evidence from any post of mine that leads you to think so?

(You mentioned me by name, remember.)

Try the sequence:

To recap, then:

. . .

4. If we venture to raise this subject as an area of intense concern to gays (not to mention to others) we should also be advocating taking military action against Syria.

(Which was a ridiculous caricature of RM's ironical post anyway)

You then have

Ff's four points seem to sum up pretty accurately what scotty, RM and Mr Pee have had to say on and about this thread.

And of course Scotty had never made the link to the Syrian question. Not surprisingly, Scotty was confused . . .

[Barbirollians]

Except he's wrong. In destroying the fundamental principles of conjugality and procreation, replacing them with a neutered gender-free notion of partnership, the human rights of many have been destroyed by UK law.

Not easy is it?

What utter nonsense - what human rights have been destroyed . The right to marry has just been extended .

[Serial_Apologist]

Except he's wrong. In destroying the fundamental principles of conjugality and procreation, replacing them with a neutered gender-free notion of partnership, the human rights of many have been destroyed by UK law.

Not easy is it?

I don't see that. I've managed thus far to avoid fundamental principles of conjugality and procreation (afaik successfully) without being gay.

[Beef Oven!]

I don't see that. I've managed thus far to avoid fundamental principles of conjugality and procreation (afaik successfully) without being gay.

Said it wasn't easy, didn't I?

[jean]

But I think S-A has just said it was.

[ferneyhoughgeliebte]

Try the sequence:
If we venture to raise this subject as an area of intense concern to gays (not to mention to others) we should also be advocating taking military action against Syria

(Which was a ridiculous caricature of RM's ironical post anyway)

You then have
Ff's four points seem to sum up pretty accurately what scotty, RM and Mr Pee have had to say on and about this thread.

And of course Scotty had never made the link to the Syrian question. Not surprisingly, Scotty was confused . . .

? And this "sequence" leads you to believe that I am about to call MrCelt a "Nazi", Mr Birling?

[jean]

And me, don't forget.

I thought that ff's four points summarised pretty accurately the various contributions made by scotty, RM and M. Pee to this thread. But not all three said everything that was included, and I made it clear (I hope) to scotty that ff's no. 4 didn't refer to anything he'd said.

More pertinently, there's no mention of Nazis anywhere in the 'sequence'.

'

[An_Inspector_Calls]

You made your correction later, but only after Scotty had answered your strawman point.

And here you (and ferny) go again with a false argument! You asked for a sequence demonstrating your previous misleading, strawman assertions. You have that, unrefuted. Now you attempt to counter this by observing that this example does not support my ironic prediction that someone will change SA's Nazi reference. More puff pastry I fear.

[ferneyhoughgeliebte]

You made your correction later, but only after Scotty had answered your strawman point.

And here you (and ferny) go again with a false argument! You asked for a sequence demonstrating your previous misleading, strawman assertions. You have that, unrefuted. Now you attempt to counter this by observing that this example does not support my ironic prediction that someone will change SA's Nazi reference. More puff pastry I fear.

Who're you calling a puff?

[ahinton]

Hinton: what straight questions? Or do you mean answering the constructed arguments/positions of others?

Ahinton to you. Read the relevant portions of the thread; there's ample evidence and most of it's not directly connected with questions from me, either.

[ahinton]

Thanks for answering the question scotty asked me in your inimitably succint way, ahinton!

My pleasure; that's not to discourage you form providing your own, naturally!

[jean]

You made your correction later, but only after Scotty had answered your strawman point.

It was ff's post that scotty responded to on that point, not mine.

I clarified something; I didn't correct anything - I didn't need to.

[ahinton]

In destroying the fundamental principles of conjugality and procreation

What? Who's done that, then? Nothing in the new UK law makes any difference to the conduct, entitlement and human rights of heterosexuals.

Not easy is it?

Not for anyone determined to try to make it appear difficult at all costs, I suppose, no...