Originally posted by Flosshilde
View Post
Wearing of Burka
Collapse
X
-
scottycelt
-
Originally posted by scottycelt View PostYes, that's why I said it had absolutely nothing to do with me...
It is you who have taken this tiny backwater of antifeminist nonsense and, by dint if posting a link to it on one of the most widely read and respected organs in the entire country, or even the world, have endorsed it to a mainstream audience of millions.
Comment
-
-
scottycelt
Originally posted by jean View PostWell, I haven't given up yet.
Because I know scotty is an intelligent and open-minded person really, I know he will read this:
http://catholicfeminist.com/2013/04/...olic-feminist/
They're everywhere, jean ... everywhere ... Fems lurking under the pulpits and pews and waiting to pounce on unsuspecting male worshippers.
And one a bit nearer home has just told me to get back to paint-stripping the bathroom walls ... what a life. (Enter Ams51 with a Hancock clip!)
Comment
-
Originally posted by jean View PostYou can't evade the responsibility so easily, scotty - if it didn't before, it does now.
It is you who have taken this tiny backwater of antifeminist nonsense and, by dint if posting a link to it on one of the most widely read and respected organs in the entire country, or even the world, have endorsed it to a mainstream audience of millions.
Comment
-
-
Getting back to women's 'free choice': I knew two women - a generation older than me, both married (one a Catholic, but apart from the fact that she had nine children, I won't make that a factor), neither drove a car because their husbands drove everywhere, and in one case he wouldn't let his wife learn, the husband looked after all the finances, got in the tradesmen to do repairs &c &c. Nice life for the wives, free from all the worries shouldered by the husband. I don't know how they voted, but in my time I not infrequently came across women who had no idea which party they would vote for because 'my husband decides that'. They were happy bunnies.
But they were culturally indoctrinated to take the 'woman's role', be obedient and subservient: so this was not free choice - it was unthinking acceptance of a status quo, the knowledge of what was expected of women in their position. No wonder some feel that feminists have a lot to answer for, dratted females.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostFalse consciousness, it's called.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostBut they were culturally indoctrinated to take the 'woman's role', be obedient and subservient: so this was not free choice - it was unthinking acceptance of a status quo, the knowledge of what was expected of women in their position. No wonder some feel that feminists have a lot to answer for, dratted females.
Comment
-
-
Given a certain battering elsewhere, I'm flattered (and not at all unpleased) to see that my personal analysis coincided with Marxist thought.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
scottycelt
Originally posted by french frank View PostGetting back to women's 'free choice': I knew two women - a generation older than me, both married (one a Catholic, but apart from the fact that she had nine children, I won't make that a factor), neither drove a car because their husbands drove everywhere, and in one case he wouldn't let his wife learn, the husband looked after all the finances, got in the tradesmen to do repairs &c &c. Nice life for the wives, free from all the worries shouldered by the husband. I don't know how they voted, but in my time I not infrequently came across women who had no idea which party they would vote for because 'my husband decides that'. They were happy bunnies.
The striking thing about the above is that the two women you mention you also describe as 'happy bunnies'. So you would really have preferred them to be unhappy? Surely 'happiness' is the only real goal of each and every one of us?
Originally posted by french frank View PostBut they were culturally indoctrinated to take the 'woman's role', be obedient and subservient: so this was not free choice - it was unthinking acceptance of a status quo, the knowledge of what was expected of women in their position. No wonder some feel that feminists have a lot to answer for, dratted females.
Not my experience, again quite the reverse. A male contributor says he's 'a proud feminist'. Some women who presumably know rather better about the actual state of being a woman beg to differ and are equally as 'proud'. (sorry to astonish Jean with yet another link readily available alongside scores of similar others on Google!)
Webs.com has been shut down on the 31st of August 2023. Find out what that means for your site and how to move it to another provider.
Women would appear to be just as diverse as men. Not all women are feminists just like not all men are misogynists!
Comment
-
Originally posted by scottycelt View PostSurely 'happiness' is the only real goal of each and every one of us?
You seem to think that feminism=female.
Not all women are feministsIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by scottycelt View PostOne marrying a Catholic, eh? ... poor thing, how utterly dreadful. :winkeye:
The striking thing about the above is that the two women you mention you also describe as 'happy bunnies'. So you would really have preferred them to be unhappy? Surely 'happiness' is the only real goal of each and every one of us?
Comment
-
Comment