Damascus gas attack - who did it and how will the west spin it ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr Pee
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 3285

    Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
    Oh look ..........

    FURIOUS politicians have demanded Prime Minister David Cameron explain why chemical export licences were granted to firms last January – 10 months after the Syrian uprising began.


    what a surprise
    That's a rather sensationalist headline; British firms sold chemicals that could have then been used as part of a chemical weapon. There is no proof that they were used in such a way. And the export licences were revoked as soon as the EU sanctions were applied.

    This is a non-story.
    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.

    Mark Twain.

    Comment

    • John Wright
      Full Member
      • Mar 2007
      • 705

      Originally posted by Mr Pee View Post
      Lord Ashdown was interviewed on Sky News this morning and I think he summed up what many of us think after last night's vote:- (Scroll down the videos on the right hand side of the page- it's the second video down).



      I agree with him that it is shaming that we should stand idly by whilst Assad slaughters his own people. We might as well just dispense with our armed forces and have done with it.
      But Pee, did you say that after he killed the first 10,000? Or after the first 20,000? Or the first 50,000? When did you think to intervene?

      It's too late to do anything now. The civilians must trek to Jordan or Lebanon, let the armed men fight it out to the end.....


      Pee, I didn't get a reply from you yesterday!
      - - -

      John W

      Comment

      • zoomy
        Full Member
        • Jan 2011
        • 118

        [QUOTE=french frank;326454] Blairite has left Miliband's Labour party.

        Wonderful !

        I am so glad the Labour party forced Milliband not to support the government. Perhaps the Labour leadership will now finally escape from the political cowardice that it has so far suffered under Milliband and Brown before him.

        Comment

        • zoomy
          Full Member
          • Jan 2011
          • 118

          Is Obama seeking a way out by asking congress to vote on military action ? hoping they might prevent an attack since the US coalition is now unravelling so fast and he needs more allies than just France to launch an attack.


          So is Obama seeking a way out of this unwise course that he was persuaded upon by Hollaninde and (ironically now) Cameron ? or is he genuinely seeking backing from congress.

          Comment

          • MrGongGong
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 18357

            Originally posted by Mr Pee View Post
            That's a rather sensationalist headline; British firms sold chemicals that could have then been used as part of a chemical weapon. There is no proof that they were used in such a way. And the export licences were revoked as soon as the EU sanctions were applied.

            This is a non-story.
            You need "proof" ?
            now that's a change
            why not bomb them back to the stone age first ?

            Comment

            • Mr Pee
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 3285

              Originally posted by John Wright View Post
              But Pee, did you say that after he killed the first 10,000? Or after the first 20,000? Or the first 50,000? When did you think to intervene?

              It's too late to do anything now. The civilians must trek to Jordan or Lebanon, let the armed men fight it out to the end.....


              Pee, I didn't get a reply from you yesterday!
              And at what point would you have decided enough was enough? Apparently even the use of chemical weapons, outlawed by the Geneva Convention, is not enough to convince you that action is required. You seem to want to have it both ways- on the one hand you seem to be saying that we shouldn't get involved, and on the other you imply that we have waited too long.

              One thing we can all agree on, surely, is that military intervention should be a last resort. But when Assad starts using chemical weapons- WMDs- against his own people, and bombs a school with napalm, then, as Obama said, he has crossed the line, and that last resort becomes a justifiable response.

              By the way, I saw some burglars break into my elderly neighbour's house last night and they beat her up. But you know what- I took my lead from the House of Commons, and decided it was nothing to do with me.....
              Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.

              Mark Twain.

              Comment

              • MrGongGong
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 18357

                Originally posted by Mr Pee View Post
                By the way, I saw some burglars break into my elderly neighbour's house last night and they beat her up. But you know what- I took my lead from the House of Commons, and decided it was nothing to do with me.....
                I saw that too
                so I set fire to a house on the next street
                can't let them get away with it
                that'll teach em ...........

                Comment

                • John Wright
                  Full Member
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 705

                  Originally posted by Mr Pee View Post
                  One thing we can all agree on, surely, is that military intervention should be a last resort......
                  So Pee, you thought it not worth intervening when Assad had killed the first 10,000 civilians? Or after the first 20,000? Or the first 50,000?
                  - - -

                  John W

                  Comment

                  • zoomy
                    Full Member
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 118

                    Ashdown - “In 50 years trying to serve my country I have never felt so depressed/ashamed. Britain's answer to the Syrian horrors? none of our business!”

                    Ho, ho Mr Ashdown is ashamed that we have decided not to bomb Damascus killing how many thousands more in this civil war.

                    Comment

                    • Mr Pee
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 3285

                      Originally posted by zoomy View Post
                      Ashdown - “In 50 years trying to serve my country I have never felt so depressed/ashamed. Britain's answer to the Syrian horrors? none of our business!”

                      Ho, ho Mr Ashdown is ashamed that we have decided not to bomb Damascus killing how many thousands more in this civil war.
                      You seem have access to secret details of any proposed military action. Do tell us more.
                      Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.

                      Mark Twain.

                      Comment

                      • Mr Pee
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 3285

                        Originally posted by John Wright View Post
                        So Pee, you thought it not worth intervening when Assad had killed the first 10,000 civilians? Or after the first 20,000? Or the first 50,000?
                        What's the point in replying if you don't bother reading the reply?
                        Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.

                        Mark Twain.

                        Comment

                        • John Wright
                          Full Member
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 705

                          Originally posted by John Wright View Post
                          So Pee, you thought it not worth intervening when Assad had killed the first 10,000 civilians? Or after the first 20,000? Or the first 50,000?
                          The discussion can continue when you answer the question!
                          - - -

                          John W

                          Comment

                          • Mr Pee
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 3285

                            Originally posted by John Wright View Post
                            The discussion can continue when you answer the question!
                            I did answer the question, but since you seem incapable of understanding my answer, I will simplify it for you.

                            The line was crossed when the Assad regime killed almost 1,500 civilians by the use of chemical weapons, which are outlawed under the terms of the Geneva Convention.

                            Got it?
                            Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.

                            Mark Twain.

                            Comment

                            • JimD
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 267

                              Directing insults at Paddy Ashdown seems to me a fairly pointless activity. He is a cheap and easy target, and maybe even a deserving one. But perhaps those who apparently think that kind of thing is a useful contribution might like to try their hand at invective in a slightly trickier case (and I don't mean "Abbott".)

                              A doctor criticises Ed Miliband for his role in Parliament rejecting the principle of Britain taking part in a military strike against Syria.

                              Comment

                              • french frank
                                Administrator/Moderator
                                • Feb 2007
                                • 30206

                                Originally posted by JimD View Post
                                Directing insults at Paddy Ashdown seems to me a fairly pointless activity. He is a cheap and easy target, and maybe even a deserving one. But perhaps those who apparently think that kind of thing is a useful contribution might like to try their hand at invective in a slightly trickier case (and I don't mean "Abbott".)

                                http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23909554
                                Well done for attempting to return discussion to the important issues, JimD. I saw that story yesterday, which got me investigating Hand in Hand for Syria, and thence to the MRDF and Islam21c - which was saying the opposite of Dr Rola (though I'm not sure whether there has been a revised views since the discovery of the use of chemical weapons). But you are right: it isn't just the hawkish ex-military who want western military intervention; but nor are they united.
                                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X