Wearing of Burka

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jean
    Late member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7100

    #91
    Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
    I'd be worried about this if I was giving evidence - either as a witness or the accused...
    And I've been worried about it as a juror!

    Comment

    • ahinton
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 16122

      #92
      Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
      So feminism is a "cult" now is it? Interesting.
      To scotty, perhaps; I have no devidence to suggest that this is other than a very isolated "view"...

      Comment

      • Pabmusic
        Full Member
        • May 2011
        • 5537

        #93
        Originally posted by jean View Post
        And I've been worried about it as a juror!
        To be fair, no-one expects jurors to consider a witness's demeanour in isolation. It's a summation - you've heard the evidence and seen the witnesses, now what do you believe? Do you accept what A said? If so, where does that leave us? Do you think B was being completely truthful when he said...? And you make those judgements on what you have seen and heard, using your common sense.

        Comment

        • scottycelt

          #94
          Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
          So feminism is a "cult" now is it? Interesting.
          Had to smile at the address of this site ... nothing to do with me ... honestly. :laugh:



          Still, we are getting ever so slightly off-topic here aren't we ...?

          Comment

          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
            Gone fishin'
            • Sep 2011
            • 30163

            #95
            Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
            And you make those judgements on what you have seen and heard, using your common sense.
            We're doomed!
            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

            Comment

            • jean
              Late member
              • Nov 2010
              • 7100

              #96
              Good grief, scotty, where do you find these things?

              This one's on a par with those anti-gay-marriage gay people you quoted on another thread

              (Sorry to bring up the forbidden subject again)

              But you're overreacting. I for one have never assumed your Catholic faith is arrived at and sustained without the involvement of reason.

              That's why I think it's worth encouraging you to take the application of reason a little further, rather than giving you up as a lost cause.

              Comment

              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                Gone fishin'
                • Sep 2011
                • 30163

                #97
                Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View Post
                We must remember that the Courts of Justice are a secular institution and so religious dress etc, should not be an issue. Therefore, the Judge is quite right about the woman covering her face.
                Is anyone doubting this, Bbm? As pointed out in #30, spokespersons/"leaders" from the Muslim communities agree that this is the case, and that there is no problem for anyone in asking a woman to reveal her face in a Court of Law.
                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                Comment

                • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                  Gone fishin'
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 30163

                  #98
                  Originally posted by jean View Post
                  That's why I think it's worth encouraging you to take the application of reason a little further, rather than giving you up as a lost cause.
                  Doooomed, I tell ye!
                  [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                  Comment

                  • jean
                    Late member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 7100

                    #99
                    Well, I haven't given up yet.

                    Because I know scotty is an intelligent and open-minded person really, I know he will read this:

                    Comment

                    • amateur51

                      Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                      Doooomed, I tell ye!
                      :laugh:

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30210

                        Originally posted by jean View Post
                        And I've been worried about it as a juror!
                        But you will usually be one of twelve who get to discuss such points, which will again be 'not evidence' although you'll presumably take it into consideration if you have doubts.

                        As pabs's link shows, people are well aware of the fact that some people, more than others, are simply nervous about appearing as witnesses and display an anxiety that they will be disbelieved. A judge will give some directions to the jurors as to what they should consider. And among twelve jurors I imagine there will be some who are just suspicious of a witness who insists on hiding her facial expressions and 'demeanour'.

                        Juries make mistakes - the nature of the beast. I don't know what the statistics are of those who convict when they should acquit as against those who acquit when they should convict. Impossible to establish, I suppose.
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • Pabmusic
                          Full Member
                          • May 2011
                          • 5537

                          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                          We're doomed!
                          Always been that way, Ferney. The alternative is to have judges make the decisions.

                          Comment

                          • amateur51

                            Originally posted by french frank View Post
                            Juries make mistakes - the nature of the beast. I don't know what the statistics are of those who convict when they should acquit as against those who acquit when they should convict. Impossible to establish, I suppose.
                            And best left that way

                            Comment

                            • Flosshilde
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 7988

                              Originally posted by jean View Post
                              Good grief, scotty, where do you find these things?
                              Perhaps he writes them?

                              The home page is interesting http://www.celticsurf.net/home/ (in a rather weird way).

                              Comment

                              • french frank
                                Administrator/Moderator
                                • Feb 2007
                                • 30210

                                Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                                The home page is interesting http://www.celticsurf.net/home/ (in a rather weird way).
                                You mean the "Beam me up" link?
                                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X