Privacy and the State

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard Barrett

    Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
    It easily could be argued that it was the Allies humiliating the Germans after WWI who were initially responsible for the rise of Hitler, the Holocaust etc.
    Yes it could. That humiliation was certainly a contributory factor, don't you think? - and not in any way necessary.

    Comment

    • french frank
      Administrator/Moderator
      • Feb 2007
      • 30329

      Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
      Yes it could. That humiliation was certainly a contributory factor, don't you think? - and not in any way necessary.
      That's what the study of history is for, surely, rather than learning the dates 1939-45?
      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

      Comment

      • scottycelt

        Originally posted by french frank View Post
        I merely posed a question. You presuppose the answer.
        I simply calculated that was the only logical reason for your question and gave my answer!

        Originally posted by french frank View Post
        Oh, but it may be a reason. That is not the same as an excuse, or justification.
        Precisely, so therefore I fail to see your point! If a 'reason' is not an 'excuse' or 'justification' it is irrelevant.

        I may think I have good 'reason' to murder my wife but to hasten my nearest and dearest's demise would be an act of unspeakable cruelty and barbarity deserving of no 'understanding' whatsoever!

        Comment

        • Richard Barrett

          Originally posted by french frank View Post
          That's what the study of history is for, surely, rather than learning the dates 1939-45?
          I would have thought so, yes, just as in amateur51's observation that, historically, governments have to (heaven forfend) end up negotiating with terrorists in order for there to be peace, as in Northern Ireland. Isn't that a better strategy (assuming there's a will to find one, which I've argued there isn't) than gradually constructing a 1984-like surveillance state?

          Comment

          • Richard Barrett

            Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
            I may think I have good 'reason' to murder my wife
            But you couldn't ever actually have a reason to murder someone, right? - what a strange example to think of...

            Comment

            • french frank
              Administrator/Moderator
              • Feb 2007
              • 30329

              Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
              If a 'reason' is not an 'excuse' or 'justification' it is irrelevant.

              I may think I have good 'reason' to murder my wife but to hasten my nearest and dearest's demise would be an act of unspeakable cruelty and barbarity deserving of no 'understanding' whatsoever!
              Irrelevant to what? You're again using the word 'understanding' (noun) in a sense which implies sympathy. To understand the whys and wherefores of people's behaviour does not necessarily mean you sympathise, approve or condone.
              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

              Comment

              • scottycelt

                Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
                But you couldn't ever actually have a reason to murder someone, right? - what a strange example to think of...
                Well ... er, sorry ... it's you (and others) who are claiming the 'reason' behind murder is all-important and must be 'understood'.

                Not me ... and I have to agree it's a very 'strange' argument!

                Comment

                • scottycelt

                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  Irrelevant to what? You're again using the word 'understanding' (noun) in a sense which implies sympathy. To understand the whys and wherefores of people's behaviour does not necessarily mean you sympathise, approve or condone.
                  So the mass-murderers tell you that they don't give a toss what you or anybody else thinks about their behaviour.

                  What's the next step in your quest for 'understanding' ... ?

                  Comment

                  • vinteuil
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 12846

                    Originally posted by scottycelt View Post

                    What's the next step in your quest for 'understanding' ... ?
                    ... to use my brain. To think. To ponder. To weigh up alternative explanations.


                    Is any of this beyond you?

                    Comment

                    • french frank
                      Administrator/Moderator
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 30329

                      Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                      Well ... er, sorry ... it's you (and others) who are claiming the 'reason' behind murder is all-important and must be 'understood'.

                      Not me ... and I have to agree it's a very 'strange' argument!
                      A man shot dead by police in a street in Brighton was lawfully killed, an inquest jury concludes.



                      He might have got more than 5 years if he hadn't been suffering from dementia

                      A 74-year-old man suffering from dementia who brutally beat his wife to death with a walking stick in a row over the heating is jailed.
                      Last edited by french frank; 29-10-13, 20:08.
                      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                      Comment

                      • scottycelt

                        Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                        ... to use my brain. To think. To ponder. To weigh up alternative explanations.


                        Is any of this beyond you?
                        I don't think so ...

                        But before one can use a brain, think, ponder and weigh up alternative explanations the first essential before suddenly entering a debate is to be blessed with a brain.

                        Comment

                        • vinteuil
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 12846

                          Originally posted by scottycelt View Post

                          But before one can use a brain, think, ponder and weigh up alternative explanations the first essential before suddenly entering a debate is to be blessed with a brain.
                          ... which you are. Hence my surprise that you don't seem to wish to use it, to try to "understand" things. Why the wish not to understand?

                          Comment

                          • scottycelt

                            Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                            ... which you are. Hence my surprise that you don't seem to wish to use it, to try to "understand" things. Why the wish not to understand?
                            Thank you ... I thought my 'street-cred' on this forum had suddenly plummeted for a horrible moment. :ironic laugh:

                            What is there to further 'understand'. I 'understand' only too well when murderous thugs kill and maim innocent men. women, children and babies in prams to 'promote their cause' and threaten to do the same again if their demands are not met.

                            It is maybe others who need to 'understand' that just as well as those who do ...

                            Comment

                            • vinteuil
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 12846

                              Originally posted by scottycelt View Post

                              What is there to further 'understand'. I 'understand' only too well when murderous thugs kill and maim innocent men. women, children and babies in prams to 'promote their cause' and threaten to do the same again if their demands are not met.

                              ...
                              ... if you understand this, can you explain to us why they do these things?

                              Comment

                              • french frank
                                Administrator/Moderator
                                • Feb 2007
                                • 30329

                                Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                                can you explain to us why they do these things?
                                I was just going to enquire whether scotty knew exactly what the word 'why' means.
                                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X